Search This Blog

Monday, October 1, 2012

My Hybrid Theory of Human Origins, with Graphics

I believe that sometime in ancient history, the true Human type (Homo Sapiens sapiens) bred females with males of certain Ape and Monkey species.  That's too shocking for most people to accept (and is equally overwhelming for me, rest assured).  However, I believe there's plenty of evidence to support my theory.  In my opinion, they did it for one of two reasons (or perhaps for both reasons, at different times):  1) To repopulate themselves after some major environmental catastrophe(s) nearly wiped out Mankind.... and 2) Later, to create "slave races", such as India's "monkey armies", etc.

Slavery has been an unpleasant issue for our species, for many millenia.  I have several books on the subject, most of which try to sugar-coat its history while laying blame for it on one particular race:  the so-called "white" (or Aryan) race.  Note that Aryan and Caucasoid are not quite synonymous.  I believe that Aryans were perhaps a slave race themselves at first, originally Neanderthals.

Cro-Magnon + Rhesus Macaque monkey = Neanderthal
Cro-Magnon + Chimpanzee = Denisovan
Cro-Magnon + Gorilla = Homo Erectus

(Perhaps the Orangutan, which carries AB bloodtypes, is some sort of Ape hybrid apart from Homo Sapiens).

The Neanderthal hybrid back-bred with Cro-Magnons to create most modern Europeans.

The Denisovan hybrid back-bred with Cro-Magnon to create Papua New Guineans, some Australoids, and some Polynesians, Indonesians and/or South Asians.

The Homo Erectus hybrid back-bred with Cro-Magnons to create most mainland Chinese.

The Neanderthal populations flowed back into Africa at various times, from whence I suppose Cro-Magnon may have originated.  I personally believe Cro-Magnon originated around the Mediterranean region (North Africa, the Caucasus region, etc.).  The Denisovan and Homo Erectus likely flowed outward from Africa; while the Neanderthal originated in India and flowed into other regions from there.

If Native Americans truly do have both Denisovan and Neanderthal genes (and I suspect they must have some Homo Erectus DNA also), it means that all of those populations (which may have included some purebred Cro-Magnons) flowed into the Americas at various times.

I suppose it's also possible that the Cro-Magnons were already situated in the American continents, prior to the invasions or immigrations of the Hybrid tribes.  To me that makes perfect sense, because other mammals once found in the Americas and currently extinct, such as the Camel, Horse, Tiger, Mammoth and Marsupials, now exist in different forms in places like Africa and Australia.  Perhaps all of those mammals including Human beings (ie Homo Sapiens) were once situated worldwide, and some simply became extinct at various times due to different climatic issues.

To me that suggests that Homo Sapiens, being more mobile than any other mammals, probably originated at various locations worldwide; then were affected by environmental issues and constant migrations.  In the midst of all those specific developments, some of them found it necessary or desirable to hybridize themselves with certain native Monkeys and Apes.  After the F1 generations of Human / Ape hybrids were bred, they simply kept back-breeding at least part of their populations with them.

I do not believe that Neanderthal, Homo Erectus, and Denisovan (or any other hybrid types) were "archaic".  That is, I don't believe they preceded Homo Sapiens (or, Cro-Magnon) chronologically.  However, they obviously had to precede "Anatomically Modern Humans".

Likewise, I don't consider those hybrids in any way "superior" to the true archaic Homo Sapiens, Human type.  They didn't survive because they're superior.  If they'd been superior, they would have displaced Humans completely.  Instead, they were subsumed or absorbed by the Human population.  That's why so many modern Humans carry their genes.  Some obviously have more than their share of some of them.

It's important to remember however, that Human DNA is typically dominant compared with Ape genes, within the parameters of Human / Lower Primate Hybridization.  "Dominant" means that only one copy from one parent is needed for the specific genetic trait to be expressed in the phenome of offspring.  Recessive traits (most of which are inherited from the relevant lower primate genes involved in Human Hybridization) require two copies, one from each parent, in order to express traits.

I believe geneticists need to take a cold, hard look at the genes of Gorillas, Chimpanzees, Rhesus monkeys, and other similar lower primates, which might have hybridized with Humans in the past.  They're already aware of the potential for hybridization with those species, because they talk about doing such experiments even now.  I say, it's already been done; and they need to make the necessary comparisons, in order to establish just how much of it has been accomplished so far.

I will now go on record, that I don't consider Human hybridization at all beneficial.  In fact, to me it was and continues to be, a tragedy for Mankind.

Also note, that the three known hybrid populations back-bred not only with Humans (Cro-Magnons), but also with one another, at different times and places throughout history.  In fact, today I wonder whether there are any pure Human or Cro-Magnon types left at all.

Stan Gooch, and others with their own Hybrid theories, express the belief that Neanderthal was once a separate and distinct species, which of course bred with Cro-Magnon or Homo Sapiens, resulting in Anatomically Modern Humans.  They believe that Neanderthals were killed and/or absorbed genetically by Homo Sapiens.  But, I don't believe Neanderthal was an original species; instead it, like Homo Erectus and Denisovan, were themselves hybrids.  They were the first generations, or F1 hybrid crosses between Homo Sapiens and Rhesus monkeys or Apes.

Modern Apes and Rhesus monkeys retain their original genomes for the most part (unless some Apes have hybridized with other lower Apes, which I don't doubt one bit), while Human genomes have been altered irreparably and indefinitely.  Although there have been some limitations involved in retaining the hybrid genes, matters of fecundity and fertility, etc. -- in the long run, enough of those genes survive today in the modern Human population to make AMHs entirely different from the original Homo Sapiens sapiens.  Not only is our species completely transformed from its original state as a whole, it is also fractured into scores upon scores of subspecies or subtypes -- all of them varieties of hybrids.

Anyone who can't feel sorrow concerning Man's hybrid biological history, cannot possibly have enough Humanity left in them to understand its implications.  Anyone who thinks it's quite alright, even kind of "cool", to be part Ape or Monkey -- probably is too much Ape or Monkey to think otherwise.

Personally, I think that Humankind is in far greater danger than most of us realize.  Somewhere along the way, we forgot what a true Human being really is.  Probably, the best parts of our intelligence, wisdom, and morality was bred out of most of us.  And those few who remain, are repeatedly assured from birth that "we're all Human beings".  So, even though many or most "Human beings" may not seem all that Human to some of us; we have no argument if we don't know the truth, the facts.  Not knowing, is like strolling through a forest full of Grizzly bears without a weapon for self-defense.  It's like swimming across the Pacific ocean without a life-preserver.  All our lives, we have simply assumed that those humanoid creatures we encounter daily are all Human beings, like ourselves.  That's what we've been told, anyway; and we had no reason, no evidence, to believe otherwise.  Some of us often wonder how it is that Human beings may behave so primitively, so beastly.  Now I know why.

And sorting out the genetic evidence for Humanity is going to be very difficult if not impossible, because that's one area of science that is most likely to be affected by bias and/or prejudice.  It's a question of identity, of ego; also of survival itself.  Everyone will certainly want to be classified as 'Human'; or, more Human than Hybrid... I quite expect those in power -- the powers that be, so to speak -- to proclaim themselves the "true Humans", or the "superior" ones.  So, I'm not looking to Science much, for the answers.  When it comes to defining Humanity, I have my own definition; and I'm sure it's quite different from theirs.

