Search This Blog

Saturday, June 2, 2012

FREEMASONRY -- Our State Religion
An excellent website run by former Masons.  According to them, Freemasonry is undoubtedly a religion.  I believe as they do, that it's a false religion; however my concern is that they control our governments and practice covert discrimination against "outsiders" (their own terminology).

According to Charles A. Beard (1874-1948), American historian (The Republic, c1943) , "Congress can make no law respecting an establishment of religion.  This means that Congress cannot adopt any form of religion as the national religion.  It cannot set up one church as the national church, establish its creed, lay taxes generally to support it, compel people to attend it, and punish them for nonattendance.  Nor can Congress any more vote money for the support of all churches than it can establish one of them as a national church.  That would be a form of establishment."

He further states, "We may have in a great national crisis a straight military dictatorship under the President or a joint committee of Congress.  But I believe that it will prove to be temporary if it ever comes.  The idea of our repeating all the mental imagery, ideas, rhetoric, sentiments, and hocus-pocus of totalitarianism in Germany, Russia, or Italy seems to me so highly fanciful as to be purely speculative, for America has not been and never can be Russia, Germany or Italy, through whatever variety of untried being we may pass in the indefinite future."
Unfortunately, Mr. Beard was far too optimistic regarding that possibility.  Also, like many other intellectuals, his career was ruined solely by virtue of some 'unpopular' political opinions, especially his views regarding the causes of WWII.

"Charles A. Beard's Economic Interpretation of the Constitution (1913) argues that members of the Constitutional convention were members of the elite, land speculators and holders of large amounts of paper money who would benefit from a strong government that could honor bonds and paper money."

According to the Masons' own "History", Freemasonry is obviously a religion, a practice of sorcery.  Most of the book relates in great detail their loves of symbolism, mythology, deception, secrecy, power, material wealth, hedonism and magic or alchemistry.  They admit that Freemasonry is based in Hermetic Qabalism, and that their elite members are "Jewish".  On their title page is a depiction of the signing of the Declaration of Independence; their frontispiece is a very fine engraving of Benjamin Franklin, one of America's earliest Masons of prominence and fame.  Nearly everyone is aware that our first recognized President, George Washington, was a Freemason.  So was Thomas Jefferson and most of our other Presidents.  Thomas Paine on the other hand, another of our founders and a determined freedom fighter (Rights of Man, The Age of Reason), was anti-Masonry and suffered disgrace, harassment and persecution from Washington and the rest, for his intelligent opinions.
(An excellent biography of Paine is "Rebel!", c1974, by Samuel Edwards; in it he reveals Mr. Paine's anti-Masonic sentiments.)

"The Jews made no converts; they butchered all." (Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason)

"It was the Jews who dishonored God. It was the Gentiles who glorified Him. (Thomas Paine)

Thomas Paine was a man whose brilliant intelligence lifted him out of obscure poverty and into history books.  Though he physically resembled his Church of England (Episcopalian) mother, it was his Quaker father whom he favored philosophically.  Although he had great difficulty attaining happiness through marriage, he nevertheless spoke out in favor of Rights for women.  In his time (as always, really) women were generally viewed as chattel and not as equal Human beings, by most men.  He also fought against cruelty to animals; and was opposed to the institution of Slavery. 

Inside the front cover of the old volume that I studied as one of my main sources for this essay, a complete history of Freemasonry by the Masons themselves, published nearly 125 years ago, is handwritten the name of the book's original owner:  Mrs. Isidor Jacobs -- quite obviously a Jewish surname.

Yet strangely enough, within the book are many references to Catholic institutions, such as the Crusaders, Knights Templar, the order of Benedictines, king Richard the First of England (a prominent Crusader against the Muslims), the Rosicrucians and St. Bernard of Clervaux.  The authors clearly and solidly link the Roman Catholic church with the Jewish Illuminati.

This same exact print is included in "History of Freemasonry, Vol. II".  Notice the creepy fixation on death, as played out in their initiation rituals.

(Freemasonry takes on a variety of forms, like a chameleon.)
(Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, another secret society, exclusive fraternity, steeped in heraldric imagery and tradition.)
(Another of their factions.  As I've mentioned before, lots of infighting amongst all types of Freemasonry related fraternities.  The KKK has been very heavily infiltrated by Jews and the government, too.  I really believe they're a front, for the purpose of destroying American civilization.)

And what religion do Freemasons really practice?  The answer is that it's a "secret society" based in Pagan Pantheism, whose primary goal is to enslave the general population, including most of their own dues-paying members.  It's a 'mind cult', in other words.  Another word to describe it, is "con-game".

In recent years I've discovered just how evil Freemasonry and Freemasons are.  They're like a Mexican drug cartel only far worse, because they've been around much longer and have more political influence, power and money.  They're easily recognizable, especially for someone like myself, yet due to all the secrecy in which they engage, I continued to have many unanswered questions about them.  For instance, who are they?  And if their leaders really are as they seem to be:  Jews (by blood lineage), one of the most exclusive ethnic groups, very inbred -- then why do they seem to be everywhere?  I also wondered whether the leaders of Freemasonry were also the mysterious entity commonly known as the "Illuminati", and the answer is yes, they are.

They are little more than a crime syndicate, a 'mafia'.  Or perhaps more specifically the head organization above most all the world's crime families.  I also find that they are "joiners":  they form many associations, clubs, groups, etc.  Like a matrix... they have 'connections'.  And they always insist that initiates take certain oaths which are slightly modified depending somewhat on the particular venue.  If you're one of them, you're 'family' (the kind of family who lies, cheats, and steals for one another) -- and subject to disciplines for misbehavior which may include removal of privileges, loss of rank, social ostracism, or outright banishment (among others).

At one of our local municipal parks, "Washington Park", in a town of barely 17,000 population, is prominently erected a billboard advertising the following nationally or internationally established fraternal organizations.  These same identical types of billboards are found on public property in practically every town and city in the United States:

Ancient Order of Free and Accepted Masons
(They claim that between 80,000 and 200,000 Freemasons were killed during the Holocaust, yet admit that there's no way to accurately document it... But I personally don't believe people who make careers of lying.  If any Freemasons were killed at all, it was only those whom the Freemason / Jewish Nazis wanted to rid of their own society.  Hitler's objective was to transform himself by reforming his own people through acts of genocide / ethnic cleansing.  He also incidently eliminated many others whom he hated, in the process.  Hitler was filled with self-hatred, a mental case.  Notice that Hitler had very few Aryan physical features of his own, although his mother was supposedly Aryan or Teutonic.  However, ironically the entire Holocaust was based purely on physical attributes like eye and hair colors; and on skeletal, cranial, or bone structures.  They forced the population to stand in line for anthropological measurements and analyses, in order to achieve his goal of racial purification for Germany.  DNA analysis of another male family member proved that his father was a Jew, most likely Sephardic.  To this day Ashkenazi Jews continue to oppress Sephardi Jews, mainly because they don't 'like' their swarthy, dark looks.  If he could have had children, he might have transformed his offspring into acceptable Ashkenazis unlike himself, but he was impotent.  And some historians believe as I do, that he was a genetically damaged freak of nature:  a hermaphrodite.

(Furthermore, every powerful Freemason I've met have been Hitler-worshippers who subscribe to Eugenics, and who delusionally believe themselves superior to "Gentiles" based on physical attributes such as their Rh negative blood-types.  Also I've learned what I suspected all along, straight from the source, "The History of Freemasonry" c1898, Vol. II, that historically Freemasons (ie the elite, aristocratic Jews) have freely borrowed or appropriated Pagan, military, and other philosophies -- along with many of their wives, according to the Polish Ashkenazi rabbi, Chaim Potok -- from Teutonic society.  I'm sure that in antiquity they killed off most of the Teutonic men, in order to gain power over German lands.

(Finally, the same book freely admits that Freemasons -- at least the elite among them -- are all Jews.  So while not admitting the whole truth, they are actually proving that they killed their own people during the "Holocaust" -- a Jewish term, after all.  Hitler and many of his own military and governmental cabinet members were themselves Jews -- and most definitely also Freemasons.  His father or grandfather was reputedly a Rothschild, again pointing out the link to Freemasonry and the Illuminati.  For many centuries, the Jewish elite have denied any connection with Freemasonry -- but they were lying all along.

(On the surface, it seems positively ridiculous that Freemasons and other elite "Jews" would doggedly attempt to continue the "Holocaust" charade, that of being the victims of it and not the perpetrators; but when you examine the issue a bit closer, it's understandable that they don't wish the truth to become common knowledge:  their entire economy, political and social powers, and a tremendous number of lucrative jobs for Jews [including those involved in the Anti-Defamation League] -- are all hinged on their assumed roles, of playing the victims.  That is how they gain sympathy from tender-hearted true Christians.  However the reality is that they're not in fact victims, but perpetrators.

(Their "elite", the "Illuminati", have built an empire for themselves, using their own Jewish commoners for their very best trained slaves.  As with any mind cult, their followers are all strictly programmed automatons, right from the cradle to the grave.  They've also succeeded in ensnaring a great number of Christians with their Zionist zeal and false doctrines.  Playing blackmail upon the fact that the original Christians [not Roman Catholics, who are adherents to a false religion that developed later] -- and many remaining modern ones too -- were / are also Jews or more accurately -- Israelites,  they make persuasive appeals to real Christians' false sense of identity with a people who nevertheless are not really who they pretend to be:  modern Jews are mostly imposters, not true Israelites.  They are mostly descended from Turkish / Mongolian conversos [Khazars, who later took many Pagan Teutonic wives in Germany] to "Judaism" (the religion alone, technically not the blood inherited ethnicity) -- not Israelites by blood, as they would have everyone to believe.

(Furthermore, historically the practitioners of the false religions, Talmudic "Judaism" and "Qabalah" have always -- since the time of Jesus -- looked down upon and persecuted real Christians [in other words, their brother Israelis including Jesus, who were actually far more pious than themselves], as "heretics"...  Reminds me of the Jesuit / Roman Catholic [also "Episcopalian" or Church of England] intolerance for "heresy", of which Protestant Reformationists received by far the worst treatment.  Which isn't all that strange, since a great many Catholics and their families are descended from "Jewish" 'conversos', or converts.

(The imposter Jews, who were mostly of Pagan origins, have historically gotten along famously with not just Pagans and Catholics, but also with their cousins, the Muslim tribes.  Muslims too, were originally Pagans, and still worship a black meteor in Mecca enclosed in the Kabah ["cube", in Arabic].  The one trait which I find in all those groups:  Pagans, Catholics, Jews, and Muslims -- is their intolerance of "heresy" and their bloodthirsty fondness of pillage and plunder.  All of their elite especially, are extremely materialistic and power-hungry.

(Yet most ironic is the fact that despite the Illuminati's many covert wars against "heretics" (read: true Christians, as the Illuminat themselves are in the final analysis -- anti-Christ), they themselves hypocritically practice broadrange apostasy, integrating Paganism, Luciferianism, Satanism and Witchcraft or Alchemy with Judaic, Vedic, Muslim and Christian traditions (they've recently also added Buddhist philosophy to their pantheistic form of 'world religion').  They seem to have borrowed superstitions from every culture with which they've ever become involved.  And I believe they were motivated to do so, by a deep-seated and irrational, desperate hunger for power and control.  They have vainly attempted to compensate for their genetic and mental inferiority by means of rituals, ceremonies and imagery -- very much like stage magicians, with their smoke-and-mirrors sleight-of-hand tricks.  They also have an overwhelming need to assimilate with the general population of Human beings, passing themselves off as 'normal', while more or less secretly maintaining exclusivity.  Like chameleons, they blend in for the sake of survival, which they value far more than morality.

[NOTE: It's fairly obvious how gathering all the major, State approved and established religions under one very large umbrella serves the Illuminati in forming their own World Religion; after achieving unity, they have only to attain conformity and consensus amongst all of them, regarding certain key doctrines which are chosen and developed to aid them in maintaining world domination.  Playing on the idealistic, superstitious, insecure and zealous natures of many people (especially the uneducated, mentally deficient, damaged, brain-washed, and/or Hybrids -- which I might add, is the average person on the street these days), they easily initiate them into their various clubs and organizations which accept any and all devout church-goers, and Atheists to boot -- herding them like sheep.]

(In fact Ignatius de Loyola, founder of the Jesuits, is thought by many to have been one of them.
[The first three links were written by organizations who are biased in Loyola's favor.  None of them mention his Jewish ancestry or his involvement in the Qabalah.]
("The first Jesuits were crypto-Jews.  Ignatius Loyola himself was a crypto-Jew of the Occult Cabala.  A crypto-Jew is a Jew who converts to another religion and outwardly embraces the new religion, while secretly maintaining Jewish practices.  As John Torell explains:  'In 1491 San Ignacio de Loyola was born in the Basque province of Guipuzcoa, Spain.  His parents were Marranos and at the time of his birth the family was very wealthy.  As a young man he became a member of the Jewish Illuminati order in Spain.  As a cover for his crypto Jewish activities, he became very active as a Roman Catholic.  On May 20, 1521 Ignatius (as he was now called) was wounded in battle, and became a semi-cripple.  Unable to succeed in the military and political arena, he started a quest for holiness and eventually ended up in Paris where he studied for the priesthood.  In 1539 he had moved to Rome where he founded the 'JESUIT ORDER', which was to become the most vile, bloody and persecuting order in the Roman Catholic Church.  In 1540, the current Pope Paul III approved the order.  At Loyola's death in 1556 there were more than 1000 members in the Jesuit order, located in a number of nations.'

("Ignatius of Loyola's secretary, Polanco, was of Jewish descent and was the only person present at Loyola's deathbed {so, only he knew whether or not Catholic 'last rites' were administered to Loyola -- I gather probably not}.  James Lainez, who suceeded Loyola as the second Jesuit General, was also of Jewish descentJews were attracted to the Jesuit order and joined in large numbers.  Lacunza was no exception.  He was a Jew, which explains why he introduced the eschatological teaching of a return to the Jewish animal sacrifices during the Millennium.  [In a book titled The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty published in 1812, 11 years after the death of its author, Jesuit Emanuel de Lacunza who, wrote under the fictitious pen name of a purportedly converted Jew, Rabbi Juan Josaphat Ben Ezra, in order to conceal his identity and to make his writings more palatable to the Protestant readers.  He promoted the writings of sixteenth century Jesuit priest Francisco Ribera, developing a futuristic perspective which restricted the prophetic fulfillments in the book of Revelation to the end of the world].  Lacunza also wrote that during a millenium after the tribulation the Jewish animal sacrifices would be reinstated along with the Eucharist [the mass] of the Catholic Church {now there's a marriage made in hell...}.  Lacunza has followed after Jewish fables and replaced the commandments of God with the commandments of men.  That doctrine gives the Jews primacy in God's plan and relegates Christians to a prophetic parenthetical to be supplanted by the Jews during the thousand year earthly reign of Christ."
(Another biased history; the author admires the Jesuits for not being "anti-semitic" like Rome, but admits that they did in fact mercilessly persecute "witches" -- most of whom were women.  Yet although not "anti-semitic", Loyola protested when challenged, that he was not Jewish although he wished it were so... displaying conflicting attitudes, indicating deception.
(Defamation, a documentary film by Israeli Jewish journalist Yoav Shamir -- one of those rare Jews who value truth and reality.  In it he exposes the fraudulent activities of the Anti Defamation League; and reveals how Jewish children are programmed by the State to hate 'Gentiles' and to accept and play the role of victims.  His grandmother exclaims, when criticizing American Zionists, "No!  I'm a real Jew!"
(An interesting discussion about real and false Jews; and whether or not Loyola was himself a Jew... "As for Ignatius being a closet Jew 'Moranno' etc, I don't agree, all the [Catholic and Jewish authored] biographies online, speak of a noble Basque family, early priesthood--which back in those times could be age 13 even.  Anyhow whatever Loyola was, he was satanically involved:

("'Ignatius of Loyola {born in 1491 at the castle of Loyola above Azpeitia in Guipuscoa, Spain; died at Rome, 31 July 1556} is said to have not only risen several feet but become luminous in the process.'

("If we are going to look at the occult kabbalah, it's nothing but babylonianism with a jewish flavor... {meant to deceive}.  Just another branch of Mystery Babylon, which Talmudic Judaism also is of.  If you have read my other blog entries, Mystery Babylon always overlaps [sun worship, occult, etc, Satan has the same lies everywhere].

("A couple months ago, I encountered a couple kabbalists online, and one showed me his favorite website, all the rituals, and more could have been taken off any other occult and new age website, that includes EVERYTHING in Catholic mysticism.  It all has the same Babylonian roots."

(So, the writer points out the wide range of Luciferianism or Sorcery ["Mystery Babylon", "kabbalah", etc.]; and also sheds some light on why the matter of Loyola's ancestry is at all controversial... It's been asserted many times by Jews, that one may be Jewish either by blood inheritance OR by religion.  Perhaps in Loyola's case, as with many others, it's a matter only of his religious beliefs.)

[NOTE:  According to rabbi Chaim Potok, both Tomas de Torquemada (Queen Isabella's personal confessor), one of the Inquisition's most bloodthirsty and cruel henchmen -- and -- St. Teresa d'Avila, the founder of convents for Catholic nuns, were Jewish conversos to Catholicism (or, came from converso families -- many of which, according to Potok, practiced crypto-Judaism (ie secretly)... The Inquisition, according to Potok, executed thousands of secret Jews, secret Muslims, and Protestants who did not and would not, hide their faith.  Also according to Potok, during these times Spain's population held hundreds of thousands of converts from Judaism to Catholicism.  He explained that the Jews who converted were mostly wealthy merchants and others who desired to maintain their property and business interests in the region -- rather than be expelled or executed.]

Besides the Masons, several other related organizations were also advertized on the government sponsored billboard:

Toastmaster's International
Lion's Clubs International
Shriners' (also known as the "Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, established in 1870)
Jaycees (also known as Junior Chamber International)
Rotary International
Optimists International
Veteran's of Foreign Wars (Notice that only veteran's of foreign wars are allowed in this club, lol)

Also, notice that nearly every one of these American government sponsored clubs' titles contain the word:  "International"...

So, why does our local government support these "international" organizations, to the exclusion of others?  That's not only discrimination -- it's anti-American.  And why does our goverment support religion (Freemasonry)?  That's also illegal, un-Constitutional.

I'm sure that the benefits of membership in those clubs are not worth the sacrifices of Self involved, whether they be of the material, spiritual, or intellectual sorts.  The Hopi say (and I agree wholeheartedly) that when you lie, you lose your Self.  The flip side of the proverb states (in so many words) that in order to maintain 'friendships', you must be agreeable, cooperative.  If friends happen to be naturally compatible, that isn't problematic; but becomes so when one feels obligated to deceive in order to 'fit in' or to maintain the status quo.  Or, to survive and/or to prosper.

According to rabbi Chaim Potok, a covenant is a sovereignty oath or treaty between a Ruler (whether real or imagined) and his or her subjects or between an abstract entity like a State, Nation, or Church and its members or followers.  It is drawn up by the dominant power or its representative(s) alone, and presented to captives, 'employees', servants or slaves with the choice to either take it or leave it.  A covenant or oath consists of a preamble (which reminds initiates or serfs of the history surrounding the agreement), a list of demands or expectations (similar to an ordinary employment contract -- except that you pay them and not the other way around), promises of specific benefits or protections if and when you keep your side of the bargain, and most importantly perhaps: a list of punishments or disciplines which might be utilized against subjects who fail to meet the demands placed on them by their rulers (usually involving the possibility of quite severe measures, including the death penalty).  Usually after the agreement is signed and oaths are sworn by initiates, such contracts are metaphorically sealed by some kind of symbolic ritual with religious overtones combining theatrical or dramatic types of actions, along with scripted words or speech and finally a celebration like cocktails, banquets, parties or orgies.  It's as if magic is thrown into the bargain, in order to strengthen the bonds between ruler and serf.  But what seems like magic, is in reality nothing more than mental programming.

In ancient times among the mostly Pagan peoples of the world (including many Israelites), tribes often attacked one another for material gain.  They'd hunted out most of the game already, and destroyed their soils with grazing cattle, sheep, goats, camels, and other domestic animals; and they fornicated so much, with multiple wives or concubines, that they had far too many children to feed.  So, they simply stole it from their neighbors every chance they got.  Whenever a tribe got so powerful that they created empires and armies, they would often blackmail their war captives into signing sovereignty treaties which were in essence a form of "voluntary" bondage or slavery.  The losers of wars were sometimes given the choice whether to be executed or to agree to live a life of serfdom, paying heavy taxes and tributes to the ruling kingdom.

This is how habits of war, plunder, totalitarianism, despotism, tyranny, materialism, greed, slavery, militarism and so forth, became enmeshed into the laws of ancient civilizations.  From the beginning, kings and other tribal leaders usually had the authority to dictate the common citizens' religions, including their rituals and other practices.  They desired complete control, so they forced people to live according to the demands of their leaders.  The easiest way to establish such complete control, was to appeal to the fears and superstitions of the people who depended on government for their protection, safety, and welfare.  'Commoners' were obliged to depend on their governments or rulers, because if they didn't swear loyalty to them, they would suffer the consequences:  death at the hands of military mercenaries or henchmen.  So that is how and why from very early times, governing powers nearly always instituted official State religions.
(The Essenes renounced slavery -- good for them; that increases my admiration for them.)

As I pointed out at the start of this essay, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights which was drawn up for the protection of the freedom of Individual citizens.  Article One of that legal document, guarantees each citizen the Right to Believe as they desire.  That means we have the right to follow our own religion, since the word religion means a "system of beliefs".  As long as we don't impinge on any other persons' Civil Rights, we may do so.  Furthermore, that Article states that American Government has no right to "establish" religion.  Yet, that is exactly what Congress has done repeatedly, almost from the very beginning.  However, most people believe the propaganda we hear in schools and elsewhere, which denies that our Right to our own belief systems has been violated.

Many (perhaps most) people continue to believe the lies, in spite of the overwhelming evidence which is right in front of them.  Repeatedly Congress has exempted certain churches, synagogues and mosques from paying income taxes.  That, according to American historian Charles A. Beard, myself, and some few others, is the same thing as establishment of State religions.  Only religions approved by Congress get such favoritism.  Citizens don't get treated so well as do churches and other corporations -- citizens must pay taxes.  Why do some rigidly organized religions receive preferential treatment over the Rights of individual citizens?  It should never happen, because it's un-Constitutional.

