Search This Blog

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and the Obama White House Discriminates Against Christians and Women
It appears that most major non-Christian lobbies, but especially Jews and Muslims, are pushing very hard against Christians' Civil Rights.

I think the proper terminology is "anti-Christ" or "anti-Christian", which is a lot like "anti-Semitic" except that many Christians are also Semites (like myself)... Conversely, it is a fact that many Jews are also Christians... I may or may not have substantially more authentic, bona-fide Jewish ancestry than many typically online, politically activist, loudly vocal and often verbally abusive, self-proclaimed "Jews" who maliciously seek to profit from their bogus "legal" status.  However, unlike so many of them, especially the aggressively hateful ones, I prefer truth over fictions.
... I made the following post on the White House Facebook page, in response to a lie from another poster, who had ridiculed the notion that a Catholic Pope could possibly be Jewish.  In fact, he implied that any Christians who believe such an idea must be "crazy", "lying", or "stupid"... My response to that, quote (cut and pasted), is as follows:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   "Jews include three groups:   people who were born to a Jewish family regardless of whether or not they follow the religion, those who have some Jewish ancestral background or lineage (sometimes including those who do not have strictly matrilineal descent), and people without any Jewish ancestral background or lineage who have formally converted to Judaism and therefore are followers of the religion."...

"Interpretations of sections of the Tanakh, such as Deuteronomy 7:1–5, by learned Jewish sages, are used as a warning against intermarriage between Jews and Canaanites because '[the non-Jewish husband] will cause your child to turn away from Me and they will worship the gods (i.e., idols) of others.'  Leviticus 24:10 says that the son in a marriage between a Hebrew woman and an Egyptian man is 'of the community of Israel.'  This is complemented by Ezra 10:2–3, where Israelites returning from Babylon vow to put aside their 'gentile' [a word which was only coined by Jews during the 15th century AD] wives and their children.   Since the Haskalah, these halakhic interpretations of Jewish identity have been challenged."...
"According to historian Shaye J. D. Cohen, in the Bible, the status of the offspring of mixed marriages was determined patrilineally.   He brings two likely explanations for the change in Mishnaic times:   first, the Mishnah may have been applying the same logic to mixed marriages as it had applied to other mixtures (kilayim).   Thus, a mixed marriage is forbidden as is the union of a horse and a donkey, and in both unions the offspring are judged ~matrilineally.

"Second, the Tannaim may have been influenced by Roman law, which dictated that when a parent could not contract a legal marriage, offspring would follow the mother.

"At times, ~conversion has accounted for a substantial part of Jewish population growth.   In the first century of the Christian era, for example, the [Jewish] population more than ~doubled, from four to 8–10 million within the confines of the Roman Empire, in good part as a result of a wave of ~conversion."...
According to the Chabad, you might think you're a Jew and yet not be, really; and conversely, you might be ~unaware that you are Jewish and yet be so.

Judaism shares some of the characteristics of a nation, an ethnicity, a religion..., and a culture, making the definition of who is a Jew vary slightly depending on whether a religious or national approach to identity is used.[40][41] Generally, in modern secular usage, Jews include three groups: peopl...See More
[Posted on May 28, 2012 here:
Note that the post I responded to, written by a Government or Corporate Troll calling himself "Stanley Hammer" (could he possibly be more obviously racist than that reference to the Scandinavian god, Thor -- which just happens to be a favorite among online Jews, inexplicably?) has since been removed... But my response which was supposedly 'disorderly' was not removed.  It makes no sense for Facebook to state that I was suspended from their site because of a comment which was reportedly removed yet wasn't really.  The way they operate is incomprehensible, and I hope that it soon backfires on them; may Justice be served.
I can't help but notice too, that most online forum moderators are also supposedly 'Jewish' (politically and culturally, if not genetically) / Thor-worshipping Pagans.  Some of them pretend to not be Jewish, but are proudly German and have lots of Ashkenazi Jewish 'friends' and family.  Likewise, they have lots of NAZI friends and family.  I realize that seems unlikely, but it is the current reality in which we exist.  It's is worth pointing out too, how often Jews accuse other Jews of being NAZIs.  I no longer think that it is because they're just hysterical and over-reactive; no, it seems they actually know what they're talking about.  They're telling the truth:  many Jews truly are also NAZIS these days.
Although these unfortunately too frequent run-ins with vicious, trollish, online Jews is terribly unpleasant for me, I'm nevertheless grateful for the opportunity to be enlightened to the truth about them.  Far be it from me, to go through life with blinders on, or wearing rose-colored glasses.  The truth is often ugly, repulsive, disgusting, even hideous... but even so, it is far superior to pretty, sugar-coated lies.
As you can see, nearly the entire comment was quoted from online sources which are essentially of a Jewish character.  And what little I added was simply contributory to the understanding of the topic.  It is a fairly important topic to me, partly because I have often wondered if and how much Jewish blood I possess personally.  It is also important due to the number of people claiming Jewish descent who use that as political, social, and / or economic leverage.