An outline of some of Stan Gooch's observations regarding differences in personality between Neanderthal types and Cro-Magnons.  Here, System A refers to his idea of the classic Cro-Magnon type; System B is how he saw Neanderthals.  Naturally, Hybrids are blends of both types (along with perhaps other types of hybrids, such as Denisovan and Homo Erectus).  Normally Human (Homo Sapiens) genes are dominant (require only one copy for expression of traits); however, the recessive Hybrid traits may be expressed whenever an individual receives two copies (one from each parent) of particular genes.  It is somehow quite relevant, which genes in an individual happen to express themselves as Human or otherwise, since most of them perform fairly specific, limited functions:

System A

System B

Stan Gooch was a real genius, but unfortunately for himself and for the world, a man far ahead of his own time.  I only learned about him this week, when writing this post.  I developed my Hybrid Theory completely independent from any others, in fact until I stumbled on it myself, I wasn't even aware that there was such a thing (I've only owned my own computor with internet, for about the last five years; and only began researching DNA and related subjects within the past ~three years).

However, since Dr. Gooch based his theory on the mistaken idea that Neanderthals preceded Homo Sapiens biologically (ie, that Cro-Magnons evolved from them), many elements of his otherwise very eloquent descriptions of Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons are exactly backwards.  Here is how I would list the various characteristics differently from his own conclusions, noted above:

System A (Cro-Magnon, or True Human Type):

  • Moon (Pre-Glacial period)
  • Neurosis (Reactions to Stress)
  • Intuition (Extra-Sensory Perception)
  • Religion (Spirituality)
  • Dreaming (Awareness of the Sub-Conscience)
  • Child (Innocence)
  • Day (Efficient Utilization of Resources)
  • God (Morality)
  • Female (Matriarchy)
  • Yin (Peace Highly Valued)
  • Communism (Fair and Equitable Treatment for All Individuals -- Love of Fellow Man, Love of Freedom)

System B (Neanderthal, or Hybrid Type):

  • Sun (Post-Glacial period)
  • Psychosis (Thrill/Sensation Seeking -- Based in an Inability to Feel, Whether Physically or Emotionally)
  • Logic (Reliance on Physical Senses at the Expense of Theoretical Thought -- Inability to Think "Outside of the Box")
  • Science (Materialism)
  • Awake (Hyper-Awareness of Physical Surroundings, Vigilance)
  • Adult (Alpha Male Idolatry; Sexual Promiscuity, Sexual Perversion, Homosexuality, Loss of Innocence, Cynicism)
  • Night (Restlessness, Obsessive Ambition, Acquisitiveness, Greed, Gluttony, OCD behavior)
  • Devil (Superstition)
  • Male (Patriarchy)
  • Yang (Aggression)
  • Fascism (Obsessive Need for Omnipotent Control; Slavery)

Gooch was a Psychologist, so he got some key points of the general differences in personality and physique exactly right.  But, he allowed the misconception which results from Darwinistic beliefs (Evolution especially) to lead him off course regarding other ones.  For example, he stated that Neanderthals were generally shorter, which is correct; but then he made the error of contributing the trait of male pattern baldness to Cro-Magnons, which is wrong.

It is quite possible that Gooch had a hard time maintaining objectivity if indeed he had considerable Neanderthal or other Hybrid DNA within his own genome.  Many people tend to hold in higher esteem, those traits with which they most identify -- whether they be good or bad, right or wrong.  Likewise, they tend to place negative labels (like "Neanderthal" or "Hybrid") upon people whose traits are polar opposites from their own -- regardless of the evidence.  And of course, in Gooch's day (when his books were published) there wasn't yet quite enough evidence.  Geneticists are still working -- very slowly -- on that problem.  However they seem to be getting warmer now; but they also seem fearful of what truths they might uncover in the process.
(Dwarfism and Hermaphroditism in Rhesus monkeys).
(Discusses Dwarfism and Hermaphroditism).
(Camptomelic dysplasia associated with true hermaphroditism).

When Deinekes doesn't wish to argue with you, they simply censor your comments.  I made the following comments to the above blog, on 18 Oct, 2012, the same day the blog was published.
A...""The main finding seems to be that the comparison with chimpanzee Y chromosome alone was misleading and that further comparison in the simian tree **(rhesus macaque)** actually found Y chromosomes very similar to those of our species."

"The macaque Y contained just one gene that humans have lost, and that gene resides on a particularly unstable portion of the Y. The human Y has grown much longe
r than the macaque’s, but the genes were **mostly the same**."

Human Rhesus negative bloodtype is compatible with Macaque blood, because it doesn't agglutinate when the two are mixed together.

I believe the Neanderthals were the first cross, F1 generation of Hybrids between particular female Humans x male Rhesus monkeys.

The male Neanderthal Hybrids may have been mostly sterile, but some may have produced offspring with other female Humans.

Due to blood incompatibility, many (but perhaps not all) of the female Hybrids probably were only able to bear one live infant to term, and only with a Human sire.

Any live offspring between two Hybrids probably weren't usually physically or mentally capable of producing healthy progeny.

"... the lack of mtDNA lineages of Neandertal origin..."

This is why I believe the female parents of the Hybrids were Human (Homo Sapiens, or Cro-Magnon).

" did the admixture take place?"

1- A desperate attempt to repopulate the Human species after some cataclysmic event, such as a supervolcano, ice age, or flood.

2- Slavery. They were deliberately bred to produce a 'slave race' so to speak, by the same Agriculturalists who created other hybrids like cattle, etc.

India's "monkey armies"."
B..."With regards to head and pelvic sizes and shapes, I just know that in the AMH population there are four basic types of female pelvis:

1- The so-called "Human" pelvis, the most commonplace type with the roundest shaped aperture. Found mostl
y among Caucasoid [["Aryan", "European", or "White" would have been a better choices of terminology, probably]] populations. This one generally has the easiest experience with childbirth. Officially called the Gynacoid pelvis.

2- The so-called "Ape" pelvis, with the aperture elongated from front to back. Found mostly among African populations. This one experiences many premature deliveries and other complications. Now known as the Anthropoid pelvis.

3- The so-called "Android" pelvis, which resembles a male pelvis. This one has the most difficulty at delivery, usually requiring C-section. Before the days of C-sections, many of these women would probably have died in childbirth.

4- The so-called "Archaic" pelvis. The most rare type, with an oval shape that runs laterally. This one very frequently results in a breech birth for the first delivery, and that of course might have been problematic in days before modern medical procedures. Now known as the Platypelloid pelvis. This pelvic type is more commonly found among Asian women than in the general population (more than 27% among Asian females).

In my opinion, in AMH populations all of these pelvic types probably represent the effects of some form of Hybridization or another, maybe even mixed types.

The same generality could be made about modern cranial shapes, because of the vast number of diverse types."
Another thing which troubles me about Deinkekes, is that despite his intense interest in the subject, he often censors my thoughts on his blogs.  I wouldn't put it past him to steal my ideas, and censoring certain of my comments while allowing other ones leads me to believe that's what he's doing.  This way he can take credit for my ideas, if any of them turn out to be proven correct.  All of my comments that have been censored by him, have been in regards to Human Hybridization and the Neanderthal Theory.  Every single one of them.