Our country now has far more finely constructed and costly houses of "worship" or "temples" than it needs.  Most of them stand half-empty on their "Holy" days.  Most of their pastors and other religious leaders preach more about politics, than about morals.  When they do talk about morals, it's usually with the intention of causing guilt in the minds of the congregation.  They use the natural Human traits of conscience and responsibility combined with guilt (via implied accusations of failure or wrongdoing among the congregation), to play on the need for approval and acceptance by their "superiors" or by the "authorities".  It's a form of emotional, mental blackmail.  Yet no matter how hard they strive to measure up, it never seems to be enough.  No matter how much money is dropped into the tithe basket, the preacher continues to push for more.  How much of that tax-free income, is ever really used to help the poor?  Very little of it, or there would be no poor in the United States; none at all.

A 'religion' is simply a belief system, and in America according to Article One of the US Constitution, Bill of Rights -- Individuals are guaranteed the Civil Right of Freedom to Believe as we wish.  Yet in practice, what we sadly endure is a covert, secret-society State Religion:  "Freemasonry".  Masons are recruited from amongst all the established religions (although their elite members are mostly Jewish, either by family descent or by religion); and Freemasonry itself is a religious cult, deceptively representing itself as a fraternity or brotherhood of 'exceptional' men.  Men of intelligence, money, moral character, skills and/or talents, are lured into the A.F. & A.M. 'club' with promises of support from the organization.  In return, they must work voluntarily for the organization; and they must pay "dues".  They also must pass initiations and take oaths for which the ultimate consequence of failure is death.

Initiates swear oaths of loyalty to one another and to the organization.  Furthermore, they promise to accept death as the punishment for disobedience.  Nearly every top official in our government is a Freemason; and if not, you can bet that they won't stay in politics for very long -- they will soon leave office one way or another:  either voluntarily or otherwise.  More than a few politicians and other government paid or funded officials have died under very suspicious circumstances; but investigations into them always turn up nothing of any value -- no prosecutions or convictions.  Name one Coroner, Judge or top Law Enforcement official, who is not a Mason.

Because, the "Freemasons" (just one of their legions of names) has historically made for themselves a determined goal of infiltrating and controlling all governments (especially those of the most powerful nations)...  And when only some, Congressionally approved, types of religion or societal elements or groups are represented by a government based on 'democracy' (like ours is supposed to be), then what you have is gross discrimination against Individuals -- and that's not the American Way.  Discrimination is anti-democratic; a violation of individual Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

That is not what most Americans have bargained for, expected, or been promised by our leadership.  What we were promised, again and again, was freedom and equal opportunity:  "Land of the Free, home of the Brave, etc.".  Individual Freedom and Justice are the whole damn point of the Bill of Rights, and of the Declaration of Independence -- supposedly and ideally.

But our university educated American lawyers, of which Congress is mostly comprised, along with greedy corporate magnates, have severe problems of comprehension which preclude their proper understanding and interpretation of the American English language in which the Constitution was written.  They're criminally incompetent; even I can do better than that.  Problem is, they deliberately pervert justice.

The orchestrated, intentional, covert, secretive, passive-aggressive domination of our government and thence of our People by members of Freemasonry (or any "lobby" or organization -- religious, corporate, criminal, or otherwise), is little other than a form of involuntary servitude foisted upon us without our informed consent.  Our Civil Rights are being violated, and our "social contract" has already been broken, shattered -- by our government, who are guilty of 'breach of contract'...  It's a deal-breaker.

In effect, our government has covertly declared and waged a civil war and commits treason against American citizens, especially against all non-Masons (including practically all women, who are excluded from joining).

I noticed early on, that things aren't going very well in America these days (that is unless you are 'one of them', ie you either join or at least tolerate the infusion of our government with their cultish, Pagan-influenced religion and/or join one of the State established, Congressionally supported and approved churches, synagogues, mosques or fraternities).  Bottom line, you must cooperate with and not annoy them, ie keep your thoughts and opinions to yourself and don't practice your Rights to Free Speech or Assembly (unless for the purpose of praising them, of course) -- if you wish to physically and economically survive and avoid becoming the target of persecution, injustice or harassment.

And you certainly had better not question or argue with any one of them (the "insiders", also known as the "elite").  Obviously, a great deal of discrimination is being targetted toward and against Individuals in America.  Unless you "belong" to some powerful group or another (one which meets the 'approval' of Freemasons), you'll frequently encounter dismissive or condescending attitudes, all types of abuses (official or otherwise), negligence, and disrespectful expressions of disgust or ridicule from practically anyone at any level of power in government or corporations.  Discrimination is not only wrong and inhumane, it's counter to democratic ideals, it's un-Constitutional.  It's the manner of monarchs and fascists, tyrants and despots.  The United States government was never intended to be expressed in the form of a dictatorship, monarchy, feudal system or anything other than a true democracy.

And you can't have a true and proper American democracy with a Congress that does not uphold our Constitution, our Bill of Rights.  Those Rights protect Individuals against abuses by majority rule -- abuses by government, organizations and corporations.  That is the most important, of all the "checks and balances" which guide and order our system of government.

Also in in violation of our Civil Rights, the American government, bureaucracy and corporations control the entire 'economy', with all of its resources -- including the citizenry, which they classify and treat not as Individuals, but as commodities, chattel.  More remnants of the lingering feudal system of old, with all of its classism and heraldric symbolism.  Now as then, the biggest industries the self-made "aristocrats" are capable of producing, are war and forced servitude.

And if you are a woman, you don't stand much of a chance in American life unless you hook up (usually with a legalistic marital contract) with a powerful man.  In other words, with one of them (insiders or elites), the socially or economically "connected".  Either that, or you can do what I did:  work twice as hard for half as much reward...  Women are still (despite repeated legislative gestures extending tokens of equality) generally treated like chattel or slaves in our society, as much by men as by government.  Only the wealthiest heiresses or the most sexually attractive (usually for them, very young) women are ever given much respect by the men of America, especially the men in government or corporations.  And what little respect we do gain or earn is always conditional upon our performance, behavior, and appearance.  Women are expected by the establishment, to be both obedient and alluring.  Many women who realize they can't fight it -- join them (usually in marriage or some other forms of phallus worship or other types of servitude) and adopt the same self-loathing, misogynistic hatred toward all women (especially the poor or disenfranchised).  They look down their proud noses upon their less fortunate sisters.

Then again, some people (of any gender) without the advantages of wealth or other personal and marketable assets choose rather to engage in lives of crime, becoming hustlers or con-artists of some sort.  (Notice how many prostitutes and pimps are found in our country?  It's appalling that even children are too commonly being sold for sex, here).  If we actually possessed real "equal opportunity" and "liberty", there would be very little need for crime in the first place:  there would be no 'needy' Americans.  Most Americans are barely surviving (especially certain 'minorities', the sick, fatherless, orphaned, women, children, and some elderly), or have been duped into believing they must attain lavish standards of living in order to secure any substantial social status at all.  We've been conditioned to believe that only high status and popular citizens have the Right to Pursue Happiness, to live comfortably.  But our Constitution states otherwise:  all US citizens in fact have that Right, by Law.  We've been unlawfully and criminally, economically enslaved and debased, by our 'representatives':  Congress.

And any men who don't obediently meet their (the status quo, the 'authorities', the 'elite, 'insiders', also known as the "hive" or "matrix") standards of conformity are treated the same as women and children:  like worthless non-entities.  Children too, are nothing more to them (the 'powers that be') than potential playthings or future slaves, likewise for the purpose of exploitation.  And if Freemasons (of whatever flavor or hue, although you can bet they all have money connections to either government or corporations) protest otherwise (and assuredly they will do so):  I certainly don't believe them... they lie too much, to ever be taken seriously by anyone (even their own kind).

In Revelation 3:9, Jesus said (according to the holy prophet John of Patmos), "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."

Now, I'd already caught on to the fact that most modern Jews are not necessarily real Jews.  In fact, most of them are Turks, Arabs, Mongols, North African, Khazars, mixed Indo-European, Aryan, or Eurasian types of lineages, who converted to the religion of "Judaism".  They're found throughout the Old World, even in places like China, Japan, Viet Nam, Thailand, Iran, and Africa.  And they've of course now colonized most of the New World as well.  They are a matrilineal Patriarchy, whose men very often married foreign women in ancient times.  They also often engaged in polygamy (breaking the commandment: "thou shall not commit adultery").  Yet they insistently claim to be "Jews" by blood, and that's technically incorrect (in fact they are "Jews" mostly by tradition and custom, but not so much by actually authentic genetic heredity).  A true "Jew" is an Israelite descended from Jacob's son, Judah.
(Koestler was a Jew, and was persecuted by his own people for seeking and telling the truth.  A 'real Jew' must be an Israelite, by definition -- genetically, not just politically.  That's how their own scripture defines it, in the Torah.  According to the Bible, a "Jew" is supposed to be someone descended genetically from Jacob's son, Judah.  Modern "Jews" themselves, spend a great deal of their time and resources 'proving' their bona fide Jewish identity with pedigrees and DNA testing... Presently, they're even trying to redefine the "scientific" classification, "Jew", just as they've done to Native Americans.  In both cases, they're trying to pass off what are really ethnic groups, as very specific races.  The purpose in doing so, is to exclude a lot of people from claiming either heritage.  Evidently, Jews and some Native American tribal leaders recognize some monetary and material benefits in "belonging" to those special interest groups.  Many or most people who now identify themselves as elite "insiders" to those two groups especially -- are not even remotely descended from those original people, tribes or clans.  They're imposters.)
(This one is very thoroughly researched, with citations.)

I also thought it strange that "Jews" only recognize three (Judah, Benjamin and the priestly tribe of Levites) of the original twelve (really thirteen, counting the Levites) tribes of Israel; that they dismiss and regard the other ten tribes as being "lost" somehow, inexplicably.  However that doesn't make sense, because the "Jews" were also dispersed throughout the world and sometimes enslaved by or integrated into other nations -- so why wouldn't they also be "lost"?  It's yet another hypocrisy.  The answer is that to the modern Jews, their blood or genetic purity is almost (but not quite) as important as their traditions -- which they simply keep mostly 'in the family'.

Says Chaim Potok:  "[Sometime following 134 BC, near the demise of the Hellenistic Greek Seleucid empire]... In Judea, John Hyrcanus son of Simon was high priest and king... He conquered most of Palestine and took Idumea in the south.  He forced the entire pagan population of Idumea to convert to Judaism, the first such mass conversion in history."

So historically since the earliest times, the monotheistic Jews (and Israelites too, sometimes -- but always remember, according to rabbi Chaim Potok their kingdom was divided almost from the start, with each of the two groups of tribes traveling similar yet very different paths on their journeys through destiny) were quite often led astray by foreign, Pagan practices; and in turn they (the Jews at least) sometimes forced many Pagans to practice Judaism.

At some point during the Roman empire however, the shoe was on the other foot, the table turned:  Judah was conquered by the Roman Pagans.  During that time of their serfdom to Rome, the Jews shunned as "heretics" with harsh social and economic ostracism the earliest Christians, who were themselves originally mostly Israelites and Jews; then nevertheless a few centuries later, many thousands of Talmudic "Jews" (not necessarily Israelites), unlike most Reformationist Protestants in the same circumstances, allowed themselves to be converted into the Roman Catholic church, in order to side-step the Inquisitions and to protect their lucrative business interests.

Also during the earlier decades of Roman occupation, the aristocratic leaders of Judea conformed to Rome's wishes as much as possible, paying tribute and marrying into Roman families in order to make political connections (the Herod dynasty was only half Jewish, and half Roman).  They did so, in order to make the best of a bad situation, as usual.  Historically, aristocratic Jews have often been willing to compromise their religion and morals, for material gain.  Most of the more pious Jews, on the other hand, have been people of lesser privilege and circumstance.

During this same period, the Jewish Pharisees (sages or teachers, who were very involved in politics) enjoyed a great deal of local power.  It was only when their power base became threatened by further pressures from Rome (for one thing, Caligula intended to set up a golden statue depicting himself as Zeus, in the Holy of Holies within the temple sanctuary in Jerusalem -- something which would greatly upset the more pious Jews), that the people of Judea (of which there were then as now, several different factions) began to rise up in revolt.  Their rebellion ended with Judean civilization, already weakened, finally crushed to dust.  The second temple in Jerusalem was burned to the ground, and all of their sacrificial altars were torn down.  It was then that the seat of Judaic power transferred itself to Persian Babylon, where a very large and powerful Jewish population had already established itself.  Many Jewish aristocrats and Pharisees from Judea were allowed to relocate after the war.

This symbol of what appears to be a Phoenix, is on an old building in our local downtown, on Main street.  It originally decorated "Main Street Pharmacy", now out of business, although no one ever saw fit to paint over it.  I suppose the Chamber of Commerce sees it as some sort of universal symbol, appropriate for practically any merchant.

UPDATE:  This same exact design is found on the national flag of Poland, lol.  Except, theirs wears a golden crown on its head.

Furthermore I've often wondered, why did the twelve tribes of Israel get renamed and rearranged in scriptural texts, so that for example the tribe of Dan no longer seems to exist?  What is the purpose for that?  The tribe of Dan has been wrongly demonized, because they were no more sinful than any other tribes, including those of the Jews.  It's as if they are hoping the people of Dan will simply disappear.  Yet the original ancient scriptural texts state that Dan is a tribe of Israel, and that Jesus / God loves all the tribes of Israel.  It promises that God will gather his People from among all nations, tribes, and kindreds (or lineages).  But the Jewish Illuminati seek to exclude ten of the twelve tribes of Israel -- especially Dan, apparently -- from any recognition of being Human beings made in God's 'image'.  Makes me wonder, why?

The tribe of Dan has been falsely associated with the "serpent seed" or "serpent worshippers", based on a perverse and deliberately misleading interpretation of the biblical text wherein Dan receives the blessing of his father, Israel:  Genesis 49:16-17, "Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel.  Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward."  They twisted a common expression around to make it sound like it means something else, and that's wrong.  "A serpent by the way, an adder in the path" does not hold the same meaning as "serpent worshippers".  Dan was militarily the second most powerful tribe in ancient Israel (besides Judah), and I believe that Judah attempted by committee to rid itself of competition with Dan for the same reasons that they sold Joseph into Egyptian slavery -- in order to dominate the inheritance (especially the land).

Usually the excuse given for rejecting, hating the tribe of Dan, is that they practiced Paganism at some point.  But that's hypocrisy, because all of Israel and Judah practiced Paganism at various times throughout history.  And the Jews (like the Catholics) have (secretly) even gone so far as to integrate Paganism with Monotheism in such a way as to form a Pantheism.

But then, modern "Jews" also claim to be descended from David and Solomon (thus implying that they have some divine right to rule over all "Gentiles") -- and that too, is a lie.  You can't be descended from the tribe of Judah (Jesus' father, Joseph's ancestry, by the way) -- if you are in reality the sons of Khazars, Mongols or Tubal Cain.  You can't have it both ways:  adopting a religion (such as Judaism) does not magically transform your DNA to conform with that religion's founders.  I've got news for you:  the original Israelites (including Judah, Levi and Benjamin) were not Indo-Europeans... lol.  They were not Aryan descendants of Neanderthals, but full-blooded Human beings -- made in God's image.

However, rabbi Chaim Potok seems to try to mitigate the glaring similarities, both genetic and cultural, between modern Jews and Arabs; and / or between Jews and 'Gentiles'; beginning with the admission that Judaism welcomed anyone, Hebrew or not, to become a Pharisee:  "The finest minds of the land were attracted to these Pharisee masters, the sages.  Anyone with a gift of will and mind -- rich man, poor man, convert -- could rise to the status of a sage.  As masters and disciples met and studied together, they would talk of festivals, ritual purity, marital relations, civil and criminal law, behavior toward the poor, treatment of children and parents, responsibilities of government authorities -- every aspect of the people's life came under the sacred canopy of the law.  The oral law was not a secret doctrine but one the sages wished to make known to all the people."  By characterizing the common, oral Jewish law as being "not a secret doctrine", Potok implies that they also had a "secret doctrine", besides.  He also indicates that the Pharisees (sages, or teachers) were recruited from among their students.

According to Potok, Arabs shared the Jewish and Pagan penchant for performing military attacks on innocent villages for material gain:  "Hunger made brigandage an institution of Bedouin culture; hence the razzia, the lightning raid upon a neighboring tribe or village, whose purpose was plunder with a minimal shedding of blood.  Christian tribes of the Arabian desert [not those Christians who lived elsewhere] also practiced it with no hesitation.  A poet who lived during the early period of Islamic conquest writes:  'Our business is to make raids on the enemy, on our neighbor and on our brother, in case we find none to raid but a brother.'"  Potok refers to the time before Islam, when "there was much single combat, plundering, and raiding...", along with "border disputes" and "petty insults" -- the Arabs' "heroic age".

I really doubt that the earlier Christian tribes, even those living in the Arabian desert, would ever have raided their own "brothers" -- as did the Jews and Muslims.  They probably struck back at Muslims and Jews who had first attacked them.

Potok relates that one day around the seventh century AD, the Islamic prophet, Mohammed (not his original name), chose to embrace monotheism like the earlier Christians and some Jews.  Maybe a decisive factor was having a wealthy wife whose cousin was a Christian.  Nevertheless, Mohammed (unlike the earliest Israelite and Christian monotheists) used force to promote himself as ruler and his religion as State law, after efforts to persuade with less violent methods failed... "The Jewish tribes [then residing in the Arabian desert] attacked by Mohammed had joined his enemies in actively propagandizing against Islam.  Jews who had remained neutral were not driven out of Medina."  So, some Jews were from ancient history, propagandists; and some were morally neutral.

Potok describes how Mohammed solidified his power base through bloody battles, which he fought with vicious vigor.  The five Pillars of Islam, the Pax Islamica, are:  1- The statement of belief in the unity and uniqueness of God and that Mohammed is the [one and only] prophet of God; 2- personal and communal prayer directed toward Mecca [which, I understand is supposed to happen at least five times daily]; 3- pilgrimage to the sacred house of Islam in Mecca -- the Kabah [a cube shaped structure containing the black meteorite, an Arab Pagan fetish] -- at least once during one's life; 4- observance of certain periods of fasting [Talmudic Jews also fast a lot]; 5- the payment of a contribution, which later became a tax [ie mandatory, like tribute to kings and nobility], to the community or state.

Originally, Mohammed had his followers direct their ritualistic prayers toward Jerusalem, but after the Jews angered him, they now pray to this ancient Pagan shrine in Mecca, containing a black meteorite stone.

So by that time [632 AD], all three of the loosely related and theoretically monotheistic religions, Talmudic Judaism, Christianity [by decree of Rome's converted Pagan emperor, Constantine], and Islam, were state religions.  There was very little distinction between civil and ecclesiastical laws.  State religion itself, as an institution, seems to have arisen like the Phoenix from the ashen customs of Pagan civilizations, which would never separate the two.  State religion is a method of keeping the general population under control, enslaved in a type of mental or psychic bondage.  It allows government the opportunity to play upon the spiritual fears and superstitions of citizens.  In feudal Europe, the Catholic church functioned as the state religion of monarchs.  When Henry VIII later created the Church of England in defiance of Rome, he hadn't done so for the goal of separating church and state:  for he placed himself, a monarch, at the head of England's official church, instead of the Pope.

It is quite apparent that religious wars like the Crusades and those which formed the Islamic and Hebrew empires, Inquisitions like those waged against heresies toward the Roman Catholic church, and progroms (a Russian word, meaning, "to wreak havoc, to demolish violently") like the "Holocaust" (Greek for "burnt whole"; usually used in the context of making sacrifices to pagan idols), are phenomena which directly result from the union of Church (or, a very rigidly dogmatic system of belief) and State (or, any secular, civil government) -- whether the religion is of the "secret society" or the common, publicly practiced types.  Both are convenient for sustaining power over specific populations:  openly acknowledged State religions are useful when States wish to draft ordinary citizens into militaries in order to fight wars against "foreigners"; while "secret societies" are frequently utilized by the elite and government against the citizenry, for the purpose of making covert 'civil' wars.
(Here, Wikipedia rightly points out the connection between the Knights Templar, the Crusades, the Catholic church and Freemasonry.  The Crusaders took Jerusalem from the Muslims, and Jews claim that many Jews were massacred along with the Arabs.  Yet the Knights Templar didn't destroy the Dome of the Rock mosque, which sits on Solomon's temple mount.)

I notice that our government heads also sometimes choose to use religion in order to manipulate the emotions and opinions of US citizens:

When I read online a few years ago, that the "Illuminati" consider themselves to be some sort of exotic hybrid species, not fully Human -- that raised some suspicions on my part.  They claimed to be bred with fallen angels, etc., though I'm rational enough to know that is impossible.  But what is possible (yet just as terrifying) is that they are in fact hybrid Human sub-species:  descendants of the Neanderthals.  So, if Neanderthals really were the romanticized version of "pre-Humans" that the mainstream media and government-funded scientists baselessly infer:  then, why did they work so hard to cover up their origins?  Why make up stories about Annunaki, Nephalim, etc.?  It can only have been for the purpose of presenting and maintaining an image of superiority over non-Neanderthals.  After all, they discovered that they were the offspring of Neanderthals through DNA -- long after the bones of the creatures had already been displayed in museums for many decades.  And in those days, scientists didn't try to sugar-coat the truth:  that Neanderthals were a hell of a lot dumber and much more aggressive (even vicious) than Homo Sapiens sapiens.  It must be ego-deflating, to suddenly realize your lineage is not a superior one after all, but is in fact an inferior one by Human standards.

With more recent knowledge about Neanderthals gained through DNA evidence, bringing to their attention that they are themselves descended from those creatures, they quickly altered their previous propaganda and began to romanticize not only the Neanderthals themselves, but all hybrids (trans-species, they call them).  They organized whole new popular cults surrounding bestiality and similar practices (like the 'Furries', 'Trans-humanism' etc.) -- to make it seem acceptable to mainstream society.  But it isn't acceptable; the holy scriptures (even in the 'real Jewish', or Hebrew, Old Testament) strictly forbids bestiality on pain of death... Exodus 22:19 -- "Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death."

I believe that these sub-Human, Human-like creatures with recessive ape genes (many with Rh- bloodtypes and bright blue or green eyes, red or straight blond hair, and other typically Aryan traits), these Freemasons, these pseudo-Jews -- are in fact the "Beast" symbolically spoken of in prophetic holy scriptures of the Bible.  They have taken the number symbolic of "Mankind" (666) for themselves, not because they are themselves Human, but in order to deceive us into believing that they are so.  (I've written at great length in others of my blogs about specifically how and why the Neanderthals came into existence, so I won't go over it again here, since this essay is on a slightly different, although related, topic).
(Science dances all around the truth of the matter; they are warm, but they keep missing the bullseye.)
(Neanderthal Genomics and the Evolution of Modern Humans.)

Nevertheless, Neanderthal Hybrids created Freemasonry; and Freemasons control our government.  That's why our government identifies itself with the symbolic number, 666 (XES in Greek figures; meaning, "Humanity" or "Mankind") -- in order to deceive us into believing that they are fully Human, when the truth is that they are not so.