Furthermore, what is the point in hiding the facts?  Why should anyone fear the truth?  These are the same hypocrites (Jews = Governments = Corporations) who falsely, grandiosely claim to be better educated than anyone else, yet who meanwhile operate so many of their activities under cloaks of dark secrecy.  It is quite obvious to me, that they (the 'powers that be', the rich-and-powerful) do not truly want the public to be educated to reality; because their actions speak far louder than their empty words.

Facebook Community Standards

Facebook gives people around the world the power to publish their own stories, see the world through the eyes of many other people, and connect and share wherever they go. The conversation that happens on Facebook – and the opinions expressed here – mirror the diversity of the people using Facebook.

To balance the needs and interests of a global population, Facebook protects expression that meets the community standards outlined on this page.

Please review these standards. They will help you understand what type of expression is acceptable, and what type of content may be reported and removed.
  • Violence and Threats

    Safety is Facebook's top priority. We remove content and may escalate to law enforcement when we perceive a genuine risk of physical harm, or a direct threat to public safety. You may not credibly threaten others, or organize acts of real-world violence. Organizations with a record of terrorist or violent criminal activity are not allowed to maintain a presence on our site. We also prohibit promoting, planning or celebrating any of your actions if they have, or could, result in financial harm to others, including theft and vandalism.
  • Self-Harm

    Facebook takes threats of self-harm very seriously. We remove any promotion or encouragement of self-mutilation, eating disorders or hard drug abuse. We also work with suicide prevention agencies around the world to provide assistance for people in distress.
  • Bullying and Harassment

    Facebook does not tolerate bullying or harassment. We allow users to speak freely on matters and people of public interest, but take action on all reports of abusive behavior directed at private individuals. Repeatedly targeting other users with unwanted friend requests or messages is a form of harassment.
  • Hate Speech

    Facebook does not permit hate speech, but distinguishes between serious and humorous speech. While we encourage you to challenge ideas, institutions, events, and practices, we do not permit individuals or groups to attack others based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability or medical condition.
  • Graphic Content

    People use Facebook to share events through photos and videos. We understand that graphic imagery is a regular component of current events, but must balance the needs of a diverse community. Sharing any graphic content for sadistic pleasure is prohibited.
  • Nudity and Pornography

    Facebook has a strict policy against the sharing of pornographic content and any explicitly sexual content where a minor is involved. We also impose limitations on the display of nudity. We aspire to respect people’s right to share content of personal importance, whether those are photos of a sculpture like Michelangelo's David or family photos of a child breastfeeding.
  • Identity and Privacy

    On Facebook people connect using their real names and identities. We ask that you refrain from publishing the personal information of others without their consent. Claiming to be another person, creating a false presence for an organization, or creating multiple accounts undermines community and violates Facebook¹s terms.
  • Intellectual Property

    Before sharing content on Facebook, please be sure you have the right to do so. We ask that you respect copyrights, trademarks, and other legal rights.
  • Phishing and Spam

    We take the safety of our members seriously and work to prevent attempts to compromise their privacy or security. We also ask that you respect our members by not contacting them for commercial purposes without their consent.
  • Security

    We take the safety of our members seriously and work to prevent attempts to compromise their privacy or security, including those that use fraud or deception. Additionally, we ask that you respect our members by not contacting them for commercial purposes without their consent.

Reporting Abuse

If you see something on Facebook that you believe violates our terms, you should report it to us. Please keep in mind that reporting a piece of content does not guarantee that it will be removed from the site.