So, I asked him point blank:

C..."Are you censoring my comments on Human Hybridization and the Neanderthal Theory, for the purpose of stealing my ideas and taking credit for them if they should be proven correct?  I believe so, because there's a pattern there."

Of the three comments, only the third one has been published.  Oh well, one out of three is better than nothing I guess.

Here, he responded to my accusation:

Deinekes:  "I am deleting comments in violation of blog rules, since this is my blog, and I decide which comments are acceptable and which are not.

You are of course free to make your own blog and post whatever you want in it."

Now I'm convinced more than ever, that's what he's doing.

Unless, he finds my theories too controversial or ego-deflating to entertain on his blog, whether or not he chooses to reply to them.  Truth does hurt some people, for others like me it sets us free.  And if I happen to be wrong, what harm is there in simply discussing or just stating different possibilities?

"It is but sorrow to be wise, when wisdom profits not."  Tiresias

(Lots of good ones, here.)
UPDATE:  Deinekes has since posted racist comments by the hypocritical racist, Oetzi Jr, on the very same blog article, so I take it that's quite "acceptable" to him.  Also, these comments seem to be directed toward me, since I have both "brown eyes" and mtDNA W, supposedly ("Wilma", according to author Bryan Sykes) -- it's actually probably X2m1, since Family Tree DNA is lame-o.  Additionally, Oetzi Jr had to make quite a stretch of the facts himself, in order to label green or hazel eyes "brown":
"Notice how Wilma's eye colour changed from brown to blue.

- Brown.
- Blue.

On a palaeo-dating site I would not even bother anymore to check her pelvis size if she's already lying about something crucial as eye colour..."
On another note, it's really too bad that so many men base sexual selection more on material things like novel eye and hair colors, and on sizable dowries (ie money), instead of on Human traits like morality and intelligence.
(Oetzi had BROWN EYES and type O blood, lol.)

I can't help but notice that although the Oetzi carcass' mtDNA is known to science, they don't make it public; also, they have his entire genome but fail to state whether or not he had Rhesus negative bloodtype or any Neanderthal genes.  I really hate when scientists claim to have such information and draw certain conclusions from it, without publishing the actual raw data supposedly used by them for each case.

UPDATE: The ancient Oetzi carcass is said to possess quite a lot of Neanderthal genes (I'll try to relocate the link I found about it); so, go figure.

UPDATE:  I try once again to reach them on Deinekes (posted 10/23/2012 to the same article blog as above)...


According to David Reich of Harvard and MIT, at least some Humans might have / probably did breed with Chimpanzees.

So, my theory that original Humans (Homo Sapiens or Cro-Magnons, ie pre-AMH) bred with not just Chimps but also Gorillas and Rhesus monkeys (and perhaps other as yet unknown species) at various times throughout history is not all that far-fetched.  There's enough genetic evidence to support the theory.

Such hybridizations could explain the existence of the numerous and varied 'extinct' hominids of which we now have only a few of their bones.  Being F1 first cross hybrid generations, they would naturally have died out fairly quickly as soon as the inter-species breeding practices were discontinued.

UPDATE, 10/24/2012:  My comment wasn't published, so I can only assume that Deinekes wishes to perpetuate his own mythological, wishful thinking surrounding the mystery of the Neanderthal.  As I've mentioned before, people who know themselves to possess a quantity of Neanderthal genes seem hellbent on glorifying or romanticizing themselves through myth, fiction, and conjecture.  I personally don't know how much of it I possess (although I hope not much), despite the fact that mtDNA haplogroups W, I, and X have perhaps very unfairly been labelled "Neanderthal" by Eupedia and certain other hysterical, imaginative types.  It's altogether reasonable to assume that not all of the many subclades of those three mitochondrial groups may be rightly associated with Neanderthal genes, even if some of them might be.

I just can't help but wonder what they're so afraid of, that they won't even allow the theory to be discussed?  Is the truth that difficult to accept?  Or what if I'm wrong, and it isn't true after all?  I want to get to the bottom of the mystery; and I'm so tired of the so-called authorities pussy-footing, dancing around the issue, refusing to confront questions and ideas about it.  I'm equally fed up with all the hyperbole and the sheer hype they keep feeding the public.  They're hiding something, I know it.  The truth is right in front of our eyes, but they're throwing up smoke and mirrors and making a lot of noise, in order to distract us from it.  It can only be because they fear what the truth might do to their own public images.  They fear a loss of power and authority, if the facts come out about who and what they really are.  They're Hybrids, part animal... not fully Human.

He doesn't avoid the subject of Hybridization altogether, just studiously skirts around the issue of bestiality.  Bestiality is traditionally taboo of course, and rightly so... But does that mean we should pretend it has never happened?  Not in my book.  Incest is also taboo, but we know for a fact that in times past it has happened all too often.  Science tends to avoid acknowledging that unpleasant history as well.
Another good Anthropology blog, very informative.  This person, known as "Maju" in his comments, is another one who has received an overabundance of rude treatment from "Deinekes Pontikos".
Maju's political / social blog.
A blog which Maju has abandonned.  But, it seems to have interesting archives.

Here's a good one in Spanish.  Thank Google for translators.

Another good find.
(My comment was published this time, yeah!)

(He mentions that at some time in history the Neanderthal beast replaced or displaced Homo Sapiens within the Levant region.)

("The idea that this fossil tells us what the last common ancestor looks like is unfounded. Ardi is a spectacular discovery, but it may actually be an early side branch of hominids that is not even directly related to Lucy or humans. It’s naive to think every fossil you find is directly on the line leading to humans. And if we evolved from a monkeylike quadruped,” as Lovejoy’s analysis of Ardi’s hands suggests, “then all our extensive anatomy related to suspension and hanging would have evolved in parallel to the great apes. That’s possible but unlikely.”)

More proof that some of the "Human" population possesses Ape DNA.

UPDATE (11/29/2012): An exciting new breakthrough in yDNA knowledge.
(An excellent lecture by Mike Hammer.)
(Here, you can look up the DNA patterns for Chimps - 6RCUU, Gorillas - 9ED3A, and the new Human yDNA root - 6M5JA.  The new root is called A00, and is thought to be "closer to  Neanderthals or other archaic humans than we thought."  LMAO.
Dienekes was way ahead of me with this one.

Blood factors, such as "Diego" and "Rhesus" are going to be one of the main keys to solving the mysteries of Human origins.

Someone has opinions, criticisms about Rick Potvin... go figure.

Lol, he can't be serious; besides, he prescribes to the usual misconceptions.  I suppose it's possible that he's only as confused as most people.
This is a good one.
More; is he for real, or not?
Darwin's work is little understood, and often misquoted.
From a quick scan of this post, I gather that he was involved in Cryonics for many years, but grew disenchanted with the Jewish company to which he's paid a considerable amount of money.  Wow.  In my opinion, Cryonics is the Jewish Hybrid's atheistic attempt to attain immortality via their god: Science.

Another source I found through Potvin's website. Eric Hufschmid is linked through that site, too.

Good post.