Symbolizing the "Beast" of scriptural prophecies, "The Game that pits you against the most terrifying monster of all time."  This Ideal Toy Co. game, "King Kong", published in 1976 (just three years after opening day for the Twin Towers), and based on the movie of the same name produced by Dino De Laurentis (who also produced extraordinarily gruesome, horrifying and violent movies like the Hannibal Lector, cannibalistic serial killer series and "Serpico", ghoulishly foreshadowed the tragic event of September 11, 2001, almost exactly 25 years later.  To our government elite, the whole drama was nothing more than a game.  King Kong is described as a sort of exotic god-king, who makes the 'mistake' of falling in love with a beautiful woman -- instead of killing her.  That uncharacteristically Human behavior ironically results in an ill-begotten, dramatic emotional meltdown occurring at perhaps the biggest and most popular of tourist attractions, the World Trade Center...  Curious is the inscription on the side of the box, listing its contents (especially the choice of wording and the use of capitalization):  "Giant Gameboard, Tracks, Plastic Parts, Playing Pieces, King Kong figure, Spinner, Cards, and die." 

The game-board alone presents chilling imagery, a realistic representation of the mind-numbing destruction and chaos at the scene on that infamous day.  Whoever thought that such a scenario would make for a 'fun game', was nuts.  "The story of King Kong... Deep in the jungles of Micronesia, lived Kong... the world's most terrifying monster.  He reigned as a King until the day a beautiful young woman was offered to him in sacrifice.  Instead of killing her, Kong fell in love, and this led to his downfall.  Soon after, he was captured and taken to New York's Shea Stadium for thrill seekers to see.  But Kong's anger raged and, with his love, he fled through the streets of New York to the World Trade Center, the city's tallest buildings.  Now, the game begins!"

In order to search deeper into the origins and motives of the Illuminati / Freemasons, I read volume II (the only one available to me) of "The History of Freemasonry" (c1885), by insiders of the 'Craft':  Robert Freke Gould (Senior Grand Deacon of England), W. J. Hughan (Senior Grand Deacon and Historian), Rev. A. F. A. Woodford (Chaplain, Historian, England), David Murray Lyon (Secretary and Historian, Scotland), Enoch T. Carson (Deputy Northern Supreme Council 33 deg, Ohio, Grand Com..K...T, Ohio), Josiah H. Drummond (P...G...M, Maine and P...G...Com, Northern Supreme Council, U.S.A.), T. S. Parvin (P...G...M, Iowa and Grand Recorder, G...E...K...T, U.S.A.).  Three things I notice about this book:  it was written by men knowledgeable about Freemasonry; by men who take their religion very seriously...  and it is most definitely about their own religion (ie in this case, their very rigid and ritualistic systems of beliefs).

I learned from this book, that Masonry as a religion (not simply a craft, but a "Craft") originated in Egypt among enslaved Hebrew builders of the pyramids for the Pharoahs.  Also from this book and from Chaim Potok's "Wanderings", I learned that although Judaism is supposedly a monotheistic religion -- historically Jews have time and again relapsed back into Paganism... and that some very superficially "monotheistic" religions are indelibly infused with Pagan traditions.  Certain hedonistic pleasures are difficult to give up, for some people.  And Hybrids especially, seem particularly suggestible and fond of imitation.

See, Adam and Eve (who were the people made in God's 'image', or true Human beings) worshipped one God (the Creator, the Almighty -- many different names for the same Entity), in the Beginning.  Then after their fall from grace and eviction from the Garden of Eden (also known as Paradise), sin took root among their offspring, with some engaging in abominations (evil practices) like bestiality and strange, superstitious beliefs (ie Human sacrifices, etc., most of which are too disgusting to discuss openly).  And there arose among the various tribes, 'serpent worshippers' (Phallus and Fertility cultists), the 'serpent seed'.  These were Agriculturalists practicing animal husbandry (not like earlier Neolithic Hunter-gatherers, who were often exceptionally good at growing crops -- but nevertheless declined to enslave either animals or one another in ancient times), who eventually learned how to cross-breed Human slaves with Rhesus monkeys and / or other apes.

1Kings 10:22, "For the king had at sea a navy of Tharshish [Tarshish] with the navy of Hiram: once in three years came the navy of Tharshish, bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks."

The above verse is in reference to king Solomon of Judah.

Ancient Vedic temple frieze in India

India's "monkey army", a slave corps

The Vedics were Pagans who worshipped and made idols of serpents, among other things.

A representation of the Vedic monkey god, Hanuman

Rhesus monkeys on the palatial gate in Delhi

They also worshipped cattle, and bred hybrids like this Brahma bull.

Peacock mosaic at the City Palace in Jaipur... Peacocks are a common Aryan symbol.
(The Cult of the Peacock Angel)

By the way, in 1943 Jonger referred to the 19th century as the one of reason, and to the 20th century as the one of cults.  He also remarked that was why liberal sociologists were unable to recognize the issues regarding Hitler and the Nazis.

It's documented that the Nazis had certain special interests:  one of them was witchcraft (which they admired, while characterizing "witches" as victims of persecution -- the truth is that the victims of Catholic persecution during the Inquisitions were not real witches at all, as the Nazis believed, but were instead mostly just ordinary, innocent women), and another of their special interests of study was freemasonry (itself a cultish religion relying heavily on sorcery).

Persian Empire... As you can see, it stretched from the Levant and Egypt clear over to Northern India and Pakistan.

"Serpent Worshippers" or the "Serpent Seed" are Phallus worshippers, or Sex worshippers.  Orgies, breeding, sowing, reaping -- they were and are (like Darwinists, Nazis and Eugenicists) neurotically obsessed with the entire processes of reproduction, so much so, that they invented many elaborate and rigidly strict rituals around them.

Then these particular types of very sedentary (ie urbanized or cosmopolitanized) agriculturalists decided at some point in antiquity to breed an army of slaves to do their work for them, so that they'd have more time for "fun", "entertaining" things (like, Human sacrifices and orgies, etc.).  It would give them more time to conquer, steal, and make grand plans and schemes.  More time to design temples, fortresses and palaces that their slaves could build for them.  And they accomplished their goals partly through bestial breeding practices, or cross-species breeding (ie Human x Apes).  Otherwise they took captives through war and plundering, which is how the Israelites eventually ended up becoming enslaved in Egypt and in other empires such as Assyria, etc..

Slavery is a key component of this whole puzzle, as are other common sins like greed, idolatry, sloth, gluttony, superstition, and materialism... a lot of foolishness.  The root of the word, "sin", means to "miss the mark", or to "err".  Sin is the opposite of "wisdom".  In many respects, kings David and Solomon weren't really all that "wise".

The 'Star of David', a mystical symbol of the Qabbalah.

King Solomon seals, used as amulets.
"Jewish Gifts from Israel", lots of Kabbalah / Pagan gear.

The first Israelite known to have become enslaved by the Egyptians, was Joseph, one of Israel's twelve sons, his favorite in fact.  Sadly, due to the problems inherent in the customs of primogeniture, an ingrained custom of Patriarchal societies, many first-born sons and favorite sons or daughters often fell victim to the jealousies and greed of other family members including siblings and even mothers.  It's something that unfortunately continues to occur, even into modern times:  fraternicide.  Except that rather than kill him outright, they got rid of Joseph in such a fashion which they felt they could more easily bear on their consciences -- they sold him to the Egyptians.  Later, a large portion of Israel's tribes and clans emigrated from the Levant region to Egypt in order to escape famine conditions on their own homelands.  Years or decades afterwards, they and their descendants eventually became enslaved themselves.  Not all of Israel became Egyptian slaves, however:  a remnant of them had declined to leave their homelands, choosing instead to take their chances with famine.

But even before Moses led his people out of Egypt on the famous Exodus, before the Israelites ever became enslaved by the Pharoahs -- many of them had already allowed themselves to become influenced by Paganism.  After Adam and before Abraham, they were Pagans; and all throughout their history, time and again, they habitually embraced Pagan practices, falling away from monotheism.  At times, they even worshipped Pagan gods in Solomon's temple and made blood sacrifices to strange gods on their local altars as well.  Some went so far as to do what Abraham nearly did:  they sacrificed their own children to Molech.

The ancient Israelites learned Pagan ways from most of the many surrounding empires, besides Egypt:  Phoenicia, Assyria, Persia, India, Greece, Rome.  There must have been some sort of irrational allure or attraction to those religions.  Perhaps the sheer hedonism of the Pagans drew them in -- the excitement and grandeur of their colorful rituals, ceremonies, traditions and customs.  It was entertaining.  Because in monotheistic Israel, people were expected to live as plainly and modestly as did the Puritans or Quakers and other pious types of Christians.  No images, ornamentation, tattoos, piercing, jewelry, fancy clothes or houses -- no gold-plated bathroom fixtures.  Not only was the monotheistic fashion "boring" to some people of a particularly low IQ level -- there wasn't much opportunity to profit from it either, as there is so very little mercantilism involved in pious lifestyles.
"... an economic system developing during the decay of feudalism to unify and increase the power and especially the monetary wealth of a nation by a strict governmental regulation of the entire national economy usually through policies designed to secure an accumulation of bullion, a favorable balance of trade, the development of agriculture and manufactures, and the establishment of foreign trading monopolies..."

But the Pagans on the other hand:  they had thousands of different gods to choose from, to which they manufactured and built temples, altars, images, amulets, made offerings, threw parties, orgies, held ceremonies, parades, rituals, and so on.  Even Greek theater and the Olympic Games were originally intended as ceremonial rituals for their gods; they later became popular for their entertainment value alone, and thence became ever more commercialized.

The entire theme of Chaim Potok's "Wanderings -- History of the Jews", is built around the subject of Paganism.  Book One:  Through Ancient Paganism; Book Two: Through Classical Paganism; Book Three: Through Islam and Christianity; Book Four: Inside Modern Paganism.  Potok characterizes "modern Paganism" with one word:  "secularism".

Ironic is the fact that although all of the three major "monotheistic" religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, arose as reactions against Paganism -- all three have relapsed back again into Pagan beliefs and practices, to some extent.  In some cases, they were never fully emancipated from it; and in all of them, various sects have regularly evolved which have made repeated attempts to finally succeed in freeing themselves from it.  According to wikipedia, the word pagan is from Latin paganus, meaning "country dweller", "rustic".  That definition suggests to me, someone who is uneducated and quite superstitious to the point of fearfulness or paranoia.
(An automatic name-generator, for Pagans... they believe in the magical quality of words, in addition to that of certain objects, or fetishes.)
(Some Pagans dress themselves in a rather adolescent or clownish fashion; and some wear or use amulets similar to ones used by Qabbalists.)

At one point in his chapter on Greece and the Hellenistic influence on Judaism, Rabbi Potok off-handedly remarks that a popular Jewish folk hero of that era, Judah Maccabeus' surname "probably means hammer"... yet with no further comment, he leaves us to wonder about its significance.  Why would he bother to mention it, unless it held some sort of special meaning to Jews?

From Gould's "History of Freemasonry":  "The operative Mason of the Middle Ages in France and Germany knew nothing of a Jewish origin of his craft.  In case the traditions current in the thirteenth century, or later, had pointed back to the time of Solomon, in preparing the regulations for corporate government, and in order to obtain valuable exemptions, the prestige of the Israelitish king would have far transcended that of the holy martyrs, or Charles the Hammer-bearer."

It is obvious from the above statement, that the Freemasons didn't seek to advertise the Jewish origins of their organization.  Freemasonry, regardless of the names they attach to it, has always been above all -- a Secret Society.  Generally speaking, if they were truly doing good works -- there would be no need for secrecy.

"The Halliwell and Cooke MSS. [manuscripts] contain no mention of "Naymus Grecus" though they both take us back to an earlier stage of the Craft legend, and concur in placing the inception of Masonry, as an art [not as a simple craft], in Egypt.  On this point the testimony of all the early Masonic documents may be said to be in accord...

"The irradiations of the mysteries of Egypt shine through and animate the secret doctrines of Phoenicia, Asia Minor, Greece, and Italy."

"[Quoting Heckethorne]... the mysteries as they have come down to us... in a corrupt and aimless manner, in Freemasonry, have chiefly an astronomical bearing."

"[Gould, commenting on Heckethorne's observation]... showing to us the historical relationship between Freemasonry and the Secret Societies of antiquity..."

"In all mysteries, we encounter a God, a superior being, or an extraordinary man suffering death, to recommence a more glorious existence; everywhere the remembrance of a grand and mournful event plunges the nations into grief and mourning, immediately followed by the most lively joy... death as a means of reproduction... "

Again we see the neurotic obsession with reproduction, but here it is coupled with the twisted notion that life cannot exist without death and that Human beings have the right or duty to meddle with the delicate balance between the two.  Freemasons are content with the short-term benefits derived from stacking card decks in their own favor.  Delayed gratification, patience and real virtue are not in their repertoire.  Hence the lack of genuine faith or belief in God and their neurotic obsessions with magic, sorcery, alchemy, astrology, etc.

According to "History of Freemasonry", The mystical philosophy of the Jews, the Cabbala (also spelled Kabbala or Qabbalah, etc.), was traditionally handed directly down to them from Adam through Noah, Abraham, and Egypt.  They make it clear that Cabbala teachings were heavily influenced by Pagans.  Quoting an essay found in the "Book of Constitutions", c1738, "The Cabalists, another Sect, dealt in hidden and mysterious Ceremonies.  The Jews had a great Regard for this Science, and thought they made uncommon Discoveries by means of it."  [The "science" of Cabbala may be practiced either "Speculatively" or "Operatively" (in other words, either abstractly or concretely, pragmatically)].  "David and Solomon, they say, were exquisitely skilled in it; and no body at first presumed to commit it to Writing:  But (what seems most to the present Purpose) the perfection of their Skill consisted in what the Dissector [Samuel Pritchard] calls the Lettering of it, or by ordering the Letters of a Word in a particular Manner."

Quoting Fort... "the skeleton of Norse customs, upon which Judaistic ritualism was strung... Old Teutonic courts were a counterpart of such heathen symbols and ceremonies as the priesthood manipulated in the celebration of religious services.  When, therefore, the junction occurred which united the Gothic and Jewish elements of Freemasonry, by the merging of the Byzantine art corporations into the Germanic guilds in Italy, the Norsemen contributed the name and orientation, oaths, dedication of the lodge, opening and closing colloquies, masters' mallets and columns, and the lights and installation ceremonies.  On the other hand, Judaistic admixture is equally well defined.  From this source Masonry received the omnific word, or the faculty of Abrac and ritualism, including the Hiramic legend."  The footnote on this page reads:  "the Wey of Wynnyge the Facultye of Abrac... signifies the means by which the lost word may be recovered, or, at least, substituted."

Rabbi Chaim Potok describes how ancient Jewish scribes would sometimes re-write history (claiming Greek influence, after the re-telling of Homer).  Regarding the legend of Hiram, he states:  "Sometime during the fourth century BCE a writer composed a work of history that has come to be called Chronicles.  He lived in Judah and appears to have been the only historian of the ancient world who was not afraid to alter the traditions with which he worked:  he cannot believe that Solomon transferred Israelite cities to King Hiram of Tyre (I Kings 9:11), so he changes the text and has Hiram giving the cities to Solomon (II Chronicles 8:2); he ignores the northern kingdom; he uses the term Israel when he refers to Judah; the entire people sinned against God, not only the kings and noble families, hence the entire people was punished by exile.  He is not reporting facts, but using facts, often clearly distorted, in order to offer us his vision of the workings of God in history and to emphasize the idea of personal responsibility... An individual who has been punished has sinned.  The process of transformation of Biblical history has now begun."

So the honest rabbi Potok admits here, that scribes weren't above embellishing on the truth, the facts, in order to promote an ideology or doctrine.  In Chronicles, people who died in wars were never innocent bystanders, but always guilty of some unknown crime against "God".  Never mind that it was by the hands of men and not God, that they perished.  (I often hear people suggest that the sick, injured, raped, starving, poor, elderly, dead, etc., only got what they "deserved"; that if they were "nicer" or "smarter", or perhaps lovelier in appearance, they wouldn't be in such a predicament).
(The Mormon founders are associated with magick, via their study and use of the 'faculty of Abrac'.)
(Other names for Hiram:  Amon, Aymon, Anon, Aynone, Ajuon, Dyan, Benaim.  There was king Hiram of Tyre, a friend of Judea; he sent his servant, a Jew named Hiram Abif, of the tribe Nephtali, who was skilled in the craft of building, to Jerusalem in order to help build Solomon's temple.  According to "History of Freemasonry", Masonry is both the science and art of building; and like the Cabbala may be implemented in either abstract / speculative or concrete / practical forms.  Emphasis is placed on mastering the subjects of Geometry, Theory, Math, and Art or Design.)

"...under the cloak of symbols, borrowed from the Egyptians, pagan philosophy crept into the Jewish schools, where it afterwards served as the foundation upon which the Cabbalists formed their mystical system."

("American Folkloric Witchcraft" explains their beliefs, including their associations with Cain, Tubal Cain, et al)
("The White Witch"... There are obvious connections between Aryanism (the "white" or "shining" ones, who consider themselves superior to non-Aryans), which originated in Northern India, and Paganism.)

(A free online novel written from the Pagan point of view.   I gather from this and many other sources, that Pagans are very anti-Christ, anti-Christian -- except for those who practice Paganism on the sly:  disguised as monotheism.  And those types of Christians I've found to be very un-Christian in the true sense of the word; they very often hypocritically attack with vicious accusatory hostility more pious Christians, while cozying up warmly to most Pagans.  I believe that what Pagans all have in common -- whether closeted ones or not -- is their obsessive love of rituals, incantations, and blood sacrifices.  Also generally, especially their leaders, seem overly, greedily fond of material things, like gold, money, sex, food, etc.  They all behave as if there really is no after-life -- at least not for them.  They party hedonistically as if there is no future, hence all their many 'holidays', feasts, celebrations.  They spend so much time and energy on 'special' occasions, they've caused them to become mundane.)

An illustration from the "American Folkloric Witchcraft" website.

According to Chaim Potok, "The first scribe to emerge from obscurity since the time of Ezra is Ben Sira, who lived about 180 BCE.  The personality of the individual teacher now became discernible, a clear result of the influence of Greek custom.  The master-disciple relationship that became characteristic of Jewish learning appears to have had its roots in the academies in Athens, in the schools of Stoics and Epicureans.  That was the way organized thought was transmitted then -- from a master to disciples.  Masters would meet together with their disciples and talk of matters pertaining to the personal and communal life of the Jew.  They would meet in the temple precinct or in special houses of study.  The words bet midrash, house of learning, and yeshiva, seat, the location of the master, are found for the first time in the writings of Ben Sira.  The scribe, the master, the disciple, unconnected with court and cult -- this was the new kind of leadership.  Its beginnings were in the centuries when Hellenism came to Jerusalem.

"Some of the masters were poor and worked as laborers; others were wealthy and could have been members of the Sanhedrin [Jewish legislature] together with aristocratic landowners and priests.  They formed the elite of the Pietist masses and wanted peace, for only under settled conditions could the people be educated effectively into a life in accordance with the law.  In the tranquillity of urban and countryside homes, against a distant background of clashing weapons and bloody conquest, they taught the importance of law and study.  'Let your house be a meeting place for the wise,' said one sage.  'Take a teacher and acquire a companion,' said another.  All believed and taught that Moses received the Torah from Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua, and Joshua to the elders or judges and the judges to the prophets, and the prophets transmitted it to the members of the Great Assembly, about whom we know almost nothing save that they were regarded by tradition as having been contemporary with Ezra the scribe.  The men of the Great Assembly were reputed to have taught the importance of care and patience in the dispensing of justice, the need to raise up many disciples, and the importance of surrounding the covenant stipulations with a fence of precautionary measures in order to ensure that the stipulations themselves would never be breached.

"The finest minds of the land were attracted to these Pharisee masters, the sages.  Anyone with a gift of will and mind -- rich man, poor man [note, not "women" -- we're talking about a strictly Patriarchal society, after all], convert -- could rise to the status of a sage.  As masters and disciples met and studied together, they would talk of festivals, ritual purity, marital relations, civil and criminal law, behavior toward the poor, treatment of children and parents, responsibilities of government authorities -- every aspect of the people's life came under the sacred canopy of the law.  The oral law was not a secret doctrine but one the sages wished to make known to all the people.  Hence while John Hyrcanus and Alexander Janneus were conquering and Judaizing vast stretches of Palestine with sword and spear and non-Jewish mercenaries, the sages were spiritualizing every bright and shadowed corner of existence.

(Note that by contrasting the Jewish oral or common law against "secret doctrine", Potok implies that there did indeed exist a "secret doctrine", one which was not publicly discussed or revealed.)

"The beginnings of the oral law go back a long way before these sages and are lost to history; but the main development of that law began when Greece brushed Jerusalem and the text of the covenant had to be made vital for this new confrontation with an alien reality.  New customs needed to be rooted in the covenant.  This was done through a newly developed system of text interpretation which was itself believed to have been given to Moses at Sinai but which had much in common with the way Greek scholars in Alexandria were then reinterpreting embarrassing passages in Homer.  All the civilized world at that time held in common the sanctity of ancient writings; all wanted to preserve that sanctity and ensure the continued life of those writings by reinterpretation.  We keep alive creations of the past by infusing them with resonance for the present.

[Much the way our modern schools now re-write and reinterpret history.]

"In the time of Alexander Janneus, when Pharisees fought their king and thousands were slain, many Pharisees fled from the land.  Some went to Alexandria, where they encountered a city of straight wide streets, canals, temples, libraries, a museum and theater -- a glittering Greek city in the midst of the wealth and bloated alluvial decay that was Ptolemaic Egypt.  No doubt they met with the Jews of the city, who spoke Greek and knew no Hebrew, were eager to obtain citizenship, were producing poets, playwrights, and historians who wrote in Greek, and would soon produce the philosopher Philo, who was raised in a home devoted to the Jewish faith, probably knew no Hebrew, and would become one of the most important thinkers in the development of western civilization.  They witnessed the absence of Jewish schools for children; there were schools only for Jewish adults on the Sabbath; Jews were eager to enroll their children in Greek gymnasiums.  The Pharisees would have seen that the Alexandrian Jewish community now had the Greek translation of the covenant, the version known as the Septuagint, that the Jews had built many synagogues, one so large the voice of the reader could barely be heard in the back rows, had become thoroughly assimilated to Greek ways and thought, and were fierce in their loyalty to Jerusalem and the temple.