Because of the diversity of our community, it's possible that something could be disagreeable or disturbing to you without meeting the criteria for being removed or blocked. For this reason, we also offer personal controls over what you see, such as the ability to hide or quietly cut ties with people, Pages, or applications that offend you.
NOTE:  On the White House page of Facebook, the right to "report abuse" is only given to a select few.  For example, I am unable to report any of the gross and voluminous abuses which are commonly directed at me on that page.  I mean personal attacks based solely on their hatred of my politics, such as calling me names like "ugly", "lesbian", etc.  So, while I am at the mercy of vicious sadists, I have no recourse.  This, my Human friends, is how our Government and their Corporate cronies operate against Individuals.  That is how they violate our Rights; and that is why Corporatism is illegal and must be abolished.  The criminal, Corporate Government must also be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law.
In no way did I violate any of Facebook's "Community Standards" for "abuse" with that post which I have copied and pasted above here.  All I did was counter misinformation with FACTS that I quoted from, Wikipedia, and Chabad.  These are the links from which I quoted, which gave some bastard(s) the opportunity to abuse their powers against my Right to Free Speech:

More info:

"[a] ... controversial and divisive issue..."  Only because online Jews are too often divisive themselves, creating unnecessary controversy with their emotionally disturbed, hateful, volatile reactions.  I think really, they just love the attention involved with "playing the victims".  They certainly do not garner any sympathy from me or from many others.

I got a message from Facebook, claiming that the above quoted post was "abusive" (or "something", because their reasoning was very vague and vanished right after I read it the first time) and that it violated their "community standards" and that it had "been removed" for that (or "some") reason, and that was supposedly the basis for my being "suspended"....  However, the post in question was NOT removed at all.  Nor should it have been, for that matter (as anyone can see if they just read it here, above).

Yet they banned (or rather suspended, with >>threats of future banning) me anyway, and it can only be because they hate Christians.  What other reason can there be for it?  Because, all I did was counter some misinformation someone had posted about who could or could not be a Jew (the poster claimed that a Catholic Pope could not be "Jewish", which is simply a lie).  Ignorant, racist, anti-Christ bastards.

Any idiot knows that the Christian faith grew out of the Jewish population, and that undoubtedly there are as many Christian Jews as not.  You absolutely, by definition, might be both Jewish AND Christian.  However, we Christian Jews are very tolerant of Judaism (thus, we have Zionism); whereas most online Jews typically seethe with hatred toward Christians and Christianity.  And they are wielding their enormous political power to abuse Individual Christians by violating our Civil Rights.  They are horrible bullies on the internet, and no doubt in person even worse.
I can see why Facebook is losing fans.  Mark Zuckerberg is a Corporatist asshole with White House connections.  What happened here is also a bad reflection on the Obama White House, in conjunction with Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook corporation.

Does Zuckerberg think that playing god and kissing Obama ass is going to save his company?

You recently posted something that violates Facebook policies, so you're temporarily blocked from using this feature. Learn More.

To keep from getting blocked again, please make sure you've read and understand Facebook's Community Standards.
The block will be active for 4 hours more.

If you think you're seeing this by mistake, please let us know.
[NOTE:  There is no real dialogue with Facebook about any accusations of wrongdoing, no due process, no chance to defend oneself.  When you try, it is like smacking into a brick wall over and over again.  You soon realize that you've 'been had'.  I'm sure the pansies get quite a thrill over wielding such technological power over mere mortal Human beings.  Such antics must be quite funny to them, considering their immaturity and low IQs.
The very fact that they get away with discrimination by picking and choosing selectively amongst whom they sanction, unfairly targeting some (ie Individuals, Christians and Women), while showing rank favoritism toward others (Pagans, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Homosexuals, Corporations, Government, etc.) proves that Corporatism is destroying Human Individuals' Rights right along with the world's Economy and other Resources, with blatant abuses of powers.
Being "banned" (actually "shunned", what Mormons do to people with whom they disagree -- in reality, these 'Corporations' are practicing their owner's or CEO's religions whenever they unjustifiably threaten and ban people from "open forums" while simultaneously enabling the truly abusive bullies  with whom they happen to agree) by Facebook, as with Amazon's Forums, GodLikeProductions, the DNA Forums, and other Corporate sycophants should really be seen as blessings rather than tragedies.  If they all ban me, I'll just create my own website and exclude every one of them.  Perhaps I'll even write books or pamphlets, publish them, print them, and simply give them away (like Thomas Paine or Benjamin Franklin).]