I've conversed with Potvin on the above four posts at his blog... So far, he seems sincere; but I'm acutely aware of what good actors trolls can be, and I'm no longer the blindly trusting soul I used to be.  Call me paranoid, that's alright; I'd rather be overly vigilant than not enough.  I'm also painfully aware of all the rampant confusion everywhere, most of it due to lies, deception, propaganda and wars (which cause dire losses of historical records holding at least some truth).  I guess time will tell, whether or not he is for real (ie a bona-fide truth-seeker) -- or I might never figure it out, and I would have to accept that too.  Either way, it gave me an opportunity to explore some of my ideas concerning Hybrids in greater depth.  And too, his blog is rather interesting; he seems like a fairly interesting character.

Cryonics Cafeteria, wtf? Huh? Lol.
Very strange, indeed.
This YouTuber is associated with DeviantArt... Andrew Auernheimer. Hmm.  Also notice the mark of the Beast on his name (ie 666).

I've gotta admit, I'm learning a lot from Potvin.  I've heard about some of these theories already, of course... but, this website is new for me.

(Lol, he decided to use the Chimpanzee genome instead of Paleo-African, in his statistical studies.)

The controversy over the numbers of chromosomes possessed by Human beings, Hybrids, and lower Primates, should hold a major key to the puzzle of what defines a Human being.

From Genome: The Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters by Matt Ridley...

"Sometimes the obvious can stare you in the face.  Until 1955, it was agreed that human beings had twenty-four pairs of chromosomes.  It was just one of those facts that everybody knew was right.  They knew it was right because in 1921 a Texan named Theophilus Painter had sliced thin sections off the testicles of two black men and one white man castrated for insanity and 'self-abuse', fixed the slices in chemicals and examined them under the microscope.  Painter tried to count the tangled mass of unpaired chromosomes he could see in the spermatocytes of the unfortunate men, and arrived at the figure of twenty-four.  'I feel confident that this is correct,' he said.  Others later repeated his experiment in other ways.  All agreed the number was twenty-four.

"For thirty years, nobody disputed this 'fact'.  One group of scientists abandoned their experiments on human liver cells because they could only find twenty-three pairs of chromosomes in each cell.  Another researcher invented a method of separating the chromosomes, but still he thought he saw twenty-four pairs.  It was not until 1955, when an Indonesian named Joe-Hin Tjio travelled from Spain to Sweden to work with Albert Levan, that the truth dawned.  Tjio and Levan, using better techniques, plainly saw twenty-three pairs.  They even went back and counted twenty-three pairs in books where the caption stated that there were twenty-four pairs.  There are none so blind as do not wish to see.

"It is actually rather surprising that human beings do not have twenty-four pairs of chromosomes.  Chimpanzees have twenty-four pairs of chromosomes; so do gorillas and orang utans.  Among the apes we are the exception.  Under the microscope, the most striking and obvious difference between ourselves and all the other great apes is that we have one pair less.  The reason, it immediately becomes apparent, is not that ta pair of ape chromosomes has gone missing in us, but that two ape chromosomes have fused together in us.  Chromosome 2, the second biggest of the human chromosomes, is in fact formed from the fusion of two medium-sized ape chromosomes, as can be seen from the pattern of black strands on the respective chromosomes."

I get the feeling that like the Rhesus negative bloodtype debate, which itself involves so much obvious deception and misinformation on the parts of "authorities", there is far more to this story.

"I'm not naive enough to think that such an approach would reveal a "genius gene" they all possessed, but still, it is not inconceivable that something of interest about their origins -if not their genetic predispositions- might turn up."

Me:  Deinekes, I bet they don't want us to know that those geniuses had or have 24 pairs of chromosomes (instead of 23).

(... Since I mispelled his name, he probably won't post it, lol.)

UPDATE:  I was wrong again; he published it later -- yeah!!

Ashley Montagu's c1945 Introduction to Physical Anthropology book, in full text online. (He was born, "Israel Ehrenberg", and is the author of a grade-school Sociology textbook in my possession.)  By the way, the text was published by Osmania Universtity press (in India).

"The Osmania University is a public state university located in Hyderabad, India, founded in 1908.  It was established and named after the last Nizam of Hyderabad, Mir Osman Ali Khan.  It is one of the oldest modern universities in India."  [Wikipedia]

UPDATE:  The text actually was printed in the USA (my mistake), but not by any university apparently, although it cites Montagu as being a professor at Rutgers.  The book was actually found in a collection at the Osmania University library, instead.

Quoting from the Anthropology book:


"Secreting factors have been found in 78 per cent of Berlin whites, 84.2 per cent of New York whites, and 61.2 per cent of American Negroes.  It is also known that secreting factors are present in the anthropoid apes..."
"Even more valuable than the blood groups and the M-N blood types in the genetic investigation of mankind are the Rh blood types.

"When the blood of a rhesus monkey is injected into rabbits or guinea pigs a serum is obtained which has the property of agglutinating the blood of approximately 85 per cent of white persons, quite independently of the blood groups and M-N blood types to which they may belong.  Such persons possess an agglutinable factor of some complexity on the surface of their red blood corpuscles, and this (from the first two letters of the name of the rhesus monkey, in which it was discovered in 1937 by Landsteiner and Wiener) is now called the Rh factor.  Persons possessing this factor are said to be Rh-positive, persons lacking it are said to be Rh-negative.  We now know that there are three Rh factors, the original Rh , which is by far the most powerful and clinically most important, and rh', and rh".  Type rh blood lacks all three factors so that it can therefore be safely used in cases of intragroup incompatability due to Rh factors.

"The three elementary factors or antigens Rh , rh', and rh", have three theoretically possible contrasting factors designated Hr , hr' and hr".  Every blood possesses either an Rh factor or an Hr factor or both, derived from the pairs of allelic genes Rh -Hr () , rh'-hr', and rh"-hr".  The Hr factors are less antigenic (that is, less capable of stimulating the formation of specific reacting substances) than the Rh factors.  The three elementary Rh factors, it is now known, (together with the Hr factors hr' and hr") determine 8 agglutinogens, as shown in the following diagram:

"[Elementary factors]

"Until recently there were believed to be five Rh agglutinogens together with the blood type possessing no Rh agglutinogens, the rh type, determined by six major allelic genes designated R l, R 2 , R (}, r', r" y and r, the latter being the recessive gene in the series of six.  Since every person has but one pair of Rh genes, one derived from the maternal pair and the other from the paternal pair, the possible ways in which any of the six genes can be combined are 21.  In other words, 21 genotypes are possible which express themselves in eight Rh blood types or phenotypes.  The Rh type of the individual is therefore the expression of his genotype determined by a single pair of genes, each allele or member of the pair being derived from the opposite parent.  The 21 possible genotypes (not all of which are at persent serologically recognizable) and the eight Rh blood types are shown in Table 11.