(Note that the Septuagint was written by Jewish Pharisees... Also, I'm fairly certain that the "adults" and "children" whom the Jews wished to educate in their own public schools and in Greek gymnasiums, were probably 99.9% male.  Most Jewish women and girls were treated like second class citizens, whose place was in the home as a type of servant, with no need for a formal education.  Women and girls received their educations from their female elders, not at schools with the men and boys.  They only learned how to keep house, make clothing, cook, be "nice", etc.)

"When Salome Alexandra became queen of Judea in 76 BCE she invited the Pharisees to return to the land and the royal council, the Sanhedrin.  She was weary of the civil strife that was weakening the land.

"An extraordinary period of Pharisaic creativity followed.  The queen ran the foreign policy of the land; the Pharisees controlled religious affairs and what we might today call the Department of the Interior.  The Sadducees were removed from positions of leadership because of the part they had played in advising Janneus to wage war upon the Pharisees.  One of the Sadducees, an adviser to Janneus, was tried by a Pharisee court and sentenced to death, along with many other high-ranking Sadducees.  Pagans had no monopoly on the brutalizing effects of power.

(Note here again, evidence of a strong connection among the Jewish elite between their modes of formal schooling and religion.  The topic of religion had so long been a typical part of public schooling in most cultures, that it has been only in recent times omitted from most curricula.)

"The land lay washed in a haze of economic prosperity in the time of the only queen in the history of the Hasmonean dynasty [ie Salome].  There was an abundance of rain and revenue.  During this time of plenty lived a poor man, a dealer in flax who constantly walked the roads.  He was Shimon ben ("son of") Shetah, the most influential Pharisee of his day.  Legends grew around him.  It was said of him that he hanged eighty women for witchcraft in Ashkelon, in keeping with covenant law.  But Ashkelon was too briefly in the hands of the Jews during the reign of Salome for that tale to edge into truth [really? lol].  Almost nothing is known of his life save that he treated the Sadducees harshly, instituted an ordinance that mortgaged the property of a husband to the divorce settlement of a wife, thereby protecting the interests of the woman [really? lol], and created the institution of the public school.

"Prior to that time, from Ezra to the Hasmonean period, a father taught his son the covenant law, for that act of teaching was itself a covenant stipulation:  'And you shall impress them upon your children.'  Now the Pharisees, controlling as they did the internal affairs of the land, created a system of public schools.  'All children must go to school,' stipulated Shimon ben Shetah.  A later Pharisee, Joshua ben Gamala, spelled out this general rule by specifying that each district and each town should have a free school for children.  The covenant and its oral traditions could be transmitted most effectively only in schools."

So public schooling is actually the best method of teaching a standardized religious law, and has in fact been utilized in that fashion for many centuries by various societies.  But Chaim Potok points out that a Pharisaic Jew, Shimon ben Shetah, was the original creator of that particular institution.  In early Colonial America, teachers were called, 'school-masters' -- and all were males.  Only a bit later, during the settling of the Western Frontier, did women begin to work as teachers (probably out of necessity, since the men were needed for labor, etc.).  Female teachers were once often referred to as school-mistresses -- but not for long.

According to "History of Freemasonry", the symbols, metaphors, and emblems of the Freemasons have been divided by Dr. Armstrong into three different species:  1 - those derived from the various forms of heathenism, ie sun, serpent, light and darkness; 2 - those derived from the Mason's craft, as the square and compasses; 3 - those derived from the Holy Land, ie the Temple of Solomon, the East, the Ladder of Jacob, etc.
(Here is a guy on youtube, who knows a lot about Freemasonry, and enjoys teaching the public about it.  He presents himself as a true Christian, but I believe that he is actually a Freemason, himself mocking Christianity.  He goes into great depth and detail about the Craft, including its many 'sacred' symbols, but you have to keep in mind that he is biased and probably deceptive at some level.  He has an agenda.  Also, notice his handle:  "gorilla"; I'd bet he has a considerable amount of Neanderthal genes, and probably Jewish or at least Aryan ancestry.)

The first and second types of Masonic symbolism listed above were incorporated into the "Vehmic Institution" (founded by Charlemagne for the purpose of waging covert war against Saxons); the third type, from the Holy Land, are utilized by Freemasonry for the purpose of "crusading" -- in other words, for evangelizing and promoting their religion.  All or most of the symbols are used also in official lodge ceremonies of initiation, recognition, etc..
(Most Saxons converted to Christianity in about 597 AD.  Charlemagne's reign began in 768, so the Vehmic Courts were obviously anti-Christian / anti-Christ.)
(Full text of the historic Anglo Saxon Chronicle.)
(This writer sees connections between the Vehmic Courts and lynching, the KKK... Lynch-law:  an investigation into the history of lynching in the United States [c1905 by James Elbert Cutler, PhD]... I'd already figured out that the Ku Klux Klan is actually run by Jews; so this doesn't surprise me at all.)
(Secret signals and coded signs or symbols were very much a part of the Vehmic Institution, a form of covert war on select civilian populations.)

A symbol of the Vehmic Court

A Vehmic Oath Skull

Another one; they must be fairly popular, they're all over the internet for sale:  $19,850 for this one.

Arnsberg, Germany

Other Heathen or Pagan practices of Freemasonry include worship of "Dieties of Vengeance".  "Doomsmen (like the Asi of old) before the altars of Thor or Woden were often seen in old Icelandic courts, and in English jurisdictions "mystery" was dispersed and the whole system passed into the ordinary machinery of the law" (History of Freemasonry).

The problem with "secret societies" is that initiates never fully know what it really is, that they're getting mixed up with.

A cartoon from a c1893 Victorian era book of 'humor' aimed at a Freemason audience, "The Adventures of Uncle Jeremiah and Family at the Great Fair -- Their Observations and Triumph".  The book is like a walk through a Moroccan bazaar, with Masons swaggering around in their fezzes.  A lot of innuendo and a few racial slurs thrown in.

The Holy Vehme was an oath "... to conceal... from wife and child, father and mother, sister and brother, fire and wind, all that the sun shines on and the rain wets, and from everything between heaven and earth; and bring before the tribunal everthing within his knowledge that fell under its jurisdiction."  Sounds familiar, like our own government.  Citizens are expected to be completely open and forthright about every minute detail of our lives, when interacting with the bureaucracy, priests, or corporate employers -- yet the same standards are not held toward government officials and other so-called "elites", who cry "privacy", "privileged information", or "restricted", when certain questions are asked of them.
(Obama "born in Kenya", according to the blurb on his own book... Why would he lie about his place of birth, if it's really insignificant?)
(By the way, I believe that both Bradley Manning and Julian Assange are in the Neanderthal / Hybrid category [both were motivated by greed].  But I also believe that the government has no right to keep so much knowledge and information from US citizens, who pay for all of it with taxes and hard labor.)

The Vehmic Institution employed secret signals (of greeting, orders, etc.), which were taught to initiates.  During the initiation ceremonies a rope and knife were brought out; on the knife was engraved the cryptic initials, "S. S. G. G.", which the authors claim were supposed to mean, "Strick, Stein, Gras, Grein", or "knitting rock, whining grass".  That sounds rather obscure to me, don't know what it means to them -- but I'm sure it has a Pagan, possibly Druid origin.

At Vehmic courts, a local chief, or "Friegraff" appeared with a table, sword, and a "cord of withe (willow twigs)".  "Heimliche acht" (eight secret) judges assembled, "under the oak or under the limetree... in broad daylight and before the eye of heaven.

According to "History of Freemasonry", the Knights Templar was the old name for Freemasonry.  They speculate that the name was changed either when the group's function switched from the practical body to that of a secret society; or, to indicate a merger between the practical body and the secret society, the higher degrees, "inner circle, the imperium in imperio (empire of empires, in Italian)".
(I also recently ran across this fraternity, the Knights of Pythias; I know nothing at all about them, they're shrouded in deep mystery as far as I'm concerned.)

The Rosicrucians is also associated with Freemasonry, the Qabalah, and Heraldry.  Wikipedia claims that it was originally associated with Protestantism, especially Lutheranism, although I know of Catholics who were quite interested in the ideology.  (Personally, I believe that Freemasonry in some form or another has permeated practically every State established and supported major religion, along with most world governments and civic organizations.  They accomplished that, by accepting people of every religion into their club.  Some Freemasons are Atheists, too -- despite their 'official' prerequisite that every initiate must "believe in some -- any -- higher power".)

The Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum

These 'orders' or fraternities often claim to promote "peace", lol.  Jeremiah 6:14, "They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace."  They're hypocrites, because if these powerful organizations have not yet brought true peace and other goodwill to this planet, it can only be because they don't really want it that much.  They have all the resources to further their actual intent.

"...the manifestos opposed Roman Catholicism and its preference for dogma over empiricism. They also rejected Muhammed, though they traced their philosophy and science to the Moors, asserting that it had been kept secret for 120 years until the intellectual climate might receive it."

So maybe their connection to the Vatican in Rome is also a secret.  Many converted Jews entered the ecclesiastical hierarchy of the Catholic church, and a lot of people believe that at least a few Popes (including the last one and the one now in office) are Jewish.  I get the sense that Mormons and Jews share a lot of ideology with one another, and also with Muslims (for example polygamy, a custom well-suited to Darwinists, closet Darwinists, and Nazis).

"History of Freemasonry" authors quote Mosheim, "...the title of the Rosy Cross was given to chymists who united the study of religion and chemistry, and that the term is alchemical, being not 'rosa', a rose, but 'ros', dew.  Of all natural bodies, dew is the most powerful dissolvent of gold, and a cross in the language of fire philosophers (alchemists) is the same as lux, the seed or menstruum of the Red Dragon, or that gross and corporeal light, which, being properly digested and modified, produces gold.  A Rosicrucian philosopher, therefore, is one who, by means of dew, seeks for light, ie, for the Philosopher's Stone -- which, by the way, the Rosicrucians always denied to be their great aim, in fact, although they boasted of many secrets, they always maintained that this was the least.  The other versions are false and deceptive, having been given by chemists (alchemists) who were fond of concealment.  The true import of the title (Rosicrucians) was perceived (or imagined to be so) by Gassendi in his "Examen Philosophiae Fluddiannae", and better still, by the celebrated French physician Renaudot in his "Conferences Publiques, iv. 87".

Lux or Lucifer, the "Light Bringer"... an engraving by Gustave Dore.

The Luxor, an Egyptian themed hotel in Las Vegas.
The flag of Wales is a Red Dragon.  The Prince of Wales (Charles) is in line for the throne of England.

("Queen Elizabeth II gives First Lady Michelle Obama a Masonic handshake during their initial meeting in London!

"We should not be surprised, for President Obama is a 32nd Degree Prince Hall Mason, and the Queen is the head of the House of Windsor, who is reputed to be the top leader in global Illuminized Freemasonry.

"Queen Elizabeth II is most definitely giving Michelle Obama the Masonic handshake known as the "Pass Grip of a Master Mason", page 161, "Codex Magica: The Innermost Secrets of the Illuminati Beckon You!"

"At nearly every important event in the Daily News, the Masons have their stamp on key people and on key events. Since the President and Michelle Obama were meeting the Queen because they were attending the G-20 summit meeting in London, we should understand that the entire summit was the work of the Global Masonic Brotherhood.")
("Queen Elizabeth is a descendant of Hebrew Egyptian lineage")

Queen Elizabeth is very good friends with the Catholic Pope; both are under investigation for child trafficking and 'crimes against Humanity'.

(It's hard to find anything in the mainstream media now, about Vatican or Royal corruption... only this article about the arrest of the Pope's butler, for leaking information to the outside world.  They must have hushed it up almost entirely.)

Royal Freemasons are nothing new; they've been at it for a long time... English and other European Royalty are probably pseudo-Jews, or crypto-Jews.

One of the Australian (New South Wales) government's paid agents -- wearing Masonic symbolism on his official uniform.
Fraternal Order of Police (American).
Like most Masons, this blogger mocks those of us whom they consider "outsiders".

I believe Icke is actually one of them (Illuminati), but he sure is a wealth of semi-reliable information.

The authors of History of Masonry go on to point out that the Rose is carried by the Pope during Mid Lent Sunday parades; was once worn by English clergy (probably Church of England or Episcopalian) in their buttonholes; that Christ himself is referred to with names like, "the Rose of Sharon" and "the Prime rose and lily"; and that it is the flower of the planet Venus (often associated by certain types of mystics, with Jesus or the Messiah), etc.
("Monday evening local time the sanctuary of the Virgen de la Caridad de Cobre in Cuba received a gift: Pope Benedict XVI. honoured it with a golden rose, a custom going back to the middle ages, popes used to hold such a golden rose during a procession on fourth Sunday of lent, called Laetare. Pope Eugene III. called this rose a sign of Christ’s passion: the gold symbolizing the resurrection and the thorns the suffering.")

Then they add a Gnostic proverb, "By dew is confessed the Godhead of the Lord Jesus"; also (in the same breath), that the Sethites and Ophites, as the emblematical serpent worshippers were called, held that the dew which fell from the excess of light was wisdom, the hermaphrodite deity.

As a footnote, they comment, "Why not 'Rhos', in Welsh 'a marsh'... It is a pity that so promising an opportunity for bringing in the Druids has hitherto been neglected... perhaps some might take the hint."  (Druid priests practiced witchcraft, magic, and Human sacrifice.  I don't find those to be admirable traits, not even in 'fun' or 'pretend'.  However, I don't get the sense that Freemasonry is strictly about fun-and-games, fantasy, or anything other than serious business.)

They point out that the Rose and Cross is often represented in Heraldry and in German surnames such as Rosecranz, Rosencranz, and Rosecreutz.

"...heraldic ensigns were primarily borne by the hierarchy of the skies... The gentility of the great ancestor of our race (who they claim is Adam) is stoutly maintained, and by an enthusiastic armorist of the 17th century, two coats of arms were assigned to him.  One as borne in Eden, and another suitable to his condition after the fall... arms are assigned to the following personages, all of whom we meet with in the legend of the Craft, viz., Jabal, the inventor of tents (vert, a tent argent); Jubal, the primeval musician (azure, a harp or, on a chief argent three rests gules), Tubal-Cain, (sable, a hammer argent crowned or), and Naamah his sister, the inventress of weaving (in a lozenge gules, a carding-comb argent).
("Cain -- the Forgotten Father"; this site explains how the secret doctrine was passed down.  "If the Rulers have the Divine Right to govern, the true initiate will cheerfully obey".  Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma.  I guess I'm not a true initiate, then.)

"A knight was made before any cote armour, whereof Olibion was the first that ever was.  Asteriall his father, came of the line of that woorthie gentleman Iapheth and sawe the people multiplie having no governor, and that the cursed people of Sem warred against them.  Olibion being a mighty man and strong, the people cryed on him to be their governor.  A thousand men were then mustered of Iapheth's line.  Asteriall made to his Sonne a garland of nine diverse precious stones in token of Chevalrie (chivalry), to bee the Governor of a thousand men.  Olibion kneeled to Asteriall his father, and asked his blessing:  Asteriall tooke Iaphetes Fauchen (falchion, or a large sickle-shaped knife similar to a Persian scimitar) that Tubal (Tubal-Cain) made before the fludde (flood), and smote flatling (with the flat side of the knife) nine times upon the right shoulder of Olibion, in token of the nine Vertues of Chevalrie."  (Fern, "Blazon of Gentrie 1586; and Gerard Leigh, "Accedence of Armorie, 1597, pp 23,24).
(The nine virtues of Asatru -- almost identical to the virtues of Chivalry... Courage, Truth, Honor, Fidelity, Discipline, Hospitality, Industriousness, Self Reliance, Perseverance)
(The nine Worthies:  three Jews, three Pagans, and three Christian Knights.)
(Prowesse, Courage, Honesty, Loyalty, Largesse, Faith, Courtesy, Modesty, Franchise)
The coat of arms for the Prince of Wales.

Cluj / Kolozsvár / Klausenburg family coat of arms (Romania).

The masonic authors of "History of Freemasonry" also found interesting, a series of mysterious letters that were addressed to the Gottingen (lower Saxony, Germany) library during the years 1610-17, under apparent pseudonyms, which were evidently applications to some secret society, that the authors presumed was Freemasonry.  "...As qualifications most assert their skills in alchemy and Cabbalism...".
("Short Talk Bulletin" volume XIII, January, 1935, No. 1; "AHIMAN REZON" by 'unknown'.  This article admits the Jewish / Hebrew origins of the phrase, which means according to "History of Freemasonry":  literally,  'the will of selected brethren'; which they interpret as, 'law of a class or society of men who are chosen or selected from the rest of the world as brethren'.

So, do you still believe what they teach us in our compulsory public school educations -- that we live in a national democratic republic, which provides for the equality of all citizens?  That your vote actually counts for something meaningful?  That all citizens regardless of race, creed, color, class, or gender, etc., are free from discrimination and enjoy true equal opportunity under the Law?  If so, you are sadly mistaken.  You've been deceived by the most accomplished criminal liars of all time.

From "Wanderings, Chaim Potok's History of the Jews":  "Then Hisdai ibn Shaprut [the Jewish court physician for the Muslim caliph of Spain] learned of the existence of a Jewish kingdom somewhere in a distant land beyond the Black Sea.  He is reported to have sent this letter:  'From Hisdai ibn Shaprut to the king of the Khazars.  The kings of the Franks, the kings of the Gebalim, who are Germans, the king of Constantinople and others bring costly presents to the caliph to gain his favor.  All their gifts pass through my hands and I am charged with making gifts in return...

'I always ask the ambassadors of these monarchs who bring the gifts about our breathern [brethren], the Israelites, the remnant of the Captivity.  At length, mercantile emissaries... told me that there is a kingdom of the Jews who are called Khazars... Now therefore let it please your Majesty... to command your scribe to send back a reply from your distant land and to inform me fully concerning the condition of the Israelites and how they came to dwell there.

'When we first heard the fame of my Lord the King and power of his dominions we lifted up our head, our spirit revived.  The kingdom of my lord furnished us with an answer to the taunt: "Every other people has its kingdom, but of yours there is no memorial on earth."'

The reply, according to Potok, "From Joseph the king son of Isaac the king, to Hisdai son of Isaac son of Ezra.  I wish to inform you that your beautifully phrased letter was given us by Isaac son of Eliezer, a Jew of the land of Germany, who has carried it through Germany, Hungary, and Russia to Khazaria.  Know that we are descended from Japhet, through his son Togarmah, the father of the Turks.  The land in which I now live was formerly occupied by the Bulgarians.  Our ancestors, the Khazars, came and fought with them... They left while the Khazars pursued them as far as the Danube River...

"Many generations passed until a certain king arose whose name was Bulan.  The kings of the Byzantines and the Arabs who had heard of him sent their ambassadors... with the object of converting him to their own religion.  But the king... sent for a learned Israelite...

"The king said to the Christian priest:  'What do you think?  Of the religion of the Jews and the Muslims which is to be preferred?'  The priest answered:  'The religion of the Israelites is better than that of the Muslims.'

"The king then asked the Muslim scholar:  'What do you say?  Is the religion of the Israelites or that of the Christians better?'  The Muslim scholar answered:  'The religion of the Israelites is preferable.'

"Upon this the king said:  'You both have admitted with your own mouths that the religion of the Israelites is better.  Wherefore, trusting in the mercies of God, I choose the religion of Israel.'

"From that time on the Almighty helped Bulan and strenthened him.  Bulan circumcised himself, his servants, attendants, and all his people.  Then Bulan brought from all plances wise men who interpreted the Torah for him, and up to this day we have been subject to this religion [Talmudic Judaism]...

"I dwell at the delta of the Volga.  I guard the mouth of the river and do not permit the Russians, who come in ships, to enter into the Caspian so as to get at the Muslims.  I have to wage war with them, or they would lay waste the whole land of the Muslims as far as Baghdad..."

The Khazar / Turkish king, a descendant of Noah's son Japheth (father of all Asians and of Gentiles or Pagans), thought himself wise and his decision rational; but I'm only impressed by the fact that Muslims and Christians got along together the least, of the three religions.  It's quite apparent that Jews and Muslims have historically enjoyed a much more brotherly political relationship, overall.  And in fact, DNA science now proves that they're very closely related, genetically.  Both have a considerable quantity of Asian DNA (compared to Western Europeans, who are more Caucasian than Asian), and both have significant Neanderthal gene inheritance (more than the average Caucasian European).

In Noah's time, there were only the three main races, derived from his three surviving sons after the Flood; however since that time obviously there has been a lot of mixing not only of races, but also of species, within the Human population.

Hisdai ibn Shaprut, the Court physician to the Muslim caliph of Spain, was like many Jews, obsessively ambitious.  This passage from Wanderings clearly exposes the lengths he would go, to keep the spotlight on himself alone:

"The physician [ibn Shaprut, who held a great deal of power and influence in the caliph's Court] encouraged poetry and philology [a combination of literary studies, history and linguistics].  [The caliph was a patron of the Arts, and I'm sure ibn Shaprut did all he could to satisfy his cravings for beauty and knowledge.  Even so, the caliph, upon his deathbed, declared that he'd enjoyed only fourteen days of real happiness in his entire life.  Ibn Shaprut also supported Judaism by purchasing many volumes of books both old and new, by Jewish authors.]  There were at the time a number of Arab philologists in Cordova.  The sanctity of the Koran and its language had sparked Arab interest in the study of the structure of Arabic.  In Christian Europe at this time scholars would gather and debate matters of theology; in Cordova Arab scholars would discuss linguistics.

"Jews were caught up in this zeal for words and grammar.  A man named Menahem ibn Saruk was born in northeastern Spain.  Very early he discovered an interest in Hebrew philology and Bible commentaries.  He left behind the economic and cultural poverty of his home and city and wandered southward through Spain.  In Cordova he was taken into the home of a wealthy man., the brother of Hisdai ibn Shaprut.  He served as the family poet -- a custom in those days among the wealthy.  Special occasions were marked by poems composed by the family laureate.  In time the poet became Hebrew secretary to Hisdai ibn Shaprut.  This left him sufficient time to research and write a dictionary of the Hebrew language, a work which pioneered Hebrew philology in Spain.  The treatise made him famous, gained him enemies [? why?] and, for reasons that are not entirely clear -- some say he was accused of Karaite sympathies -- lost him the favor of his patron.  Hisdai ibn Shaprut was capable of despotic action at times.  He withdrew his patronage from Menahem ibn Saruk, had him beaten, and ordered that his home be destroyed.  The embittered poet and grammarian, lamenting his sudden bewildering loss of favor, returned to his birthplace."

I get the sense that it was jealousy, which drove Hisdai ibn Shaprut to destroy the life of a man who was possibly more brilliant and potentially more famous than himself.

According to Potok, the Jews enjoyed much more power while under Muslim rule, than when the Catholics were enthroned in Europe; so it was with great joy that they received them, and great sorrow when the caliphs were later driven out of Spain:

"The Jews, many of whom were practicing their faith secretly, welcomed the invaders.  The Muslims would assemble the Jews of a conquered area and make them the garrison force of captured towns.  This occurred in Cordova, Granada, Seville, and Toledo.  From a condition of slavery [? fact is, the Jews themselves owned slaves, while under Roman Catholic rule -- they simply weren't allowed to own Catholic slaves] the Jews were abruptly raised to the status of allies of the peninsula's new rulers.  The Visigothic nobles had fled northward.  Jews took over their abandoned estates.  Together with Christians [ie Catholics], the Jews would soon be paying the heavy tax levied by Islam against monotheists who did not believe in Mohammed and Allah."

Potok also relates in Wanderings, that both of the medieval Jewish "messiahs", Shabbetai Zevi and Jacob Frank, were undoubtedly homosexuals who often held sexual orgies.

Potok points out that in America, most of the mayors of frontier towns were Jewish, because they possessed above-average educations, due to their strictly organized compulsory tradition of schooling their youth (European Jews have historically also been wealthier than the average indigenous European, due to their preferred occupations involving things like metalsmithing, minting, banking, importing, exporting, shipping, slave trading, international travel and mercantilism).  However, since the German Nazi 'Holocaust', "... most of the gentle Jews are gone.  Yes, the Jew is now solidly inside the affairs of the world.  Yes, we are aware of the resonance of hate that lingers like a stench upon western civilization.  Yes, we will continue to be the other, to hold our own view of things.  Yes, we are a single people, capable of loving our separate lands as well as Israel -- as one is able to love a mother and a father.  Yes, there will be peace one day.  Yes, we will renew our people.  Yes we touch millennia of precious history when we walk the streets of Jerusalem, and climb the hills, and journey through the sand wastes of the land.  Yes, there are flowers to plant, seedlings to nuture, young trees to tend, old earth to nourish, and new earth to put in -- a garden of new dreams to bring forth, to add to old covenants and messianic hopes, and to offer to ourselves and to our broken and beloved world.  Yes.

"Gentle" Jews... was Potok playing with words here?  Both "gentle" and "gentile" are based on the Latin, "gentilis".  "Gentle" was first used in English, in the 13th century, to mean "chivalrous, honorable, distinguished, kind, amiable, tractable, docile, soft, delicate, moderate" (depending on context); while "gentile" was first used in English later, in the 14th century.

Gentile supposedly means, and is used to suggest, "heathen, pagan, an idolator".  Merriam Webster defines it as a Jewish religious term meaning, "often capitalized: a person of a non-Jewish nation or of non-Jewish faith; especially: a Christian as distinguished from a Jew".  (A pagan, from paganus, means a country-born person, a 'rustic' -- ie not a cosmopolitan or urban type.)

Yet, in the ancient Hebrew scriptures, Genesis 10:1-5 defines "Gentiles" as being the sons or descendants of Japheth (Asians, Eurasians and Indo-Europeans -- not Caucasians, who are Semites descended from Noah's son, Shem).  Therefore, that would make most modern Jews (92+% by their own estimates), who are not true Semites but Japheths descended from Ashkenaz -- Gentiles.  For them to refer to anyone as "Gentile" is of utmost hypocrisy and awfully deceptive.  Scripture was speaking of blood lineage, not religious affiliation, in those verses.  At the time that it was written, Talmudic Judaism did not yet exist.

But I must say, it appears that he is correct:  most of the gentle Jews are "gone".

For some weird reason, modern Jews claim their ethnicity matrilineally -- despite the fact that they are a Patriarchal society in every other way, including in the scriptures which they claim as their own.  It's true that many of their (modern Jews') mtDNA lineages are Caucasoid, but most of their yDNA is Asian, Indo-European (ie Eurasian) or Negroid.
Jewish Nazis, past and present... Hitler was himself a Jew (with North African yDNA E1b1b), whose main preoccupation and obsession was to compensate for his own genetic defects (he was a hermaphrodite and impotent, couldn't conceive children) by 'purifying' the Jewish 'race'.  His method was like any animal husbandry:  selection coupled with culling or purging of unwanted 'stock'.

Nazis were (and Neo-nazis often are today) Freemasons, and as such their elite members practiced Paganism and Witchcraft or Alchemy combined with Talmudic Judaism and Qabbalism.  Freemasons historically have hidden their "Jewish" roots from public scrutiny, and have always recruited initiates from among all state-sanctioned and established religions.  Perhaps the Holocaust was a means for them to rid themselves of all pious Jews -- true Israelites -- who would never have approved of a secret society so evil.  The earliest Christians too, hated and persecuted as heretics by the Jews, came from amongst the most pious of Israelites (Potok states his belief that John the Baptist was an Essene).

Apparently Secret Society Paganism infiltrated ancient Judah, gradually taking over all of the Jews' positions of power -- including the priesthood.  That's probably what caused the early split between Israel and Judah in the Old Kingdoms.  (I personally find the much reviled King Saul to have been a far more pious, humble, noble, admirable and godly person, than either David or Solomon).  These imposters who have long posed as true Jews, as the "Chosen People", have finally succeeded in completing the transformation of authentic Jewry into something else:  a den of Hybrids, serpent worshippers.  And they've done it so secretively, so furtively, that even their own commoners, the orthodox believers among them -- are unaware of it.  They simply obey what their priests and rabbis have commanded since time immemorial.  They are terrified to do otherwise.

Freemasons have nearly succeeded in forming a new World Religion, governed by the New World Order.  We have no separation of Church and State in America, contrary to our Law, the US Constitution, Bill of Rights.  Yet most of our citizens have never, ever done anything to stop it; never stood up and fought for their divine Rights of Liberty.  Like the orthodox Jews, they seem mentally programmed in a cultish fashion, quite content with the status quo, and terrified to oppose "authority".

As for the Israelites of the Northern kingdom, today's Jews proclaim that they somehow got "lost".  I tend to think that most of them eventually became Christians of one type or another.  The biblical scribes in Revelation also replaced the tribe of Dan with that of another (in order to maintain the number, twelve, when in reality there ought to be thirteen tribes).
(This is about the Khazars, and has nothing much to do with the naming of the thirteen tribes of Israel.  However, Joseph's two sons are both supposed to be counted as separate tribes, taking the place of Joseph himself... that was how Jacob wanted it.)

"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew."  (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).

"Khazar, an ancient Turkic speaking people who ruled a large and powerful state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century to their demise in the mid 11th century A.D... In the 8th Century it's political and religious head... as well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility, abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism... (The Khazars are believed to be the ancestors of most Russian and Eastern European Jews)."  (Encyclopedia Americana 1985)

"Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania."  (The Jewish Encyclopedia)

"The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz... Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim... About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim."  (The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia)

The "Biblical Ashkenaz" was one of the descendants of Noah's son, Japheth, the father of all Asians (and according to the Bible in Genesis, all Gentiles).  Noah's other son, Shem, was the father of true Semites, the Caucasians or Israelites (including Jesus of Nazareth, the Galilean -- Galilee is in the North kingdom, in Israel, not in what was ancient Judah).  Noah's third son, Ham, was the father of all Africans.

You might ask why people who are only "Jewish" by religious conversion and not by blood, might wish to pass themselves off as the "chosen people" of God.  The answer is in the Talmud.  Jews (pracitioners of the religion, Judaism) are taught to hate all "Gentiles"; that "Gentiles" are even lower than animals.  They do not consider Gentiles to be at all Human.  And they falsely teach their own and others, that Jews are not "Gentiles".  They teach that Gentiles deserve to be treated like slaves or like beasts of burden.  They do not wish to be identified with, or associated with, "Gentiles".  The Talmud allows Jews to treat Gentiles with the utmost cruelty -- even murdering a Gentile isn't punishable by their religious law.  Jews are encouraged to exclude Gentiles from all nourishment, care, or shelter.  They are encouraged to steal or take whatever they wish from any Gentile, without any repercussions.

I'd already noted the genetic similarities between modern Jews, Arabs, and Indo-Europeans or Aryans, based on my research into DNA.  At first, I was only trying to figure out my own ethnic identity.  I knew that I was Cherokee matrilineally, but I wanted to know more about my family's mitochondrial haplogroup:  "W".  I learned that "W" is vaguely associated with some Jews and some Aryan types, particularly some located in Northern India and Southern Pakistan.  I also learned that it's associated with the "X" clades (I was originally classified as an "X", in fact), and that haplogroup "X" is associated with rhesus negative bloodlines and with the Illuminati.

Then I learned some very disturbing things about the Illuminati, which caused me to dearly hope that I'm not related to them!  Even their boastful and persistent propaganda couldn't convince me that they are "superior".  Now I realize with a great sense of relief that we probably are not very closely related, because my family's rare subclade, our branch of the 'family' tree, separated itself somehow from the Old World branches in ancient times.  Cherokees (or Iroquois) are among the peoples who chose to live in North America, isolated from the Old World.  So, unless perchance descended from Norse Vikings, our family probably traces back matrilineally in North America to around 10,000 years ago, or more.  The earliest North American remains have been proven to be Caucasoid, although admitting the fact seems to generate controversy for a lot of people.  Many Cherokees today, believe they are descended from or somehow related to the Jews matrilineally, and they are correct.  But although very similar, we are yet distinctively different in certain aspects of our genome.  And most Jews are in denial about the relationship anyway, causing a lot of hurt or angry feelings among many Cherokees.

Nevertheless, the Old World branches of my mtDNA Haplogroup proved to be worthy of further investigation.  I'd quite easily noticed the genetic relationships between Jews, Muslims or Arabs, and Gypsies -- long before running across the old book (c1898) by Richard Francis Burton, "The Jew, The Gypsy and El Islam".  Like so many other intellectual Jews (Burton is a Jewish surname), his book was banned for being too truthful and honest.  The list of Jewish writers who have been persecuted by their own people is a long one.  Burton's book received the usual inflammatory brand:  "anti-semitic!", and as such has been almost completely ignored.  People who read it and take it seriously, are treated like criminals, racists, bad folks.  Yet if one reads it with an open mind, you would see that Mr. Burton was completely objective and rational.  He even begins the book with generous praise of the Jews, expressing no hatred whatsoever, only admiration.
(Search engine for Jewish surnames.)
("It's a trick, we always use it:  calling people 'anti-semitic'".)
"Tract Bechoroth (on Primogeniture, fourth of the fifth order, Seder Kodashim, Of Holy Things) gives (i. 17) the formula of the Scribes' prayers, and tells us that there are two things which hinder men from keeping the law of God -- the action of demons and dependence upon Gentiles.  The Lord explains to the angels that usury is permitted only to the Hebrews, who, being ordered to give thanks after food, praise their Creator even when they have eaten only an egg or an olive (p. 20).  A Jew may not pray before a naked Gentile, though the latter be in the category of a wild beast (p. 25).  This tract relates that a Jew, beaten by a Scribe when detected in adultery with an Egyptian woman, complained to a Gentile ruler that the law had been taken into private hands.  The Scribe pleaded that he had surprised the criminal [the Jew] with a she-ass [the Egyptian woman], and called the prophet Elijah to bear witness.  "Why didst thou not slay him?" asked the magistrate.  The reply was that, since the children of Israel had been driven from their own country, such a punishment could not be inflicted by them, but that the judge could do as he pleased.  When both left the court, the Jew charged the Scribe with having called Elijah as a witness to a lie.  "Wretch!" exclaimed the learned man, "and are they not the same as she-asses?"  But as the Jew was about to return and report this explanation, the Scribe slew him with his staff (i., p. 58).  Hence it appears that this tenet is a religious secret whose violation merits death.  When a Jew looks upon the grave of a brother Jew, he must say:  "Blessed is He who hath created us by law, who has promised to raise us again by law, and who knoweth our number; blessed is He who revives the dead."  But if the tomb be that of a Gentile, he must say:  "Shame upon thy mother, cursed be she that bare thee; for the end of the heathen shall be dry and desolate as the soil of the desert" (p. 58).... If a Jew finds an object lost, we will say, by a Muslim, he must not restore it, even though he knew the proprietor.  Also, if a Gentile make any mistake in accounting with the Jew, or leave property in his house, the latter [the Jew], when not in fear of the authorities, must rob him.  At all times, in fact, the Jew should spoil [ruin] the Gentile as much as possible.  If one Jew injure [even just verbally, as in slander or libel] another, though even his personal enemy and the greatest villain in the world, especially if such injury be to the advantage of a Gentile, the Jew shall surely die (chap. 388 of the Khalehah Orah Haim Meshat, one of the most accredited parts of the Oral law).  All those present are bound to put the denouncer to death before he can do the deed; and if he has [already] done it, they must remove him from this world, every Israelite in the place contributing to pay the assassin.  The oath of a Gentile or  a Samaritan cannot be taken in evidence against a Jew.  If a dispute occurs between to Israelites, they must go before their own judge... (The system of the Beth-din [house of judgement] is kept up even in the British Islands.  The Chief Rabbi is called Rab or Ab Beth-din, and he nominates his two Dayanim, or associates.  Its jurisdiction is civil, social, and religious; but its powers extend only to levying fines and to excommunicating recusants.  In Damascus the jurisdiction is much more extended.  The building is in the street of the Scribe called by courtesy "Rabbi Yakub Perez" [Street], and half the intrigues in the city are here hatched.  The well-known Khagal of the Russian Jews is a similar institution, not recognized by the Government, but exerting immense and injurious power over the people.)... It is sinful to have recourse to foreign tribunals, and all the decisions of the latter, when adverse to Jews, must be quashed.  Although the heathen court pass sentence according to Hebrew Law, the plaintiff or denouncer becomes impious, sacrilegious, and religiously excommunicated, whilst the Rabbi is bound to make him lose his cause by every possible contrivance, even by suborning false witnesses against him.  And at last due punishment must be dealt out.  The latter is not a Biblical command, but it results from the commentaries on the Talmuds.  When these works were written Muhammadanism did not exist; Muslims therefore are now included amongst the Gentiles.  They are not, however, like the Christian 'idolaters'.

"... Tract Muad Katon (Little Feast, eleventh of the second order) forbids Jews to salute [acknowledge or greet] Gentiles unless in fear of them, and even then never twice.

"... R. Jacob Be-Rab, in the second part of his Jore Deah (Yurah daah), asserts that it is unlawful to draw a Gentile out of a well into which he may have descended or fallen.  He also declares that the scrupulous Jewish physician who thoroughly conforms to Talmudic Law will not attend a Gentile without honorarium [a payment given to a professional person for services for which fees are not legally or traditionally required], because this will be his sole 'reward'.  He may do so gratuitously, if he wishes to study medicine by that means; but he should usually kill such patients whilst pretending to cure them.  This, however, must be attempted only when there is no chance of detectionR. Joseph Caro of Safed, one of the most pestilent of that School, in his commentary upon the Way of Knowledge, enables the doctor to do additional harm by calling Gentile fees Kashmad, that is to say, the wages of sin -- a term applied to the price of a woman's honor; and in speaking especially of Christians, he declares that if the Jewish physician takes his fee without poisoning them it is as the gift to the wicked woman [ie the Christian patient is no better than a prostitute to the Jewish doctor].  On the other hand, should the mediciner [doctor] be unwilling to be paid, he must absolutely poison his patient.  He also forbids the doctor who has not thoroughly studied the healing art to attend to one of his own faith, lest his ignorance cause death; but he may practise amongst all others, because if he kill them it is lawful and no matter (commentary of Gittin, the sixth tract of the third order).  Others declare that the Hebrew physician must not treat a stranger even for fees; but if he fear the Gentile, and the latter know him to be a Jew, he may do so for money.  Rubbi argues the question by reference to the Gittin, in which it is related that R. Richmi bin Askhi had prepared a dose for a stranger; he explains that the drug may have been given by way of experiment, or for the purpose of study.

"Obviously such cruel and vindictive teaching as that recounted in the previous chapter must bear fruit in crime and atrocities... From the earliest ages to these modern days, and not in one place, but all the world over, the hatred of the Jew against the non-Jew has been the fiercest... In the fifth century the Hebrew colony, which, flying from Syria and Palestine after the wars of Titus and Hadrian, settled near Yathrib (Medina), was powerful enough to murder the Viceroy of the Tobbaa, or Himyarite King, and to convert to Judaism, Du-nawas (A.D. 480), one of the last of that dynasty.  He acquired the title "Lord of the Fiery Pit", by burning alive, in a trench filled with combustibles, thousands of Christians of Nejeran at the instigation of the Jews.  In later times the 'People of the Synagogue' brought upon themselves a war of extermination by insulting an Arab woman, and after the siege of Kheibar they attempted to poison Muhammad.  In A.D. 614 the Hebrews of Galilee, according to Eutychius, joining the Persian army under Chosroes II, caused a great slaughter of the Nazarenes.  When the Holy City was captured, they bought at a cheap rate those taken by the Persians, especially from the Greek monastery of Mar Saba, for the sole purpose of butchering them.  Even in Abyssinia, when the Falashas, or black proselytes, established a powerful kingdom, this quasi-Jewish race, under their King Gideon and their Queen Judith, was a scourge to all the nations around.  These are but a few instances of the many which would fill a volume.  It is absurd to suppose with the 'liberal' writers of the nineteenth century that whole colonies have been expelled... from England and France, from Germany, Spain, Portugal, and other Christian kingdoms... imprisoned in Ghettos, and subjected to tumultous and wholesale massacres... and slain like savage beasts for the mere frenzy and the ignorance of superstition, for simply diabolical barbarity, and for clipping coin or for claiming more than two shillings per week on a loan of twenty shillings.

"... And what can we expect from a system which teaches men to believe and to act as follows?  'A tradition of the Talmud says (Talmud, Book Baba Kama, Chapter Haggozel) if an Israelite and a Gentile come before thee to judgment, if thou canst absolve the Israelite according to the Jewish Law, absolve him, and say, 'This is our way of judging'.  But if thou canst absolve him by Gentile Law, absolve him, and say, 'This is your way of judging'.  But if not, then they are to come upon him with cunning frauds.  (from the Pugio Fidei; Part III, c. xxii., 22; of the learned Raymund Martin, A.D. 1284, quoted in a pamphlet, of which more presently).  R. Samuel says the error of a Gentile is also lawful.  For, behold, Samuel bought a piece of gold for four small coins, and added one more (that he might go away the sooner, and not perceive the fraud).  Chahana bought a hundred and twenty casks of wine for the price of a hundred; he said, 'My trust is in thee'.  So far the Talmud.  From these and similar passages Jews infer that they may and ought to deceive Christians and others who are not Jews.  Thus also from other passages they infer that they may and ought to kill Christians, of which the following example is found in the book of Mechilta:  Exod. xiv 7, And he took six hundred chosen chariots, and all the chariots of Egypt.  From whom did he take them?  If you say from the Egyptians, is it not said already, Exod. ix 6, And all the cattle of Egypt died?  If you say Pharoah, then there is difficulty; for it is said already, ix 3, Behold, the hand of the Lord shall be upon they cattle.  But if you say they were from the Israelites, it is said already, x 26, Our cattle shall go with us.  From whom then were they?  It is plain that they must have been from those who feared the word of the Lord.  Hence we learn that those of the servants of Pharoah who feared the word of the Lord were a stumbling-block to Israel, and hence R. Simeon ben Jochai says, 'Slay thou the best amongst the Gentiles, and of the best serpents bruise the head (this has passed into an Arab proverb [also]).  Thus far the Talmud; and by this they mean to say, that of serpents he especially is to be killed that is the greatest and best of its kind, so Christians are to be dealt with in the same way.  For killing Christians and throwing their children into pits, and even for killing them when they can do it secretly, they derive an argument from that which is said in the book Abodah Zarah, Chapter En Maamidin:  'As to Gentiles and robbers, and those that tend small cattle, they are neither to be helped out of a well nor to be thrown into it.  But heretics and informers and apostates are to be thrown in, but not to be helped out'.  The commentary of Rashi says:  'Heretics mean the priests of idols; informers mean calumniators who betray the wealth of their brethren into the hands of the Gentiles.  R. Shesheth says:  'If there be a step in the pit, let him find and excuse, and say, Lest an evil beast descend upon him.'  Rabba and R. Joseph both say:  'If there be a stone upon the mouth of the well, be is to cover it, and say, I do it that the beasts may pass over it'.  R. Nachman says:  'If there be a ladder in the well, he is to take it away, and say, I wish to get down my son from the roof'.  Thus far the Talmud.  Thy prudence, O reader, may perceive that the Talmud, which so perniciously teaches them to [senselessly, and/or based solely on greed] lie and to kill Christians, is not the law of God, but the figment of the devil.

"We can hardly be surprised, after reading such atrocious doctrines, at what history tells us concerning the Jews, their crimes, and their condemnations."

Jews often excuse their hateful behaviors by pointing the finger of accusation at the Roman Catholic church (only they usually use the more general, umbrella term, "Christians"), as if the "devil makes them do it"; but I'm not here to defend the Catholic religion, nor any other State-sanctioned one.  In my opinion, the kindest and most sane religion of all is that based simply on the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth; but this article is not about which is the best religion.  My thesis here, is that our Jewish dominated, Zionist favoring government has grossly and persistently violated all US citizens' Civil Rights -- particularly those addressing freedoms of religious belief.  It's ironic and hypocritical for modern Jews to blame Catholics or anyone else, for their own crimes.  If Catholics and other state established religions have worked in collusion with the Illuminati, a group of elitist Pagan Qabbalists, it's because they've been handed the power to do so -- by Congress.  Congress has enabled organized religions which should never have been granted tax exemptions.  In the past, kings and emperors did the same thing; it's called the establishment of religion(s), in Article One of the Bill of Rights.

Many times throughout history when Jews were expelled from countries or regarded with suspicion and fear, it was not for their religion or ethnicity alone, but for good reasons:  Jewish leaders habitually ingratiated themselves with whatever ruling nobility and royalty were then in power; and they often took on the job of "tax farming", wherein they collected monies from serfs and peasantry (the poorest of populations) for the kings and lords -- keeping for themselves as profit, the difference between that collected and that which the monarchy expected in payment.  In order to sustain their business interests, Jews often converted to the Catholic faith "officially", while practicing Judaism in secrecy (Muslims or Moors frequently did the same).  According to rabbi Potok, at some time during the Inquisitions, Spain alone had at least 300,000 Jewish 'conversos'.  Jews historically lived in finer homes and were wealthier than common Christians (who mostly worked the land or were artisans and craftsmen), and they usually refused to socialize with Christians in a friendly, brotherly manner.  As pointed out above by Richard Burton, Christians were the victims of systematically foul business practices perpetrated by Jews, sanctioned by their religion:  Talmudic Judaism.