"In reality there are probably more than a dozen Rh genes.  To the six principal allelic Rh genes which have been referred to above three recently discovered additional Rh genes must be added.  These are the genes r y , 7? lw , and R 7 , making a total of nine completely identified Rh genes, written, in italics, as follows: r, i f i r", r y , R, R 1 , R 2 , R }w , and R'.  The first four genes belong to the Rh-negative series of the gene rh, and the last five genes to the Rh-positive series of gene Rh.  Each gene determines a corresponding agglutinogen; in order to distinguish the latter from the former the agglutinogens are written un-italicized, the "h" of "rhesus" is retained, and subscripts are used, as follows: rh, rhi, rhn, rh y , Rh , Rh,, Rh 2 , Rh jw , and Rh z .  With nine Rh genes the number of theoretical Rh genotypes is increased to 45 with 24 corresponding serologically distinguishable phenotypes.  We need not, however, consider these theoretical possibilities here, since they would unnecessarily serve to complicate the picture, and most phenotypes are, in any case, rare.  Suffice it to say that of the three recently discovered genes, r y and R 7 are extremely rare in whites, r y being so rare that there is practically no data on it at all, though the suspicion is that it may occur less rarely in Mongoloids, while R 7 is known to occur in 3 to 6 per cent of Asiatics, American Indians, and Australian aborigines.

"The distribution of the Rh types in human groups promises to be anthropologically more enlightening than that of any other serological trait.  Something o this distribution in Samples of various populations may be seen from Table 12...

"It will be observed from Table 12 that type rh is absent or virtually so from the blood of all groups with known Mongoloid traits.  It will also be observed that there is a virtually complete absence of the type rh in the Australian aborigines and in the Papuans of New Guinea.  Furthermore, that while the distribution of the 8 Rh types in the Australian aborigines roughly resembles that seen in the Mongoloids, with the exception of a complete absence of type rh the pattern even more closely resembles that seen in whites.  This pattern is very different in the Papuans.  The Mongoloid plus Caucasoid character of the Rh blood types in the Australian aborigines is extremely interesting for the reason that the latter have usually been classified with the Archaic Caucasoid stock which is of more or less remote Asiatic origin.  In the character of their Rh blood types the Australian aborigines may therefore be exhibiting the evidences of a relationship with stocks of Mongoloid character on the one hand and Caucasoid character on the other.  The fact that the Australian aborigines are relatively high in Rh 2 is possibly suggestive of the Negroid component in their ancestry.  These brief remarks should serve to indicate the manner in which analysis of the blood types may be utilized in anthropological studies.  Already this type of analysis has served to indicate remote and unsuspected possible relationships among human groups, and to confirm some which have been suspected on other grounds.

"The Rh blood types promise to be among the most useful genetic traits in the study of the biological relationships of human groups, but it is only in combination with the analysis of many other genetically conditioned traits, and by an analysis of each of these traits in relation to the others that these types will have their greatest value.

"R. A. Fisher originally proposed the theory of eight genes with 36 genotypes as accounting best for the Rh blood types, and he suggests that we may, in fact, be dealing with 18 genes and 171 possible genotypes.  Should this ultimately prove to be true, then we would have in the genetic analysis of the Rh blood types one of the best methods for unravelling the relationships of the ethnic groups to one another."

"While some species of monkeys possess two of the three blood group factors, there is a striking tendency for many other species to exhibit but a single blood group, generally either A or B.  This is not the case in the anthropoid apes.  Thus, the two mountain gorillas thus far tested belong to group A, the 13 lowland gorillas thus far tested to group B.  Of the 108 chimpanzees tested 96 are A and 12 are O.  Out of 24 orangs tested nine were A, 10 were B, and five AB. The 11 gibbons tested yielded two A, seven B, and two AB.

"With the exception of 10 per cent of chimpanzees group O is lacking in the apes.  It is also of very low frequency among the monkeys.  In man group O occurs in all populations in frequencies varying from 50 per cent to as high as 100 per cent of the O gene.

"On the basis of these facts it could be argued the stock from which man, in common with the great apes, was derived, possessed all four blood groups, and that different genes suffered extinction in different isolates of apes and of early man.  In such case the pattern of distribution of the blood groups in early man would have been the same or very similar to what it is among the anthropoid apes today.  From this we would have to conclude that the present distribution of the blood groups was, in man, brought about by intermixture or hybridization.  Furthermore, it could be argued that blood group O in man was originally of very low frequency, and probably limited to a few groups, being subsequently diffused through hybridization.  On the other hand it could be argued that these differences indicate that man is only remotely related to the anthropoid apes.

[Note that bloodgroup O is another important piece of the puzzle.]

"The blood of all chimpanzees thus far tested contains agglutinogens similar to but not identical with the human agglutinogens M and N.  The orang-utan, the gibbon, and the catarrhine monkeys exhibit M agglutinogens of progressively more different kinds.  An M-like agglutinogen has been found in only one species of platyrrhine monkey."

"The Rh blood type has been determined in 15 chimpanzees, in each case proving to be Rh negative. The indication gains strength that the Rh negative blood type constitutes a relatively recent mutation in man's biological history, appearing possibly in the upper paleolithic somewhere in western Europe."

"FIG. 118. Blood groups of the Basque People. (From Chalmers, Ikin, and Mourant. Courtesy, Am. j. Phys. Anthrop.}

"This suggestion has recently been rendered more than plausible by the discovery that the linguistically unique Basque people are characterized by an extraordinarily high frequency of the Rh negative gene.  In a total of 250 Basques Etcheverry (1947) found that 35.6 per cent were Rh negative.  This is more than twice the highest percentage hitherto known for any human group.  In a sample of Basques Chalmers and his co-workers (1949) found the percentage to be 29.0 per cent.  The Basques as well as populations containing a large Basque element show a high frequency of group () persons.  In this they resemble Icelanders, Scots, Irish, northern Welsh, and Sardinians.  The Basques, however, are unique among all the peoples of Europe in their very low frequency of group B.  Such facts together with their extraordinarily high Rh negative constitution suggest that the Basques are a relict population which has remained isolated from the general stream of western Euro-
pean admixture.

"It is of interest to mention here that in 1945 Boyd and Montagu by plotting the distribution of Rh gene frequencies on a small scale map, were led to conclude that the highest frequency of Rh negative was to be found in the borderland region between northern Spain and southern France.  Boyd and Montagu also concluded that it seemed probable that the Rh negative gene originated in a population in this general region.  Mourant (1947) and Etcheverry (1947) independently suggested that the Basques are the present-day representatives of a population from which the Rh negative gene in Europeans is derived."

[NOTE that I don't necessarily agree with Montagu's and other's conclusion about the origin of the Rhesus negative gene among Basques or among any ancient populations of Homo Sapiens.]

The quotes above were copied and pasted from the online Archive, an excellent source of history.  But one must remember that the texts collected on that website have mostly been scanned in electronically, so they do contain a few typographical errors in them.  I would love to get my hands on the original copy of that book.
I agree; analysis of the Romani people (like Native Americans) is crucial to solving the puzzle of Human Origins.

Potvin believes they're a hoax apparently.  I'm not sure what to believe about their authenticity; but if they're real, I'm certain they're terrestrial Hybrids, not Extraterrestrials or 'Anunnaki'.  Also keep in mind, that Potvin claims nuclear power is a "hoax".

A discussion about Australian aborigines, their alleged Rhesus negative bloodtype status, and their alleged 71% relationship to Neanderthals.  This aligns with Ashley Montagu's (aka Israel Ehrenberg's) observation concerning the Australians, about which I wasn't quite sure.  In neither case (Basques or Australian aborigines) do I conclude that the Rhesus negative gene is in any way original to Human beings.  However, like bloodgroup O, the Rhesus negative gene is a recessive trait; and in some populations they're correlative.  I think it would be very helpful at this point, to see some unbiased scientific studies comparing the blood and genetic traits of Human beings and other Primates, particularly the Apes and Monkeys.  Such studies seem very difficult to find on the internet.