Every time a religion receives governmental protections, it quickly becomes corrupt.  That's because doing so, is wrong, immoral.  The early Christians who were not State sanctioned, were not warmongers.  They rarely if ever persecuted anyone, not even those who mistreated them.  It was only after they'd become more and more organized, more powerful, and then made into the official religion of nations such as Rome, Spain, France, Italy, and England -- that they turned evil.  Earliest Christianity was a reaction to the corruption of Judaism.  And the earliest Protestant Reformationists were reacting to the evils of Pagan-influenced and State sanctioned Roman Catholicism.  But every time any organized, structured religion holds that much power over the masses, they eventually misuse and abuse it.

That is why our forefathers wisely wrote Freedom of Belief, and also Freedom of Speech and other related intellectual liberties, into our country's Constitution.  Like the Essenes, they didn't believe in Slavery (although unfortunately there were in Early American times as always, certain factions -- Freemasons being one of them -- unwilling to give up their dependence on free labor and enslaved minds).  Without Freedom of Belief, there can be no Freedom from discrimination nor Freedom to Pursue Happiness.  Violation of that Civil Right leads nations directly to caste or class systems of slavery or serfdom.

I remember shopping in a pharmacy near my home long ago, one that was owned by a prominent wealthy Jewish family.  I remember that even when I was the only person in that store, they never acknowledged my presence -- other than to take my money in exchange for their merchandise.  They never made eye contact, nor ever did I hear a "thank you" from them.  I didn't understand why, at the time.

If people found out who the real Israelites are, and who are the real Gentiles, their hypocrisy would be exposed to the whole world.
("Jesus was not a Jew")

Of Gypsies, Richard Francis Burton had this to say:  "I wish to place in extenso before the public the following conclusions which the study of some years has, it is hoped, justified me in drawing with regard to the relation of the Gypsies and the Jats...

"1. The mediaeval Gypsies of Europe were the last wave of Aryan emigration that flowed westward during the early fifteenth century; and this wave was possibly preceded by more than one similar exodus.

"2. The mediaeval Gypsies show family resemblances, physical and moral, ethnological and linguistic, with the modern Jats, a highly important race, which extends from the mouth of the Indus to the head of the great Valley, thence ramifying over Turkistan and far North.

"3. There are solid reasons for believing the Jats and the Jin-tchi of Tatary to be the modern representatives of the classical Getae and the Goths of later days.

"4. The language of both tribes (Jat and Gypsy) is of Indo-Persian type, the Indian ingredient not being so much decomposed as in the modern varieties of Prakrit.  An absolute isolation of speech, especial reasons for secrecy, and the fact of being oral and never written have preserved its purity among the Gypsies; while the Jats, in close contact with alien tongues, have made those secular linguistic changes which are familiar even to English and French.

"5. The most ancient name of the race is Chinganeh, a term still used in Persia and Turkey, and necessarily corrupted by the Arabs, who have no ch, to Jinganeh.

"6. Concerning the origin of the Gypsy article (o - os, a - as, etc.), which is unknown to both Sanskrit and Prakrit, the suit is still pending.  Possibly it is original and peculiar to the dialect; more probably it is an European and especially a Greek innovation.  Briefly, until we have grammatical and vocabularian sketches of the Central Asian and the Turkoman-Gypsy tongues, we are not in a position to draw conclusions."

Many Bible scholars believe, perhaps correctly, that Gypsies were among the multitudes of slaves who had escaped Egypt with the Egyptian Israelites.  But although some believe they entered India for a time and then turned around and continued their wanderings elsewhere,  one linguist "Captain Newbold" assured Mr. Burton that the Gypsies in fact originated in India:  "His studies gained breadth by noting the manners and habits of a singular wandering tribe called the Jats, whose remarkable physical appearance reminded him strongly of the Gypsies of Egypt and Syria.  He saw a tribe living in tents and rude movable huts in the wood of Balut, near Jujah, between Karachi and the Indus.  Hence he drew the following conclusions:  'Since my visit to the banks of the Indus, I am more than ever convinced that from the borders of this classic river originally migrated the horde of Gypsies that are scattered over Europe, Asia, and the northern confines of Africa.  The dialects spoken by the numerous tribes which swarm upon the territories adjacent to the Indus, from the sea to the snowy mountains of Himalaya and Tatary, have, with those spoken by the Gypsies, a certain family resemblance, which, like their physical features, cannot be mistaken.  I find it impossible to place my hand on any particular tribe, and say, "This is the parent stock of the Gypsies", but as far as my researches have gone, I am rather inclined to think that this singular race derives its origin, not from one alone, but from several tribes that constitute the family of mankind dwelling on, or adjacent to, the banks of the Indus.'

"Captain Newbold's studies in Egypt, where he was assisted by the Shaykhs of the Roma, complete those of Von Kremer, and prove that the latter had chiefly noticed the Ghawazi and Ghagar families.  The former would divide the vagrants into two -- the Helebris and their wives, the Fehemis (wise women), who practise palmistry and divination, and look down with supreme contempt upon their distant kinsmen the Ghagar or Ghajar, whose better halves are musicians and rope-dancers...

"The monkey-leaders so numerous in Cairo, especially about the Ezbekijjeh quarter [existing prior to 1877], the Kuraydati, so called from Kird, an ape, also belong to the Gypsy tribes; and these mostly supply the Bahlawan, gymnasts or strong-men, athletes, and especially wrestlers, who frequent fairs and festivals.  During the 'Id ed Dahijjeh they swarm in the capital.

"All these subdivisions speak the Rothwelsch, or 'Thieves' Latin', which they call El Sim.  It explains the idea prevailing in the middle of the last century; namely that the Gypsy language was an invented tongue [like Yiddish]; a 'Germania', as the Spaniards say; a conventional jargon; a jail-bird's speech, varying with every horde.  The origin and full import of the term Sim are undetermined; but it is understood to mean something hidden or secret, and it is applied to the impure and gilt 'gold-wires' imported from Austria...

"The following vocabulary was compiled by Von Kremer at Cairo, where he persuaded many of the Ghagar to frequent the Consulate, especially Muhammad Merwan, who pompously styled himself 'Shaykh of all the Snake-charmers of Egypt'..."

Speaking of "El Islam":  "History is silent upon that most interesting subject, the early connexion of India and Egypt.  There are, however, still traces of its existence through Arabia... Throughout Oman and Eastern Arabia there are traces to the present day of castish prejudice.  No Kabili, or man of noble tribe, however poor, will become a Haddad (blacksmith), a Shammar (shoemaker, in Hindustani Chamar), a Dabbagh (tanner), and a Nayyal (dyer).  The Hindus of Maskat have an Avatar.  Every Pandit knows that Shiva and his wife, under the names of Kapot-Eshwara and Kapot-Eshwari, visited Mecca, and were there worshipped under the form of male and female pigeons.  This notes a direct communication along the coast of the Shepherd Kings.  Again, it is possible that in ages now forgotten the AEthiopians may have received from the Hindus their arts, sciences, and civilization, which would naturally float northwards with the Nile...

"From Egypt these dogmas passed over to Greece, from Greece to the Rasenian people of ancient Etruria.  This diffusion, proved by the similarity of their belief, is supported by old tradition.  Herodotus explains the fable of the black pigeon that fled to Dodona, and there established the oracle on the ground that it was founded by a female captive from the Thebaid.  The manifest resemblance of the rites and ceremonies, the processions and mysteries, together with the historic fact that the greatest minds in Greece had studied with the priest philosophers of Helispotes and Memphis, are the main points of circumstantial evidence whence rose Warburton's luminous theory that the knowledge of the 'Secret One' was preserved by the esoteric, but concealed for fear of the profane.  He was an atheist who believed in a Single Deity because he thus degraded and dishonoured the vulgar gods; and the ancients, most pious men, solemnly tore to pieces all guilty of similar impiety.  The Arcana, however, were sacred; under their shadow any dogma might flourish.

"Some ethnologists have wondered at the remarkable coincidences between the Etruscan cosmogony and that of Moses.  The marvel is easily explained.  Both systems were borrowed from the Egyptians 'skilled in ancient learning' (Apuleius).  [Note: Chaim Potok's History of the Jews also recognizes the rather obvious influence of a formal Egyptian education, on Moses.  He also hints that Moses was further influenced by Pharoah Akhenaten, King Tut's father or grandfather, a Sun-worshipping type of monotheist.]...

"It is to be presumed that Egypt advanced a step beyond India and Persia, otherwise so many of her dogmas would not have been incorporated with the Mosaic Code.  Doubtless Egyptian priestly seers made their Demiurgos not a mere being of the intellect, but a dominant idea in religious theory, whilst the grovelling Fetissism of the people received from them a mystic and abstruse interpretation.  But herein lay their fatal error.  The priests were not only ministers of religion, they were the repositories of every branch of useful knowledge, from medicine to philosophy.  The king was by law a priest.  If a member of the second or military caste was raised to the throne, he was at once initiated; for the 'sons of God', as the sovereigns were called, could belong to none but the holy order.  The learned respected and revered as types and symbols what the vulgar worshipped and adored with heart and soul.  But they kept to themselves the benefits of their reason, and invented mysteries and gnostic ceremonies -- the purple robe of religion -- to veil that Holy Truth the contemplation of whose unadorned charms belongs to mankind.  They left their fellow-creatures, 'the most religious of men', utterly ignorant of divine knowledge, the abject worshippers of the Nile and the desert, of the ichneumon and the cat.  True they secured to a caste the knowledge which is power amongst semi-civilized races.  But an ecclesiastical order, even in the most extensive hierarchies, is only the fraction of a people:  they divided therefore their brother-men into priests and slaves...

"Moses, whose mighty mind drew from obscurity Theism, or a belief in the One God, to become the corner-stone of the creed, not of a few intitiated sages and esoteric students, but of a whole people -- who shared out to mankind their birthright, a knowledge of divine truth -- fully understood the fatal error of his preceptors, the priestly sages of Egypt.  His history, elaborately dressed in the garb of fable by after-ages, appears to be this.  Circumstances of an accidental nature drove him from the banks of the Nile into the eastern deserts.  Whilst feeding the flocks of his Bedawin father-in-law amid the awful scenery and the silent, solemn wolds of Shur, he nerved his mind to the patriotic task, the gigantic scheme of converting into a great nation and a Chosen People a mere handful of degraded slaves... His powers and energies concentrated by solitude... he returned to Egypt for the purpose of carrying into execution his stupendous scheme.

"But Moses found it impossible, with no stronger hold upon his people than certain obsolete tenets almost forgotten by the unworthy descendants of patriarchal ancestors, in the atmosphere of superstition around him and under the baneful shadow of a hostile and priestly rule, to elevate to the dignity of manhood the spirits of an enthralled, despised, and therefore degraded race.  What better proof of their degeneracy than their demanding to know the name of a God?

"This is the spiritual state of the Indian Pariah, who has his idols, but no idea of an Almighty Godhead, and who deems his dead deities inferior in dignity to a live Brahman [priest].  What more indicative of their mental subjection to the superstitions of Egypt than their imaging the One Supreme by a calf or a young bull, the emblem of Priapus [Phallus] all over the ancient world?  They were equally inferior in physical force [militarily]...

"From this state of degradation [slave bondage within a Pagan nation] the thousands of of Israel must be raised -- must return to the condition of their ancestors the bold free chiefs of the Bedawin.  They must therefore depart from Egypt, and must prepare themselves, morally as well as physically by the discipline of the vast and terrible wilderness, to enter as conquerors the holy Promised Land... According to Ibn Khaldun, the Hebrews, debased by slavery, were unable to oppose the Philistines or Arabs of Canaan until the old generation had died off and a new one had grown up in the hardy life of the wilderness.

"The great Lawgiver [Moses]... master of the learning of Egypt, displayed in effecting the deliverance of his compatriots a work of itself wonderful... which... has caused him to stand forth in the eyes of later ages a giant amongst his kind... To the present day the Arabs of Sinai show traces of gigantic feet and indentations made by a rod which must have been taller than a mast.  The monuments of Egypt, so full of minute information, allude neither to Moses nor to the Exodus.  [According to Potok, the Egyptians preferred to record only more positive, happy historical events, and may have been embarrassed by the loss of Moses with so many of their slaves.]...

"In one main point the Lawgiver miscalculated his powers.  He had proposed making of his Hebrew followers a race of pure Theists, a kingdom of priests, a holy nation, reverencing nothing but the One Supreme, worshipping him without medium or mediator, and therefore independent of temples and sacerdotal castes and the long list of ceremonies and sacred paraphernalia by which hierarchies strengthen and perpetuate their sway.  But the Hebrew mind was thoroughly unfitted to receive pure truth... Deeply imbued with the tenacious superstitions of the Nile, the stiff-necked race had become irritable rather than strong under the painful training of the desert, they longed and begged for a return to slavery, and none had eyes to look steadfastly upon the unveiled light of Revelation emanating from their leader and lawgiver.

"Finding, after his return from temporary seclusion and retirement, his chosen people worshipping a molten calf, the god Apis, and playing -- in other words, a scene of Egyptian debauchery -- Moses broke in wrath the first Tables of the law.  These consisted simply of the Ten Commandments, a forbiddal to make gods of gold and silver, easy directions for building an earthen altar of sacrifice, and a brief civil and criminal code embodied in three chapters.  After another term of forty days and nights... Moses returned with a code better fitted to the sickly and diseased condition of the Hebrew soul.  Of this the proportion of the ritual to the moral precepts is as ten to two.  It is a priestly system, a faith of feasts and sacrifices, of holy days and ceremonies purposely assimilated to those idolatries of Egypt with which the minds of the people were familiar but secured to the worship of Jehovah their God.  The Lawgiver no longer disdained to borrow from symbolic religion, especially in the ceremonial worship, which at first he appears to have avoided.  The ark and the tabernacle were old types amongst the Egyptians, memorials of their Northern migration.  The Urim and Thummin (Ra and Thenei) were the Sun and personified Justice -- Light and Truth.  The Elohim were Kneph and Pthah, the presiding spirit and the creative intellect of the Supreme.  The Spirit of God that moved upon the face of the waters is again the Deity of Kneph.  The silence with which Jehovah was to be adored appears to be an idea borrowed from Amun Ra, the Unutterable Word, similar to the Hindu 'Aum', which never must be spoken of man.  The Tree of Life, whose fruit made gods of those who tasted it, was a mere symbol, long before the day of Moses incorporated in the Indian and Egyptian mythologies.  It survived in the Christian's early belief, and has even left its traces in the Tuba or Paradisiacal tree of El Islam...

"The creation of man, which we take figuratively, referring divine resemblance to the soul, to righteousness, and to true holiness, the Hebrews believed in literally and physically.  As the Lord formed man in his own image, so man in return anthropomorphized the Deity.  Theirs was a personal God with mortal shape and human passions... who... loved the Hebrews for no merit of their own, but for the sake of their ancestors.  The 'angry God' and the 'jealous God of Moses' stand for the orthodox opinion of even the modern Jews...

"The Jehovah of Moses, moreover, was in other points than personality an imperfect conception.  The Deity, it is true, was drawn forth from the thick veil of mystery with which the learned of India and Egypt had invested in him.  His existence was proclaimed not to caste or a class; it was published to a whole people.  Still, he was the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob, not the God of Eternity -- the God of all men.  A local deity, his cult and knowledge were confined to one people, to a mere fraction of the human kind.  Moses, then, was essentially a benefactor to the Hebrews, but he was not a benefactor to [M]an[kind]...

[In fact now, Moses remains the benefactor of a people who are essentially imposters, pretenders to the throne.  They're not even Hebrews, really, but Arabs, Turks, Gypsies, etc.  They're mostly Ashkenazim, Khazars, now.]

"Presently a new Reformer appeared upon the worldly stage.  The Hebrew code had long before his day begun to decline... Its decay was hastened by political convulsions.  The captivity of the Jews had supplied them with a multitude of new and strange articles of belief derived from their Pagan masters.  Hence arose heresies and schisms...

"The Sadducees, adhering to the letter, rejected the spirit of the Books of Moses.  Pharisaid superstition founded upon tradition... was fast undermining the temple of Judaism.  Idolatry had perished by slow degrees out of the land; but the contrary extreme, bibliolatry, to use a modern word, sown upon the ground of priestly pride and castish prejudice, had spread rankly over the world of Judaism.  To clear away this poison growth, to reform the people of Israel, Jesus of Nazareth began his ministry.

"A man of humble fortune, but of proud birth, the Founder of Christianity preached a creed in conformity with his circumstances.  His tenets were the Essene, the third sect of philosophizing Jews.  'While the Pharisees were heaping traditions upon the original structure of the Mosaic system, and the Sadducees were rigidly preserving and adhering to the simplicity of that structure, the Essene gave their whole minde to the ascertainment and realization of its moral import'.  They were thus the Sufis, the Spiritualists, and the Gnostics of Judaism.  They abounded most at Alexandria, then the grand centre where the Greek and the Roman, the Indian and the Persian, met the Arab and the Egyptian.  A species of anchorite philosophers, they called themselves physicians of souls and bodies; they lived in voluntary poverty, rigid chastity, and implicit obedience to the civil power; they were purists in language, non-resistants, and haters of political action...

[They kept religion separate from government.]

"Such tenets, publicly announced as a voice from heaven, were of course offensive to the ruling factions at Jerusalem.  The people also that flocked to the preaching of the new Prophet were disappointed by his proclaiming to them a spiritual kingdom not the heritage of wealth, splendour, and glory, so distinctly promised to them by the seers of former generations.  They were but poorly put off with a type or symbol.  A reformer is rarely popular, and reform is a dangerous work among a poeple so hasty and headstrong as the Jews.  But Christ's teaching was not for the Jews only; he was preparing to spread abroad amongst mankind a knowledge of the One Supreme, when, falling a victim to priestly wiles, the Prophet of Nazareth suffered an ignominious death.  But he had given an impetus to the progress of mankind by sytematizing a relgion of the highest moral loveliness, showing what an imperfect race can and may become; and by the labour of a devoted life he had instituted a college of successors who after him might preach the glad tidings to all the nations of the earth.

"The Prophet of Nazareth had declared his mission to be for the purpose of establishing and confirming the Law of Moses.  As it first appeared, Christianity was rather strong in the weakness around it than strong in its own strength.  It was a system for anchorites and ascetics.  The reformed faith abounded also in a matter usually consigned in the East to bards and mystics; namely, principles of almost superhuman beauty often couched in highly poetical language, principles not the creation of one mind, but the current coinage of philanthropy from time immemorial.  Islam all over the East has left its principles as a heritage to poets, and right well have they performed their duty to mankind.  From the literature of the Hindus and Persians, the Egyptians and the Arabs, it would be easy to collect a code of morality and a law of benevolence as pure and amiable as ever entered the heart of man.  The whole practice of the Sufi consists in seeking the Divinity, not as the 'popular prudential and mercenary devotee', but from frevency of love to God and [M]an[kind].  He 'proclaims the invisible truth above the visible comfort', his entire resignation can face the horrors of eternal death inflicted by divine Will; 'he has something higher even than everlasting gain'.

"Eventually, however, this almost supernatural morality, incorporated with a creed to the detriment of its practical tendency; this substitution of love for justice, of mercy for retribution, of forgiveness for punishment; this purely spiritual system, that first neglected all the most necessary details of ablution, dietetics, and even formulae and positions of prayer, could never endure in the sensuous and passionate populations of the East..."

[Note:  I don't believe like Mr. Burton and some other writers, that "Love" and "Justice" are mutually exclusive.  You can't have "Love" without "Justice"; the two go hand in hand.  What isn't loving, however, is the type of justice which follows the "eye for an eye" creed.  Justice may be meted out in ways that are loving, rational and sane, for both criminals and victims, if the focus is kept on protection of victims and not solely on punishment.  Punishment and discipline should never be vindictive, or cause unnecessary pain or suffering.  For example, a criminal ought never to be tortured or rendered any sort of harsh treatment other than sentences of imprisonment, fines or execution.  Because, the very acts of torture or "cruel and unusual" punishments are themselves criminal behaviors.  It is rank hypocrisy to do so.  Engaging in sadistic behaviors or violence, short of self defense or the defense of victims, is damaging to the psyche, both of administrators and witnesses to such evil treatment.]
Erich Fromm wrote the best and most objective book I've ever read (apart from Jesus' teachings) on the subject of love.
(Like me and a few other Americans, certain respectable foreign countries view torture as a crime against Humanity.)

So pure Christianity eventually met the same fate as Mosaic Law:  it became corrupted with Paganism and politics.  And both Mosaic Law and Talmudic Judaism, like Islam, never quite made it completely out of Paganism and politics, to begin with.  What we have in America now, is a government which has meddled in the religious affairs of the citizenry for so long now, establishing churches, synagogues, and mosques, among other types of worship -- that they've nearly succeeded in creating their own World religion, a type of Pantheism.  And of course, they see themselves as the high priests, the 'authorities'.

In Pagan Hindu India, the Brahmans (Aryans) were the highest, ruling caste; also the priestly one.  Most Hindus still recognize their caste system for religious purposes, but the British Empire steered them somewhat toward a more democratic form of government.  Supposedly, they now have separation of religion from government.  In Mother India, c1927 by Katherine Mayo, I learned what it was like for Dravidians, the lowest caste -- actually a non-caste, they were called the "Untouchables".  Although they were required to do all of the dirtiest and vilest work (including midwifery, as all Hindus viewed childbirth as 'unclean'), they were never paid well enough to live in a dignified manner, and were treated as lower than animals.

"With one of these low-caste men become rich, respected and politically powerful, I sat in private conference, in the city of Madras.  A little, vivacious person he was, full of heat and free of tongue.  'Will you draw me your picture of the Brahman?' I asked.  He answered -- and these are his actual words, written down at the moment:

"'Once upon a time, when all men lived according to their choice, the Brahman was the only fellow who applied himself to learning.  Then, having become learned, and being by nature subtle-minded, he secretly laid hold upon the sacred books, and secretly wrote into those books false texts that declared him, the Brahman, to be lord over all the people.  Ages passed.  And gradually, because the Brahman only could read and because he gave out his false texts that forbade learning to others, the people grew to believe him the Earthly God he called himself and to obey him accordingly.  So in all Hindu India he ruled the spirit of man, and none dared to dispute him, not till England came with schools for all.