Found on Rick Potvin's blog; an article about mixed DNA.  "What is a Jew?"

A little off-topic, but found on Potvin's blog.  Wilhelm Reich is yet another intelligent, honest and Humane Jew who was rejected, persecuted by his own people.  Others were Arthur Koestler, Erich Fromm, Jesus of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and many others...

Charted comparison of Neanderthal, African, and European DNA.
Full text of the study.

"East Eurasians more Neanderthal than Europeans."  -- Fits my theory perfectly.

He raises some interesting questions, which of course I could expound on, lol.

Looks like I've attracted negative attention for my ideas, lol.  That's nothing new, in light of all the negativity that's out there, especially among the narrow-minded and brainwashed.

I realize it's asking a lot for people to even consider the possibilities I present here; I didn't want to believe it, either.  I still don't like it, but it seems to be the only rational explanation for the way things are.  Furthermore, this sharing of my blog post could be the work of a (Hybrid) troll.  It's a Portuguese discussion forum, called the "Skeptics Club".  That reeks of Andrew Auernheimer and DHS.

Humans and Apes coexisted as separate species originally; then some were bred together, creating Hybrids.  Then, the Hybrids continued breeding with some other Human beings and some other Hybrids (they fornicate, rape, constantly).  Some Hybrids eventually became extinct; while others survived as their DNA became subsumed within "Anatomically Modern Human" populations.  At this point, I'm not certain whether or not any pureblooded original types of Human species exist anymore.  It's a concern for me; I really want to know.

Hybridization of Humans with Apes has completely deranged our civilizations, our societies.  Practically all of our global problems are the result of ancient Pagan bestial practices.  It's brought about the near extinction of the Human race, and the near total destruction of the entire planet Earth.  Hybrids are no longer made in the "image" of God, the Creator of Humanity.  Hybrids are made in the "image of the Beast".  The "Mark of the Beast" is in their DNA markers.

From the first chapter of Genesis:

"And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

"And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

"And God said, Let us make man [Humans] in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

"So God created man [Humans] in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

"And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

"And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat [food].

"And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.

"And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.  And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."

Exodus 22:19 -- "Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death."

1 Corint:hians 15:38-39 -- "But God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to every seed his own body.  All flesh is not the same flesh:  but there is one kind of flesh of men [Humans], another of beasts [animals, not Human], another of fishes, and another of birds.

1 Corinthians 15:49 -- "And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly."

2 Corinthians 3:17-18  "Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

"But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass [mirror] the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord."

The "Beast" of Revelation is a symbol, a metaphor for the sub-Human Hybrids existing among us. "666" is metaphorical for DNA.  The "Mark of the Beast" is found in Hybrids' DNA; in their DNA markers. The anti-Christ is the mind and character of the "Beast".  The Serpent (also known as the Dragon), worshipped and enslaved by Hybrids, is Satan: the liar, deceiver, and sexual deviant.  "For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie."

"And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:"

"And the dragon [serpent] was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed..."

"...which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ."

"I... saw a beast rise up out of the sea ...and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy."

"And they worshipped the dragon [serpent] which gave power unto the beast..."

"...and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with him?"

"And it was given unto him [the Beast] to make war with the saints, and to overcome them..."

"...and power was given him [the Beast] over all kindreds [tribes], and tongues [languages], and nations."
"And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him [the Beast], whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb [Jesus Christ] slain from the foundation of the world."
"If any man have an ear, let him hear."
Note: the Beast, ie organized Hybrids, intend to ruin communications however they can, to prevent Mankind from obtaining truth.
"If any man have an ear, let him hear [God promises]:   He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity...
"...he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword.  Here is the patience and the faith of the saints."
"And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon [evil, lies]... And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him...
"..and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed."
"And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men [Mankind]...
"And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast...
"...saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast...
"...which had the wound by a sword, and did live."
"And he [the second Beast] had power to give life unto the image of the [first] beast, that the image of the beast should both speak...
"...and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed."
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond...
" receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads...
"And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the markor the name of the beast, or the number of his name."
"Here is wisdom.  Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast...
"...for it is the number of a man; and his [the Beast's] number is Six hundred threescore and six..."
"And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Zion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand...
"...having his Father's name written in their foreheads."
"...And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts [note that these "four beasts" are different from the evil one spoken of separately in Revelation; I gather that these four are not evil -- not all "beasts" are evil, only Human Hybrids], and the elders...
"...and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth."
"...These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth...
"...These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb."
"And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth...
"...and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people...
"Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come...
"...and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters."
"And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city...
"...because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication...
"And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice...
"If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand...
"The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation...
"...and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb...

"And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night...

"...who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name...

"...Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus."

"...And I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvellous...

" angels having the seven last plagues; for in them is filled up the wrath of God...

"And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire...

"...and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his [the Beast's] image, and over his [the Beast's] mark, and over the number of his name...

"...stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God...

"...And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying...

"...Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints...

"...Who shall not fear thee, O Lord, and glorify thy name? for thou only art holy...

"...for all nations shall come and worship before thee; for thy judgments are made manifest...

"...And after that I looked, and, behold, the temple of the tabernacle of the testimony in heaven was opened...

"...And the seven angels came out of the temple, having the seven plagues...

"...and no man [Human] was able to enter into the temple, till the seven plagues of the seven angels were fulfilled."

So in my opinion, the World is corrupt and chaotic because some of our ancestors disobeyed God by producing Hybrid races via bestiality.  In that way, creating humanoid monsters, thereby triggering innumerable genetic mutations, they introduced evil into the World.  Genesis says Mankind was created by God [heavenly father] in his own image.  But Hybrids are made at least partly in the image [ie DNA] of beasts.  Once corrupted, Human DNA can never be the same as before.  As a mule is the hybrid product of a horse mare and donkey stallion, it's neither horse nor donkey... it's a completely different creature.  Likewise, a person's DNA markers reveal whether or not they carry the "Mark of the Beast".

"...count the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man [Human]... 666" -- The mark of the beast is a number, and it is a mark"

I think that has to mean DNA; and that "the Beast" symbolizes something very real, not just some figure of speech:  it's symbolic of Human / Ape Hybrids.  That's why I believe, and Science has proven before (although it's now being covered up), that Neanderthals, Denisovans, and other hominid, Human sub-species did not predate original Human beings (Homo Sapiens) chronologically.  We didn't "evolve" from them; rather, we (some or most, I'm not sure which yet) descended from some of them, so although they're ancestral to an unknown percentage of the "Anatomically Modern Human" population, they were in fact preceded by the original Humans.  Original Humans --> Human / Ape Hybrids --> "Anatomically Modern Humans".  Humans came first before those monstrous creatures.  The Government wants us to believe a lie:  ie that Neanderthals, etc., were ancestral to all Humanity.  They want us to believe that those Hybrid monsters were natural, instead of the truth:  they were instead man-made, via bestial practices.  Because, so many in Government carry those Hybrid genes in their DNA... they bear the Mark of the Beast in their bodies' cells.

"Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of [Hu]man, and with the seed of beast."  JEREMIAH 31:27

(see also, verses 28-37, where the scriptures clearly indicate a very close and special relationship -- or "covenent" -- between God and Israel alone, aside from Judah).

The Illuminati are aware of the truth about themselves (because they in fact maintain their memories, history and culture through the heavy and strict utilization of ceremony, symbolism, and ritual); and they're proactively, diligently working through the media, public compulsory education, and other avenues of propaganda, to spin the facts, distort the truth, and to "normalize" what ought to be a shockingly overwhelming reality.  In other words, they're brainwashing the Public, Human and Hybrid alike, to accept the fact that we're not "all Human beings", after all.  At the same time, they're avidly presenting Neanderthals, Denisovans, and other hominid Hybrids as "Humans" of diverse 'flavors'.  And that's why it seems to many of us lately, that we now inhabit a surreal sort of Twilight Zone episode.

Like the Serpent, "more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made" -- they're lying to us.  And because so many of us find the lies more palatable than the truth, we're easily deceived. In that way, we "love" the lies.  However, long ago I realized that although the lies and delusions might sound sweeter emotionally, they're in fact very destructive to the mind, body, and soul.  That's when I firmly resolved to seek out truth and reality, regardless of the consequences.

Truth and reality can be a lot harder to handle, overwhelming at times, which I suppose is why some people claim that it "hurts".  But it doesn't hurt as much as lies and delusions do.  Instead it sets us free, if we can just be honest and rational enough to handle it... and I love Freedom, too.

Another important point to keep in mind is the relationship between the Pagan practices of Serpent / Phallus Religions or Worship with lies, sexual deviance, Eugenics, Genocide, and so on.

I've been censured, punished, even persecuted many times, for speaking the truth.

A documentary on the subject of psychopathy.

They invent their personas; ie, they're not authentic.  They're actors, performers.  They pretend to be whatever they believe you would like for them to be.  They have no remorse or guilt, none whatsoever.  They often intentionally seek to evoke pity from Human beings, by playing on your Human feelings.  They are deceptive about their histories.  High levels of testosterone in both, male and female psychopaths.

I believe it is genetic; I believe they're Hybrids.

They have to invent their personas, because they possess no real Human feelings or thoughts of their own.  Here in this video, they're described as "intra-species predators".  They are indeed predators; but, they're not really the same exact species as true Human beings.

No remorse or guilt, because they possess no Human feelings.  They operate entirely on animal instinct.  Interacting with Hybrids is a lot like encountering Chimpanzees or Gorillas, Monkeys.  They're opportunistic survivalists.  They attack Humans, because we're not like them (more intelligent, more moral, even more physically attractive); they fear us for that reason.  Another important reason they attack, is for physical or material gain.  I call them "bottomless pits" because they are so high maintenance, so intellectually impoverished, so lacking in really practical life skills, so wasteful of resources, and so emotionally destitute.

The author estimates only 4%  (1/25) of the general population is psychopathic; but I think it's more like 1/4 (25%).

Human beings are nothing more than objects, servants, slaves or toys, to them.  They have no regard for a person's Humanity, Divine or Civil Rights, feelings, thoughts, beliefs, ideas, personality, etc.  They habitually idealize others, expecting others to be perfect for them, to meet all of their own (psychopath's) needs.  In the deluded, twisted, subHuman minds of psychopaths, people merely exist to serve them or to provide them with entertainment or material resources.  If their victims don't meet all the psychopath's needs, the psychopath begins to devalue the victim.  They always project their own faults, hatred, etc., onto their victims.

Through manipulative behaviors such as social or physical isolation (often achieved by means of smear campaigns, slander, bullying, stalking, or by economic or physical abuses) and 'gaslighting' (attempts to undermine confidence and esteem by making victims both, feel and appear, "crazy" or inept, incompetent)... they always seek to gain complete control over their victims.  Destroying people sadistically gives them a thrill, an adrenalin rush; and they are always bored, always seeking excitement, entertainment.  Like Apes or Monkeys, they don't have much intelligence to keep them preoccupied, so they always look outward for mental and physical stimulation, satisfaction.

The present civilization, society and economy are a perfect environment for psychopaths, because they were created by psychopathic leaders.

They lie constantly; pathological liars.  Unoriginal; they are mimics, mimes, imitators:  "Monkey see, monkey do".  And they are quite addicted to Fantasy, Glamour, Illusion, Drama... Like all gangsters (and many kinds of animals), they usually operate (ie hunt for prey) cooperatively in packs, teams, groups or "hives" -- although they have no problem also acting alone at times, with the knowledge that their "friends" will help them cover up their crimes.

Testosterone.  That supports my belief that psychopathy (and Patriarchy as well) is a Hybrid, physiological, genetic trait or condition.  Female confinement rituals, male superiority, "Alpha" male worship, primogeniture, polygamy, harems, eunuchs (castration), slavery, circumcision, monarchy, homosexuality, prostitution and pimping -- all are psychopathic and Patriarchal behaviors.

Someone claiming to be in law enforcement waking up to the fact that there is something very inhuman about our Government, military these days.  Reporting teams of "assassins" being formed; and questioning the DNA, genetics of at least some of the younger recruits.

Dune... Fear is the Mindkiller...""Not all specimens of Homo sapiens are Humans, Frank Herbert understood."

I learned about Dune from Andrew Auernheimer.  I wasn't aware how much of a cult classic it is, among certain individuals and groups.  The Troll was very into it.

Comment I made to Dienekes' about the above video:  "They're exposing how applications of mathematical / computer statistics may sometimes be severely flawed science; and how it might be distorted in order to support certain preconceived ideologies.  (ie Garbage in, garbage out.)  Intuitively I knew that, but it's good to hear someone actually seriously challenging it with clear explanations, examples.  The origins of Indo-Europeans is too important a topic to ignore, exagerate, romanticize, idealize or treat lightly."

Propaganda, lauded by another propagandist, Ashley Montagu (see discussion about Montagu in my Freemasonry: Our State Religion post.

UPDATE: My comment was published, along with several others.

Another academic lecture on the same subject.

I like this blogger, whoever it is... marvelously sharp and well-spoken intellectual.

A blogger who connects C. G. Jung with Yoga.  Hmm, not very surprising, really.

More propaganda.

I think this is interesting, because since Man is a Mammal, there should be certain parallels between us and the Beasts of the world, geographically (but also chronologically and other aspects, of course).

Lots of Human genome data.

Using Rhesus Macaques as stand-ins for Humans, how appropriate (if you're a Hybrid).

My comment concerning Human Hybridization with Apes got published here, finally broke through to them!

"George" says, [Uralic speaking... and Moksha] "Erzya->Mordva->Mordhvar->Androphagi
Androphagi in Herodotus times originated to the west of the Northern part of the river Don."

Referencing androphagi in association with the R1a1a (yDNA) tribes, something which I have no trouble believing.

They're still puzzling over it, because they're not willing to entertain the thought of alternate theories to their interpretation of Darwin.

There are entire races of so-called "modern" Humans, whose foreheads do not bulge at all; quite the contrary, they are very slanted inward.


Jeremiah 31:27 ~ "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast.


Certainly not pigs; but technically Ape Hybrids are a possibility.  Of course, this doesn't exclude the fact that Arabic peoples are also probably Hybrids of some types.

Another serious blogger who explores the subject of Human Origins, "Marnie".