"'Now, here in this Province, Madras, we fight the Brahman.  But still he is strong, because the might of thousands of years breaks slowly, and he is as shrewd as a host of demons.  He owns the press, he sways the bench, he holds eighty per cent of the public offices, and he terrorizes the people, especially the women.  For we are all superstitious and mostly illiterate.  The 'Earthly God' has seen to that.  Also, he hates the British, because they keep him from strangling us.  He makes much 'patriotic' outcry, demanding that the British go.  And we -- we know that if they go now, before we have had time to steady ourselves, he will strangle us again and India will be what it used to be, a cruel despotism wielded by fat priests against a mass of slaves, because our imaginations are not yet free of him.  Listen:

"'Each Hindu in India pays to the Brahman many times more than he pays to the State.  From the day of his birth to the day of his death, a man must be feeding the Earthly God.  When a child is born, the Brahman must be paid; otherwise, the child will not prosper.  Sixteen days afterward, to be cleansed of 'birth pollution', the Brahman must be paid [again].  A little later, the child must be named; and the Brahman [again] must be paid.  In the third month, the baby's hair must be clipped; and the Brahman must be paid.  In the sixth month, we begin to feed the child solids; and the Brahman must be paid.  When the child begins to walk, the Brahman must be paid.  At the completion of the first year comes the birthday ceremony and the Brahman must be paid.  At the end of the seventh year the boy's education begins and the Brahman must be paid well.  In well-to-do families he performs the ceremony by guiding golden writing-sticks placed in the boy's hand; and the sticks also go to the Brahman.

"'When a girl reaches her first birthday, her seventh, or her ninth, or when a boy is one and a half, or two years old, or anywhere up to sixteen, comes the betrothal, and big pay to the Brahman.  Then, when puberty comes, or earlier, if the marriage is consummated earlier, rich pay to the Brahman.  At an eclipse, the Brahman must be paid heavily.  And so it goes on.  When a man dies, the corpse can be removed only after receiving the blessing of the Brahman, for which he is paid.  At the cremation, again a lot of money must be paid to many Brahmans.  After cremation, every month for a year, the dead man's son must hold a feast for Brahmans -- as great a feast as he can -- and give them clothes, ornaments, food and whatever would be dear to the dead.  For whatever a Brahman eats, drinks or uses is enjoyed by the dead.  Thereafter, once a year, during the son's life, he must repeat this observance.

"'All such ceremonies and many more the Brahman calls his 'vested rights', made so by religious law.  Whoever neglects them goes to eternal damnation.  During the performance of each rite we must wash the Brahman's feet with water and then we must drink some of that water from the palm of our hand.  The Brahman is indolent, produces nothing, and takes to no calling but that of lawyer or government official.  In this Province he numbers one and a half million and the rest of us over forty-one millions, feed him.

"'Now do you understand that, until we others are able to hold our own in India, we prefer a distant King beyond the sea, who gives us peace, justice, something back for our money and a chance to become free men, to a million and a half masters, here, who eat us up, yet say our very touch would pollute them?'"

The Cherokee once also had a priestly clan or caste, who abused their privileges by raping their women, among other things.  The Cherokee however, took care of the problem themselves, without any outside help.  Nevertheless, this illustrates the problem of combining religion with government.  It also brings to mind the scripture, "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge...(Hosea 4:6)"  Notice how the lower castes trusted the Brahmans, yet the Brahmans betrayed and took advantage of that trust?  Also notice the part played by superstition, in thousands of years of authoritative, totalitarian oppression amounting to slavery.

Many people have bought the lies, that we must join gangs or other various types of groups, in order to be "strong", in order to "survive".  Then, we must fight all 'Others' who are not like us, in order to maintain our "superior" status.  Hence we sacrifice our Selves, our individuality, to group dynamics.  We become zombies, clones, automatons, "yes" -men and -women... machines.  We become very agreeable to the "authorities", yet soul-less and mindless to some extents.  We pay our dues and taxes, support our clubs, churches and the government.  We do the work of two, maybe sometimes even three people, for our employers.  Many people have lost the ability to feel any emotion at all -- even happiness; although they have learned how to go through the motions, perform, and properly act in all the 'appropriate' manners.  Many others have died young, either in battle or accidently, in our very fast-paced, super competitive society.

Some people seek group affiliation because they need leadership:  they are confused and unable to think logically enough to figure things out for themselves.  Things like, 'the meaning of life', etc..  Throughout my life, I've tried many times to do as popular mainstream psychiatry and sociology advises, suggesting what we must do in order to be "Human":  to 'fit in' to some group or another (preferably one of the 'classier' types of clique).

Yet none of the cliques in my neighborhood really seemed all that 'classy' to me (except superficially).  And whenever I managed to do so anyway, I usually ended up losing materially or physically and sacrificing part of my own Self, my psyche, my soul.  I was fairly often led into unsafe (even dangerous), unhealthy, and/or unhappy circumstances -- by people in whom I'd placed my trust:  friends, doctors, lovers, bureaucrats...  My dear mother always implied that if I'd only been "nicer", nothing bad would ever have happened to me.  I ought to be even more agreeable, she said.  Then everything would work out well for me, because people only abuse, deceive or mistreat you, if you are not "nice".  She believes that, and also believes that it's working for her...  What she didn't understand, was that I couldn't have been any "nicer" -- nor could anyone.

However, the more intelligent a person is, the more need they have for freedom, autonomy and individuality.  And I've always admired the American Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights, which asserts that every US citizen is an Individual with inalienable, divine, natural Human Rights.  I could never understand why one should have to give that up, in order to find a semblance of shelter, safety, or love.  It never made sense to me, and still doesn't.
First of all, why does the government spend so much taxpayer money on fancy symbolic artwork to decorate government buildings and municipalities?  Second, if the Denver airport murals are so harmless and benign, then why did they paint over some of them after people complained enough about it?  Such behavior reveals consciousness of guilt on their part.  It is illegal for our government to spend taxpayer money on propaganda (including artwork) which only serves to promote a religion -- in this case, a secret society.

A secret society which appears to be driven and motivated by greed and the hunger for world domination.

I like many of Everett Dean Martin's ideas, in his book, Liberty (c1930):  "Freedom is always relative; and that society will be relatively most free in which people have best learned the lesson of minding their own business.  The law may specifically define what our several rights and proper occupations are, but behind the law there must be a certain disposition in the people.  If liberty is to exist, the individual must be zealous for the freedom of others; he must be willing that people differ from him.  He must not be too easily shocked or scandalized when tastes differ.  He must hold his own convictions rather tentatively, and remember that he may be wrong.  Especially must he be modest about beliefs which assign duties and obligations to [other] men, for to demand assent to such convictions is often to claim ownership of one's neighbors.  No meddlesome people can long remain free...

"The crowd mind is essentially a conformist mind; and this is so even when the crowd is openly indulging itself in antisocial behavior.  Crowds seldom interpret their motives correctly.  Each crowd fabricates a system of obsessive ideas which serves to disguise its real motive, to disarm opposition, to justify its behavior in the minds of its members and hold them together in "the movement".  The ideas of the crowd become stereotyped, standardized.  Having made up its mind, it refuses to listen to the expression of dissenting opinion.  Objectors are thrown out, howled down, thrust aside, trampled.  As the crowd thinks and acts in a pseudo-social environment created by its own rationalization, it can sustain its purpose only by remaining deaf to the voice of conflicting reason.  Dissent on the part of its members is 'disloyalty', 'treachery'.  Dissent of those outside the crowd, or any criticism of its noble experiments, is devilish enmity of righteousness and truth.  Every crowd, if it has the power, will resort to censorship and will ruthlessly destroy those who resist it.  It wants freedom of speech only to spread its own propaganda, meanwhile making strenuous efforts to prevent contrary propagandas from getting a hearing.  In this respect, all crowds behave in very much the same manner -- rival political factions, super-patriots, prohibitionists, moral crusaders, radicals, "boosters", fascists, fundamentalists, bolshevists, being all equally illiberal.

"The wonder is that there is any liberty at all.  We owe what we have of it largely to the mutual jealousy and suspicion of rival crowds, which fortunately impel them to pull one another down, each acting to check the despotism of the rest.  We are even more indebted to those truly liberal-minded individuals in all ages whose wisdom and example have taught humanity such tolerance as it knows in its saner moments.  The true liberal confronted by the herd and the pack has always faced a disadvantage and a task.  He is at a disadvantage in that his very tolerance leads him to champion freedom of speech for those who disagree with him, including those who would use such freedom to make illiberal propaganda.  His task has again and again been the same:  to keep the lights of civilization burning.  It is important to remember that Western civilization has advanced most rapidly in those brief periods of relative tolerance and personal liberty, the Periclean Age, the Renaissance, the Eighteenth Century, the era of the progress of science in the Nineteenth Century.  These have been the times when the authority of the crowd over thought was weakened, and the influence of unique individuals was greatest.  And these are the times which have made the history of liberty...

"Tolerance of the freedom of speech is the real test of a people's love of liberty.  It is the measure of this tolerance, rather than the statues of emancipators in the public square, which shows whether or not a people is free.  Freedom of speech is, I believe, the liberty on which all other liberties depend.  No other liberty, even the little we now enjoy, has been so hard to gain.  No exercise of freedom is so essential to the advance of civilization, and none is at the same time more dangerous.  No other recognized liberty is so repeatedly subject to attack, and none may so easily be lost.  The exercise of this right may incite men to riot, and the attempt to suppress free speech has been the common cause of persecution.  Enemies of freedom and cultural advance always strike first at freedom of speech because in doing so they not only hope to shoot liberty through the heart, but they can easily find plausibilities to justify such an assault on freedom.  No form of liberty is so commonly abused...

[I would only add to his eloquent speech, that without sound beliefs and/or ideas, we have no need to speak freely.  Without our own rational and independent thoughts, our words become like common trollish babble or repetitive parroting.  If everyone conforms to the same rigidly structured, pre-ordained belief system(s), then there is no need for debate.  And without Freedom of Religion, that is where we always wind up:  in either chaotic, confused anarchy or in mind-numbing, spirit crushing bondage.  Governments have historically used religion to squelch, to quash, Free Speech.  In turn, they've used the violation of Free Speech in order to promote their own state approved, mentally enslaving religions.

[Thus I now take poetic license in order to rephrase Mr. Martin's statement:  "Enemies of (religious) freedom and cultural advance always strike first at freedom of speech... (and conversely) Enemies of (Free Speech) always strike first at freedom of (religion).  Because, the two go hand-in-hand."]

"In a recent book on propaganda, one of the most skillful manipulators of public opinion in America makes some interesting disclosures of the nature and practice of this very lucrative art.  It would seem that the technique of propaganda is now perfected so that an "invisible government" may be placed at the disposal of any minority which is financially able to employ it.  One never knows now when one is being used by unknown persons for ends that remain undisclosed.  We are told that very often when we think we are acting most freely, our choices are in fact determined by skillful men operating behind the scenes.  It is only now that we are becoming aware of the enormity and devastating results of the falsehoods put out by the governments of practically all the leading nations during the World War [I].  The weapon of falsehood, which has been likened to poison gas, was used by governments not only against the enemy, but deliberately to poison the atmosphere of homelands with undying hatreds and false ideas of the issues at stake.  Many of us have sought to learn some lesson from the behavior of men during that war which might work to the advantage of civilization.  But our author says that "the knowing ones" learned from it, for special interests, the tricks of utilizing a war psychology in times of peace.  The minds of men may now be regimented as effectively as the bodies of soldiers in an army.  No means of communication or form of human association may escape the injection of some extraneous and ulterior purpose.  For it is said that every approach to social intercourse [communication] may be made an avenue of propaganda.  The propagandist has learned the method of using, as did governments in wartime, the cliches and prejudices of the crowd in order to sell his wares or enhance the special interests of his clients.

"Propaganda becomes the weapon of the group struggle for power, in which every effort is made to prevent the contest from becoming a fair fight...

"I recently heard a group of typical prosperous Americans discussing the present condition of their country.  To most of them it seemed to be a matter beyond dispute that any restriction of personal liberty which would increase the industrial productivity of the country by ten percent would be wholly justified.  They argued that such increased efficiency would give domestic industry an advantage in competition with other nations.  On this principle, industrialism would reduce the modern world to complete and abject slavery.  We might well pause and question whether the attempt to secure enforced efficiency is not self-defeating.  For it is doubtful, in the end, if industrial slaves would be as efficient or show as much initiative as free men.  But somehow the erroneous idea seems to be generally and uncritically accepted that individual liberty has no proper place in a machine age."

In other words, most wealthy people are willing to sell their freedom for money.  Yes I agree, that's a self-defeating attitude.  Because, why have wealth for any reason other than to afford oneself more freedom?  I'm sure their souls are for sale, too.  Furthermore, if we (every Individual) were all truly free, we would not need to strive for excessive material gain -- and Earth's resources would be spared.
By the way, our entire economic system is nothing more than a social, religious construct:  it's built entirely from the very irrational, unsound, and self-serving ideas and beliefs of a secretive, deceptive minority (who are seeking to gain majority status, because they hope that will help their cause).  It is the religious construct of an extremely superstitious, faithless and hedonistic secret society (Freemasonry, the Illuminati) who perform such ridiculous rites as sorcery and witchcraft, among other things (street theatre, dramas, orgies, bacchanals, circumcisions, purdahs...).  It is sometimes appropriately labelled, "voo-doo economics".

But whether it is achieved by minority or majority rule is irrelevant anyway, because it's an inhumane, destructive and wasteful economic system.  And it violates our Civil Rights, bottom line.

Some "Illuminati" webpages:
(The Order of Bavarian Illuminati.)
(European Illuminati.)
(An interesting history of Freemasonry by the Masons themselves, found when I googled 'Huguenot' on their own site above.)
(Chat Room for the "Enlightened")
(The above three links seem legit.)
(Very informative, seems legit.)
(... the role of Catholic Jews in history, genealogy and legends...)
("apostate wordpress blogspot", by invitation only)
(Legit, and reveals the delusional nature of their thinking.  Could be very deceptive, like most of them, even the legit ones -- that is, especially the legit ones.  Talks a lot about Eugenics.  Jam-packed with information, much of it anti-Christ / anti-Christian.)
(The one I was looking for... seems legit.)
(An article about Islamic Freemasons... Al Qaeda doesn't like them.)
(All about Freemasonry in Islam.)
("He's saying that "they" (the Dragons) have a Mad Cow (BSE) or Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease resistance gene."  That gene is found only in populations which have a long history of cannibalism; it's like resistance to malaria or other diseases in other populations, your ancestors must have been exposed to the disease, in order for your DNA to adjust to it.  Likewise, predisposition to diabetes is found in populations which have experienced famines or starvation in their pasts.)
(Interesting discussion.)
("I hate to sound like a Christian but this is where the trail seems to be leading...")
(The Neanderthal mystery.)
(The Pope's forum, where they discuss the Humanity of Neanderthals... the Pope has also stated that he would baptize Extra-terrestrial Aliens into the church, lol.)
(Practically every top American government official has blue or green eyes, and a very sloped forehead with extremely prominent brow ridges.)
Opinions, criticisms about Rick Potvin, for a more balanced view of where he's coming from.  He strikes me as probably being one of the Illuminati, quite frankly.
(This guy might be a troll, but he clearly illustrates the phenome of the modern Neanderthal, associates them fairly accurately with Jews.)
(Bottom line: they either don't know, or are not telling regardless.)
("Critical progress in biomedicine attributed to macaques includes the identification of the “rhesus factor” blood groups...")
(There is greater genomic distance between male and female Human populations, generally, than between Human and Chimpanzee populations... that's an important clue, since many genes are sex-linked.)
("Does Rh neg blood link back to the Neanderthals?" -- answer: yes, it does.)
(Bestiality was long punishable with the death sentence, but now has gained near mainstream acceptance or at least, tolerance.)
("Transhumanism is a loosely defined movement that has developed gradually over the past two decades. “Transhumanism is a class of philosophies of life that seek the continuation and acceleration of the evolution of intelligent life beyond its currently human form and human limitations by means of science and technology, guided by life-promoting principles and values.” (Max More 1990)

"Transhumanism promotes an interdisciplinary approach to understanding and evaluating the opportunities for elevating the human condition and the human organism, opened up by the advancement of technology. Attention is given to both present technologies, such as biotechnology and information technology, and anticipated future technologies, such as molecular nanotechnology and artificial intelligence." -- Bestiality is serious business for some people; and I gather potentially profitable.)
("An anthropological study.")
(Interesting discussion about whether or not Jews are a distinct ethnic group who are easy to "spot".)
(One thing the Hybrids all have in common:  they're psychopaths... Some people refer to them as "lizard people", "reptilians", "snakes", "apes", "monkeys", "sharks", "predators", "beasts", etc... all very descriptive of their mentality.)

(Excellent book, highly recommended.  Although the author doesn't quite pinpoint the actual gene or genes involved in evil behavior, she manages to utilize her training as a statistician to gain a tremendous amount of insight into the problem.)


"THE RULES OF THE ILLUMINATI - An illusion it will be, so large, so vast it will escape their perception.


"1. Those who will see it will be thought of as insane.  (This is very true because understanding the illuminati not only requires someone to acknowledge the existence of the Devil but also to understand the schemes of the Devil.)

"2. We will create separate fronts to prevent them from seeing the connection between us.

"3. We will behave as if we are not connected to keep the illusion alive. Our goal will be accomplished one drop at a time so as to never bring suspicion upon ourselves. This will also prevent them from seeing the changes as they occur.

"4. We will always stand above the relative field of their experience for we know the secrets of the absolute.  (They are the most high; see the chart above)

"5. We will work together always and will remain bound by blood and secrecy. Death will come to he who speaks.  (They control Death...[via]... Satan... [but only the "first death", death of the body -- God controls the "second death", death of the soul.])

"6. We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite.

"7. We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so they will never see what is happening.

"8. We will use soft metals, ageing accelerators and sedatives in food and water, also in the air.

"9. The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many fronts, yet we will feed them more poison.  (This rule is true to its core.  Most of our foods have ingredients / chemicals that harm the mind and the body, these are the poisons they speak of.)  The poisons will be absorbed through their skin and mouths, they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems.

"10. The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear.

"11. We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones.

"12. They will see our products being used in film and will grow accustomed to them and will never know their true effect.

"13. When they give birth we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them it is for their help.  (It is confirmed that most vaccines have hidden poisons.)

"14. We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things.

"15. When their ability to learn has been affected, we will create medicine that will make them sicker and cause other diseases for which we will create yet more medicine.

"16. They will grow depressed, slow and obese, and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison.  (Medicines... prescriptions; Side-Effects.)

"17. Their minds will belong to us and they will do as we say.  If they refuse we shall find ways to implement mind-altering technology into their lives.  We will use fear as our weapon.

"18. We will establish their governments and establish opposites within.  We will own both sides.  (They own both the Republican and Democratic parties of our Government.)"
(The complete text; includes a bit about "Gentile Masonry"... "WARNING:  This document is a proven antisemitic forgery and hoax.  Abuse is strictly forbidden."  I don't know how it was "proven", but that's what they claim.)

From Protocol number four:  "The second secret requisite for the success of our government is comprised in the following:  To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another..."













1976 version (all the other King Kong posters are from 1933; the Planet of the Apes movies originally showed in 1968)

Andrew Auernheimer, aka "weev", aka "the Ugliest Troll in the World"... This photo found on his Twitter friend, "Brittnee's" page.  Strangely, after tweeting him, "I thought we were pals?" -- she mysteriously dropped off the map.
This is Auernheimer's 2012 CRUNCHIE Award

Painting by famed sci-fi artist, Frank Frazetta.

Frantisek Kupka.

Zdenek Burian.

Revelation 13:11-18

"And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.

"And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.

"And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,

"And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

"And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

"And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

"Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."

And the number 666 is not simply the "number of a man" -- it's actually symbolic for "Mankind".  But remember the Beast are imposters, anti-Christ, posing as real Human beings.  They're not:  they're Hybrids, descended from Neanderthals.  We all didn't evolve from Neanderthals, or we would all have Neanderthal DNA.  However, some beings which appear Human and are indeed part-Human -- are descended from the hybrid monsters called Homo Sapiens neanderthalensis.  There are other types of Human x Ape hybrids, of course... but most Jews, Muslims and anyone with Rhesus negative bloodtypes have definitively Neanderthal genetic inheritance.

The Neanderthal hybrid just happens to be the one type of Hybrid we are most familiar with, and have studied most intensively.  It's the one found most commonly among many European Caucasoids, "Semites" and Indo-Europeans (ie: Aryans).  Another type of Human hybrid is the Denisovan, found mostly in Asia and Indonesia.  Keep in mind though, that Hybrid genes are always recessive -- never dominant.  Meaning, they are inherited in Mendelian fashion:  randomly.  That's why you may find a few Rhesus negative bloodtypes for example (though rarely), among some Africans (usually African-Americans), Chinese or Asian (Han, Vietnamese, Thai, perhaps Korean and Japanese), and others not generally considered "Caucasoids".

Rhesus negative bloodtypes are rarely found among Native Americans, except that it's fairly common among Cherokees.  Modern Basques have the highest concentration of Rhesus negative individuals in the world today, but I question the common belief that it originated within their population.  I believe that like the Cherokees, they simply inherited it through outbreeding with Indo-European (or Eurasian), Aryan types; but as with the Jews and Muslims, their more closed, exclusive social systems served to concentrate that gene more efficiently among themselves.

"Neanderthals are classified alternatively as a subspecies of Homo sapiens (Homo sapiens neanderthalensis) or as a separate human species (Homo neanderthalensis).  Genetic evidence suggests they are closer to non-African than African anatomically modern humans, which is probably due to interbreeding between Neanderthals and the ancestors of the Eurasians.  This is thought to have occurred between 80,000 and 50,000 years ago, shortly after (or perhaps before) the proto-Eurasians emigrated from Africa, and while they were still one population.  It resulted in 1–4% of the genome of people from Eurasia having been contributed by Neanderthals."

For some reason, which I can only guess, scientists are hesitant to classify Neanderthals as a sub-species of Humans.  The reason is, it would blow massive holes in Darwin's theory of Evolution, which is basically the creed and dogma of their whole atheistic religion.

(Lists the various known Hominids.  You may take all 'scientific' dating of extinct species with grains of salt.)

(Keep in mind, the Smithsonian is quite biased -- they take orders from the Federal government, whether they like it, or not.)
("Papyrus 115 and Ephraemi Rescriptus has led some scholars to conclude that 616 is the original number of the beast.  If this variant is the original number of the Beast, it would be catastrophic to existing dispensational literature." -- Not necessarily, although I don't consider myself one of the "dispensationalists".  For one thing, I'm far less likely to take the "number of the Beast" just literally; it could easily be both, a literal and symbolic or figurative terminology.)

There's a lot of speculation concerning the "mark of the beast"; personally, I believe that it has something to do with DNA coding.  DNA coding are referred to by 'experts' as "markers".  The bible says that the number of the Beast is that of a Man -- indicating a deception concerning the species of the Beast, who attempt to pass themselves off as full-blooded Human beings.  Perhaps we may only be allowed to buy and sell (ie survive) if we are like them -- genetically.  Because they are so racist and discriminatory, referring to themselves as "the Family" (like the Mafia), etc. -- I would bet that's what it is.  They already do their damnedest to exclude and annihilate everyone who is not like them, particularly those of us who do not wish to obey them and/or sacrifice ourselves to them or their cause.
Most profile portraits of early American founders, and of contemporary American politicians and other wealthy patriarchal or corporate types, have very distinctively sloped foreheads and quite heavy browbones.  They often have prominent noses, too; and frequently have light-colored irises.  The Rhesus negative 'lobby' boasts that many American and World leaders have or had Rhesus negative bloodtypes.  It is probably accurately surmised that many royal personages were of Rhesus negative bloodtypes, based on their problems with fecundity and health issues among any of their children who managed to survive infancy.  Washington himself had no children, so I suspect Martha and he were both Rh-.