I commented on this one, so we'll see if Dienekes' publishes it.  (He published it right away, yippee!)  I want people to at least be open-minded about the possibility, and if they can conclusively prove to me that I'm wrong about it, that's fine with me.  But, something has to explain the fact that Human beings have DE-volved, rather than improved or E-volved.

Australian mtDNA and its implications regarding Human Origins Theory.

This clarifies the rumors surrounding the Cherokee turban fad.
Search results for "mtDNA X".

I've been saying for quite some time, that their presuppositions are errant.

Reverse side of the same disk is also covered with elaborate diagrams.

Beginning at 47:37 the Embryological / Genetical Disk from Colombia is explained.  Immediately following that explanation, he shows the audience a knife and another medical instrument called a 'spoon', both used specifically for childbirth.  The knife was used to cut umbilical cords; the 'spoon' was used in transverse or breech presentations, to help remove infants from mothers' wombs.  I'm sure that might also be helpful in cases of large or oddly shaped infant craniums.  All three items are finely crafted from the mineral, Ludite[?].  The narrator points out the strange configuration of the faces / heads of some of the creatures shown on the Disk.  No one can understand why they look so different from normal Humans, but I believe I know the answer:  they are actually subHuman, Lower Primates (such as Monkeys or Apes).  I believe this stone is evidence of ancient experiments in Human / Ape Hybridization, and that it was created as a sort of textbook reference for their priests, doctors, etc.

The Illuminati are also very interested in the subject of breeding, eugenics, of course.

Evidence of ancient Agricultural societies, other than the Cherokee, in North America.  Too many people falsely believe and perpetuate the notion that all Native Americans were nomadic Hunter-gatherers like the Plains Indians.

Science does not support the Aryan Invasion of India theory.

Just in today; this figure is quite identical to the weird looking ones on the Disk above -- the ones I compare to Monkeys or Apes.

I commented on this one, since they were engaged in a lively debated over the Aryan Invasion Theory.  Don't know yet, whether my opinion was published. [It was.]

Flavius Josephus speaks of an extinct race of Giants in Book V, Chapter 2 of his Antiquities of the Jews.

Other sources describe those Giants as having existed Post-Flood or Post-Diluvian.  That's what I believe; that they were actually bred by Human Hybridization with Apes, etc. -- after the Flood, in other words, after the Ice Age melted off and the Earth began to warm back up.  I'm sure that Toba and other supervolcanic eruptions are what caused at least one Ice Age (the most recent one, maybe).  It seems that North America also suffered a big Meteor strike (or maybe it was some other supervolcano, now extinct, who knows?).  Perhaps the North American Event occured around the same time as the Toba event, who knows?

On the other hand... those Giants might instead have actually been the last lingering remnant populations of true, original Human beings!  I have yet to figure that one out.  Perhaps after the Flood, and after Humans had bred with particular Lower Apes and Monkeys, the Hybrids then waged genocide on the Giants (hypothetically, the true Human beings)?!  That seems altogether plausible to me.  There are similar legends among contemporary "Native Americans".

"Figure 41: The Missippian culture centered around *agriculture* and earthen monuments."
Mississippian Dog Effigy in pottery.
Believed to have existed mainly in the time period between 800 CE and 1500 CE... But who knows for how long or for how many 'extinct' civilizations Agriculture was the dietary cornerstone of North America?

Bhagavad Gita -- As It Is

Srimad Bhagavad Gita; not sure what the difference is from the above linked text.  Both have eighteen chapters, so maybe just varying translations or interpretations of the scriptures.

Holy Cow!! You can listen to the text sung in the original Sanskrit here!

"And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,

"That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose."  Genesis 6:1-2

All in Russian; will need help translating.

Of most interest to me, is the date of Indo-Europeans

A gigantic ape standing 10 feet tall and weighing up to 1,200 pounds lived alongside humans for over a million years, researchers say. A fresh analysis of two previously found skulls determined they re 200,000 old, making them the oldest known examples of our species. Yet fossil records indicate musical instruments, drawings, needles and other sophisticated tools didn t appear until about 50,000 years ago, suggesting Homo sapiens had a pretty lowbrow culture for 150,000 years. Well, evolution takes time. Another team found the fossilized remains of what they think is humankind s first walking ancestor, from 4 million years ago. Other research confirmed that the oldest human ancestor, from the time when we split with the apes, lived around 6 million years ago. Oh, and you have to respect our relatively recent ancestors (the lowbrow folks) who we now know lived among 10-foot-tall gorillas that have since gone extinct. Maybe they were so busy running they had no time to paint or create alphabets.
(McMaster University)

Another point of interest, is that Human beings are rumored (I say rumored, because it's being covered up by the scientific and governmental communities) -- to have been a far taller stature in ancient times, compared to the present day.

I rounded up what I could, on Jim Vieira; not sure if some of it is repetitive.

(Blogger is a "literary gadfly", who discovers antiquarian and rare books in flea markets, etc.)

Another great blog.

Reports of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, complete with numerous descriptions of GIANT SKELETONS... So, why have they since gone into complete denial about them?  What are they hiding?

This study revolutionizes the usual, standard beliefs concerning the origins of dogs.  Up to now, most people believed dogs originated in the Levant / Africa and Eastern Asian regions.  Since extinct forms of other mammals such as Camels, Tigers, Elephants (ie Mammoths), even Horses, etc., have been found in the Americas, it stands to reason that Dogs were also here.

 Falklands Island Wolf, now extinct.

Giant North American Camels, now extinct.

Ancient Dog skull analysis.

Linguistic analysis of the Aryan Invasion Theory.

Greater divergence between the Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes, than between any Modern Human groups.  That sounds very meaningful to me, in light of the fact that particular types of Modern Human individuals carry DNA from either one, or both, hybrid subspecies.  Of course, I'm not really sure how to interpret that particular information, at least not yet.

Scores of reports of Giant skeletons found all over North America have been the subject of intense cover-ups, because that fact does not support the supposed "Theory of Evolution."  So much for 'science'.

Obviously, I disagree with the Knights Hospitaller Templars (who incidentally admit to their Neanderthal origins).

"Finally, among primates, human [blood] serum dissolves the corpuscles of fishes, frog, snakes, pigeon, fowl, night-heron, horse, swine, ox, rabbit, guinea-pig, dog, cat, hedgehog, and lemur.  The effect of human [blood] serum was tried upon the blood of six species of apes (the platyrhines, Pithesciurus sciurcus, Atoles ater; the catarrhines, Cynocephalus babuin, Macacus sinicus, Macacus cynomolgus, and Rhesus nemestriuus, at the Berlin Zoological Garden).  In all cases the Human [blood] serum dissolved the ape corpuscles.  The serum of Macacus had no effect upon the blood of some persons [ie some humans], while the blood of others was quickly dissolved by it.
Among the true anthropoid apes is first found blood which is physiologically equivalent to that of man... It is well known that the horse and ass, dog and wolf, rabbit and hare readily cross [ie breed offspring].  It would be a valuable experiment to attempt by means of artificial fertilization, a cross between the rat and mouse, or between the domestic cat and the ocelot [or, between Humans and Apes??? -- I'm already on record stating that it has already been done, in ancient history].  The physiological similarity of the blood of either pair of animals points toward the possibility of a successful crossing.