At one time (not sure if it's still a valid argument), the leadership of most Masonic lodges were recruited from among their members who have / had Rhesus negative bloodtypes -- especially O-.  And although they haven't always had the technology to test for the "Rhesus factor" -- they always, always followed hereditary (family) bloodlines.

(The real first US president was a "so-called black" man by the name of John Hanson.  In fact, under the Articles of the Confederation, we had seven presidents, before George Washingtion became the first president under the US Constitution.  For a while, the military threatened to overthrow the government and make Washington our first king.)

(A discussion about Rhesus negative blood.)
(Interesting, in many ways.)
(Government controlled websites always ignore Native Americans, as if we don't exist.)
(They have their own registry.  My former boss, a 33 degree Mason with O- blood, used to boast a lot about his blood donations to the Red Cross, due to the belief then, that his was the "universal donor type" -- it's not, really.  No Rhesus positive should ever accept Rhesus negative blood products barring a shortage of Rhesus positive blood.  But since Rhesus positive is the most abundant blood type in the population -- why should there ever be a shortage?  I really hope that the medical establishment isn't slipping that poison to us Rhesus positive types.  That would make me very angry, to say the least.)
(Rhesus negative people love talking about how special they supposedly are.  They commonly spread a lot of myths and misconceptions about themselves and their blood chemistry.)
(The Illuminati connection to Rhesus negative bloodtypes.)
(No.  Two of my children's bloodtypes remain a mystery to me, because the hospital where they were born refused to release that information to me -- their mother.  Yet, Rhesus negative mothers are routinely informed of their babies' bloodtypes.)
(Same speech, Illuminati website.)
(Secrecy involving sperm donation.)
(Both identity and health are good reasons to cut out medical secrecy.)
(More mumbo-jumbo and confusion.)
(Interesting discussion.)
(More lies and propaganda from ignorant Rhesus negatives, who don't know what an antigen is.)
(The Jewish connection to Rhesus negative bloodtypes.)
(Describes one of the earliest methods for the manufacture of Anti-Human -- ie anti-"D" -- globulin serum -- also known as Coombs' reagent.  Contrary to common belief, aided by heavy propaganda from Rhesus negatives themselves, along with a tight-lipped lack of information from the Red Cross and American Medical Association -- Rhesus negative bloodtypes lack the antigen or blood protein which reacts against Rhesus Macaque monkey blood serum.  Which means that Rhesus negative blood is compatible with the same... in other words, it doesn't agglutinate or curdle when exposed to monkey blood.  But Rhesus positive blood does agglutinate when in contact with it.  Why would Rhesus negative people seek to deceive Rhesus positives -- and one another -- about such a thing?  It can only be that they feel inferior because of it. )

(Secrets in Plain Sight -- long, but worth watching.)

(Many of us try -- sometimes in vain -- to figure it out.  This preacher has an interesting take on it; you can tell he's been thinking about it a lot.)

(Snake worshippers of Iraq.)

Tribal snake worship in the Amazon.

Pentacostal snake "handler".  I call it "tempting God", a big no-no.  Most Christians look down on this sort of traditional ritual.

("Interestingly enough, the founder of the snake handling movement, George Hensley, was illiterate. He could not read or study the Word of God and was totally dependent on what he was told it said. Traditions of men learned and passed down as truth. It is sad.")

On another note, I've often had the feeling as I entered the midst of certain groups of people (often at work, school, or even sometimes in church), that I was going into a nest or pit of vipers... now it makes more sense -- many of them are actually descended from Cain, or Serpent (Phallus or Fertility) worshippers.  They're evil, I can vouch for that.  Had I known they were Hybrids, I wouldn't ever have taken their abuses and their strangely secretive, deceptive behaviors so personally.  For the longest time (most of my life), I simply didn't know what to make of it:  why were that many people so evil?  It didn't make sense to me then, but now it does.


Ok, now it's confession time:  I have and/or had a few Freemasons and even a few Pentacostals in my own family tree.  I can't help that.  I also have some German ancestry; some of the Kimberlings were probably Freemasons, too.  My maternal g-grandfather and gg-grandfather were certainly documented Freemasons.  The Pentacostals (or maybe Assembly of God members) are also on Mother's side of the family (however, I'm sure they're not snake handlers -- they only speak ecstatically in "tongues", and wear plain clothes, and the women never cut their hair.  They do have blue eyes and are childless, however; so, maybe they're Rhesus negative.

On Dad's side of the tree, John Sevier might have been involved in Freemasonry (I'm not sure).  He was an American founding father, a Revolutionary soldier (war hero, really) and made the rank of General before his death.  He was very involved in politics.  He's described as having had "bright blue eyes".  So it's quite possible that he was.  But I really doubt it, because he seemed to be a very good-hearted and generous man.

Even more disturbing (to me, at least when I first learned of it), John Sevier's (ie our) g-grand-uncle, n times removed... Francis de Xavier (also known as Saint Francis Xavier) was a friend and associate of Ignatius de Loyola (also known as Saint Ignatius).  The two men co-founded the Society of Jesus, and Francis Xavier donated the Xavier castle at Navarre, Spain, to the Jesuits.  After the loss of the family's castle, our particular line of the Xavier family converted to Prostestantism -- they became Huguenots and moved to France, where they endured frequent Catholic persecution until they later escaped to London.

However, I'm sure that Francis Xavier was a sincerely pious and devout Christian, with no evil traits in him at all.  He'd been raised in a very loving Catholic home, and went into the priesthood out of a love for Humanity; I'm sure of that, based on his biography.  He died too young of suspicious circumstances, enroute to a mission in China.  The Pope had him working nonstop, traveling far and wide.  Xavier had decided to petition the Pope to ex-communicate at least one Portugese governor in the Phillipines(?), and I believe they murdered him by poison of some sort (to make it look like a natural death).  The crew of the ship upon which he fell ill, after leaving the Phillipines(?), were under orders to refuse him any help.  Instead, they left him to die alone on a cold, windy beach.

He too was truly a generous, kind-hearted "saint".  And I don't believe he would have involved himself with the Jesuits, had he been aware of how evil they really were and are to this day.  I'm sure that de Loyola and the Pope simply wanted his property (he was the sole heir of Navarre Castle).

Navarre Castle in Spain, now a Catholic shrine to Francis de Xavier.

(The Jesuits knocked down every part of the castle that they didn't like, such as certain towers, the gate, and the moat -- then built the huge attached cathedral seen on the left side of the structure.  Evidently it's now used by the Church as a "shrine" to Saint Francis Xavier; sort of like a museum, except they hold masses there, too.)

I understand too, that Huguenots were some of the first Master Masons (although I haven't found any blood relation to any of them, at least not so far).  Huguenots were among the most educated and skilled of Europeans in those times, and Freemasonry always recruits from the best because like the Jesuits, they see only dollar signs everywhere.  Also, Freemasonry represented itself as being anti-Rome, anti-Vatican, anti-Pope... and Huguenots had good reason to dislike the Catholic church.  Freemasonry is also, perhaps more so, associated with Lutheranism [UPDATE:  the Lutherans are only indirectly associated:  officially they are anti-Freemasonry; however, they are the founders of the Rosicrucians -- which IS associated with Freemasonry, per History of Freemasonry].
(A Huguenot, early Grand Mason.  He was elected the third Grand Master in England, in 1719.  He also, incidentally, invented the planetarium.  Another interesting fact to me, at least, is that he was born around the same time and place as my ancestor, Mary Gano / Marie Gerneaux, in Rochelle, France.  Rochelle was at that time a stronghold for Huguenots.)
(The Illuminati list the Huguenots as one of their "religious influences".)
(Desaguliers wrote a collection of Old Charges, considered an influential part of the Masonic literature.)
(While my ancestors fled to America, many Huguenots also escaped to South Africa.)
(The Good Huguenot king of France.)

(George Washington also had a Huguenot ancestor, Nicholas Martiau.)
(Paul Revere was a Huguenot and a Freemason.)
(A Huguenot Lodge, in Pennsylvania.)
(Huguenots rescued some Jews from the "Holocaust".  That's what I would expect of them, they believed like so many other Christians, that Jews are God's "chosen people"... the Jews they rescued, are/were most likely true, real Israelite Jews, too -- because those are the ones which were targetted by Hitler and the Nazis.)

(According to my sources, Lutherans don't particulary care for Freemasonry, so someone is being a bit deceptive about the issue, somehow.)
(According to this source, "Catholics often become Freemasons despite the Vaticans 'official' stance against Freemasonry... And 'Mormonism' is also a very controlling and authoritarian religion but, strangely, many of its members are Freemasons. This is largely historical, as the founders of this religion were Freemasons and borrowed many elements of our ritual to incorporate into their ceremonies. [For example, the square and compass are represented on the breast of the sacred undergarments, and many other ritual elements were borrowed for the Temple Ceremony]."  Lol, I'd forgotten about their underwear.)
(Now I remember!  The Lutherans are associated with the Rosicrucians -- not Freemasonry; yet the Freemasons, according to History of Freemasonry, greatly admire and probably practice the 'Rosy Cross' rites.  Strange, but fits into my theory that the Freemasons' ultimate goal is to create a Pantheistic World Church.)

But I'm sure like Francis Xavier, had the Huguenots known what they really were getting mixed up in, they would have steered clear of it.  And I'm sure my father and grandfather likewise wouldn't have had anything to do with it.  That's probably why although very intelligent, they were not wealthy men.  And both died too young, like St. Francis Xavier, under suspicious circumstances.

(John Sevier was my 6th g-grandfather, on Dad's side.)
(St. Francis Xavier was my g-granduncle, n times removed, on Dad's side.)
(Benjamin Franklin Kimberling was one of my g-grand-uncles.  He's speaking here of my ggg-grandfather, on Mother's side.)
(Dr. James Isaac Thompson was a Freemason; he was my g-grandfather on Mother's side.)
(D.G. [Demosthenes Gracchus or "Grack"] Morrow was a Freemason; he was my gg-grandfather on Mother's side.]
(This man was my first cousin, n times removed.  Very politically prominent, and probably a Freemason.  He and his father, Israel, helped found Harvard College with 300 acres of land for the campus and their first dormitory, Stoughton Hall.  William Stoughton attended Harvard and also taught there shortly after graduating.  He is notoriously famous for his involvement as lead magistrate in the Salem Witch Trials.)

Beyond those listed above, It's a near certainty that Queens of England, Mary II (wife of William L'Orange) and Anne; and their mother, Lady Anne Hyde -- are somewhat distantly related to us Denmans, too.  Their gg-grandfather was Reverend Francis Denman (Protestant), the son of Nicholas Denman and Lady Anne Hercy.  Mary and Anne were also Protestants (probably Church of England, or "Episcopalian", which is really nothing less than another form of Catholicism).  Lady Anne Hyde, although born into a Protestant family, married a Catholic (King James II, the Duke of York) and secretly converted to the Catholic faith.

And it's quite possible that although all three women were brown-eyed, Lady Anne, Mary II and Queen Anne were all Rhesus negative, based on the fact that they all had extreme difficulty bearing live infants to term.  Among their few living children, only Mary and Anne survived to adulthood.  That would suggest a hereditary issue around fecundity.  I would assume that their husbands were also all Rhesus negatives, if that's the case.

I love my family, both the living ones and the ancestors, but I am not proud of some of their involvements with the Jesuits, the Illuminati, or with Freemasonry.  However, it's there -- I won't deny it, even if I could do so.

I've spoken now, about my feelings concerning Freemasonry.  The truth about them angers me:  that they've violated our Civil Rights; and I will never forgive them for it.  Because I don't believe for one moment that their leadership of Hybrids will ever repent or become true Human beings.

I already examined earlier, the interdependent nature of the Freedoms of Speech and of Belief (religion).  Now I wish to point out, that without these two crucial Civil Rights, yet another of our important, Divine, natural Human Rights is arbitrarily stolen from us:  the Right to Pursue Happiness.  Because a person may not "pursue Happiness" in an environment of discrimination, such as we Individual citizens now endure in Corporatized America.  It is unconstitutional for our government to afford and extend more favor toward groups and corporations than to Individual citizens.

Furthermore, every homeless person in America is an Individual whose Rights have been violated by our government, through their economic policies.  Because, contrary to our arrogant, lying politicians, bureaucrats, and corporate heavyweights -- no one "chooses" to be homeless:  it's an inHuman, in-Humane, condition which leads to death.  Although usually labelled "crazy" or "insane" by our hard-hearted 'establishment' or by the 'authorities' -- they're not really; they're mostly just homeless, sick and/or poor.  The majority of homeless people are the most defenseless, passive, generous and hard-working, from among our society.  They are older people; injured or sick people who have been denied Social Security and can't work or hold jobs; women who are paid lower salaries than most men; mothers with small children whose fathers have abandonned them; people without large, prosperous and generous families to depend on for help in times of need; people who are suffering discrimination for political, social or economic reasons.  It isn't fair, it's unjust.

For the "Pursuit of Happiness" to have any real value as a Human Right, it must have true, concrete meaning.  It doesn't mean, "the Right to be filthy stinking rich at the expense of others less greedy than you".  It doesn't mean, "the Right to rob your neighbors of their livelihood".  It doesn't mean, "the Right to exploit the whole planet and everyone on it".  It doesn't mean, "the Right to be inefficient and wasteful because Uncle Sam will always bail you out".  It doesn't mean, "the Right to live like royalty or like little gods".

What does every Human being need and deserve, in order to maintain some hope of Happiness?  Simply Shelter, Food, Fuel for heat, potable Water, clean Air and Soil, adequate Clothing, Health, Liberty and reasonable Safety...  Anyone doing without those few basic life-sustaining essentials, has been stripped of all Human dignity; they've been denied their Civil Rights.

Even stray animals are guaranteed those simple life-sustaining basics in America -- but not Human beings.  That is a travesty of injustice.


The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men [Humans] are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.  — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men [Human beings], deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such a Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. [Governmental secrecy.]

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people. [Undermining justice.]

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands. [Preventing citizens from leaving England, holding them captive on English soil.  The king often stopped ships from embarking to America, for that reason.]

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. [Controlling judges.]

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. [Bloated bureaucracy, for the purpose of harassing and exploiting ordinary citizens.]

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended [false] Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended [false] offences:

For abolishing the free system of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their [government leaders'] Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and condition.  [Today they use the internet, especially Anonymous, hackers, and paid trolls to incite anarchy, infighting and murders.]

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott
New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton
North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton


We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. [Very important.]

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

(Argument against life terms for Supreme Court judges... I believe, unlike the author cited here, that there should also be strict term limits on Congress and the Senate -- no more career politicians, especially among legislators. Also: all of them are way overpaid.)
Office of Management and Budget ("website not found", LOL)
Council of Economic Advisers ("website not found"... what a surprise)
(Their main attention is on "young" entrepreneurs and military veterans)

Curiously, many of the White House official website's subdivisions are undeveloped or have been shut down.
The part of the Pentagon which is available to the Public...
Military news -- very quiet; not much going on here, apparently.
(Bureau of Reclamation)
(Bureau of Labor Statistics)
(Industry and Security)
(Council on Foreign Relations)

Lizzie must really like him, for some reason -- wax figures of the two together.

He toasts her.

Whispers in her ear.

Michelle treats the Queen of England like her own grandmother.  Seems Grandma doesn't mind a bit.

She's a funny lady.

Elizabeth is the Head of Freemasonry worldwide, yet she gets along famously with all the Popes.

An intimate stroll through the gardens.

(Interesting website, lots of papal, political news here.)

The little girl in this Vatican footage truly looks and behaves possessed by demons.

Obama bows to the king of Saudi Arabia; the Arabians seem quite amused.

Looks like quite a hunk of gold chain, there.

Now he's really pimped out.

Playtime.  Politicians always have such a sense of humor.

Muslims and Catholics get along just fine, I see.

Chavez and Obama adore each other.

The Saudi king is popular with all the Presidents.  Bush looks very excited.  I notice they also both have 'banana thumbs', lol.

Obama here, with his newly appointed Secretary of the Treasury, a North Korean native.  Hillary Clinton's wearing a red Chinese (or Asian) style blazer jacket.

(There's a Hillary cult, and a red jacket cult among female politicians.)

She enjoys making troll faces, too; like any middle-school aged kid.

Wearing another expensive Asian style jacket (I like Asian style too, but would prefer to dress more traditinally 'American', if I were in American politics).  I wonder how much it costs US taxpayers to maintain their teeth (not to mention all the other luxuries to which they are accustomed).

In Morocco, I believe.  The Prime Minister has 'banana thumbs'.

Winking (and yes, looks like another Chinese style jacket); husband Bill Clinton also often winks at his audience.  Besides the ape-like gestures, hand-signs and secret signals which they often use, the Illuminati are noted for coy behavior.


  1. (esp. of a woman) Making a pretense of shyness or modesty that is intended to be alluring but is often regarded as irritating.
  2. Reluctant to give details, esp. about something regarded as sensitive.
(In other words, secretive or deceptive.)

She reportedly complimented the Mexican monsignour for his "...marvelous virgin..."

Janet Napolitano testifying before a Senate judiciary hearing, wearing her own Asian style red jacket.  I believe without reservation, that Ms. Napolitano is in fact a hermaphrodite who is genetically more male than female, but was raised as a 'girl'.  Her father, Leonard Napolitano, is the Dean of Anatomy at the University of New Mexico... they named their new Anatomy department after him.

Many male politicians are fond of wearing red ties, too; the color red, symbolizes blood -- as in "Family", or (in Italian) "Mafia".

Crocadile tears.  The vast majority of them have blue eyes (although they claim blue eyes are in the minority, and even "endangered" due to their recessive nature).  'Banana thumbs', another expressed recessive gene, are also very common among the "elite" and 'celebrities'.  He cries a lot, but I think it's probably due to allergies, or something.

Another acting President.  They're more stage performers than statesmen.  I once coincidentally passed within a few feet of him upstairs in the 'ballroom' at the country club where I was then employed.  Although only campaigning for the presidency at the time (ca 1976), he was flanked on both sides by bodyguards.  The four of us were the only ones present at that moment.  He was wearing rouge on his cheeks, and appeared confused and a little bit afraid of me.  I found it offensive that he didn't speak to or greet me.


Just this past Sunday, I sat down to cool off for a while in a small informal dining area in town.  An interesting elderly man was there too, very friendly and talkative without any encouragement from me.  At first he just talked about his cats.  He'd rescued a Bobcat kitten and raised it to adulthood, enjoyed it very much ("it weighed fifty pounds", he said), then accidently lost it when it escaped through the door one day about seven months ago.  The one he has now, 'talks' to him, lol.  It says, "alright", "I love you", and some other phrases.  Yes, some of them talk, I conceded.

After a bit of light conversation, he got pretty serious and changed the subject.  He said that he now believes the three years he spent fighting in World War II were all in vain.  Momentarilly speechless, I answered yes, it does often seem to be all in vain.  And then he added, looking me right in the eye, "I don't think it's going to last past this year (2012)."  Again I missed a beat, then agreed, "Yes, I don't see how things can continue on this way for much longer."

The assassination of ambassador to Austria, Archduke Franz Ferninand, kicked off WWI ... A co-conspirator, Freemason Nedeljko Čabrinović, testified in court at his trial for the crime, that "... In Freemasonry it is permitted to kill..."

(A serious discussion regarding the gunman, Gavrilo Princip's, Jewish and Masonic identity.)

(This Christian author doesn't grasp the fact that "Jews" are also Aryans / Indo-Europeans; he doesn't realize in this c1972 paper, that neither Jews, Aryans nor Indo-Europeans are in reality true Semites.  The whole essay is based on commonly held racial misconceptions and deceptions.  Of course, it was written prior to later scientific and scholarly advances in Genetics, DNA, Archeology and History.)

Which Way Western Man? c1978, William Gayley Simpson
(footnotes to the above)

"Tob shebbe goyim ('cattle', or 'Gentiles') harog" (Talmud, Sanhedrin 59), means "Kill all the best Gentiles".
Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin

WWII... more than 43.5 million civilian and military casualties (Chinese civilian deaths not counted)

WWI -- This war supposedly toppled the European monarchies.

Korean War -- The one my father helped fight.

Vietnam War -- the one I heard about almost daily, throughout my childhood.

Persian Gulf War -- the one in which American women became combat soldiers.  I guess that's what they call "equality".

(Only one of many cases of sexual harassment of female soldiers.  Some female soldiers have also been murdered by jealous male soldiers; and some have been murdered for the purpose of avoiding paternity suits.)


Chinese, in dress uniforms (mini-skirts).

The Russian military holds beauty contests for their female soldiers.  Notice the variation in skirt lengths and styles of shoes.

The Russian female Winter dress uniform is tres chic, n'est ce pas?

Lmao.  North Korean.

Vietnamese, presumably.

This North Korean soldier is styled like a Japanese geisha.

I'm not very surprised to see that there's a fetish for women in military uniforms, online.

Here, an Israeli military dog attacks a Palestinian woman who is evidently unarmed.

North Korea

China, in parade uniform.

Russian Victory Day parade, 2012.

American soldiers, praying together.

The US spends more money on the military, than fifteen countries combined (according to one source).  But hey, think how bad unemployment would be, without them...

One of the most despicable and heart-breaking acts of war ever committed -- for those of us who have hearts.  I will never forget it, and never forgive the perpetrators of it.
"The Inspector General of the CIA conducted an internal review of the CIA's pre-9/11 performance and was harshly critical of senior CIA officials for not doing everything possible to confront terrorism.  He criticized their failure to stop two of the 9/11 hijackers, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, as they entered the United States and their failure to share information on the two men with the FBI.  In May 2007, senators from both major U.S. political parties drafted legislation to make the review public.  One of the backers, Senator Ron Wyden said, "The American people have a right to know what the Central Intelligence Agency was doing in those critical months before 9/11."

Rumsfeld's "Shock and Awe" campaign against Saddam Hussein... all of Iraq suffered for it.




Syria attacks Damascus.

Iranian warships.

Stealth bomber with jets.

NASA does it's part.

King Philip's War (also known as the first war with American Indians).  Roger Williams, later governor of Rhode Island, heroically delayed its onset, saving many lives.

French-Indian War

Tuscarora War

Chief Osceola, during the Seminole Wars... "On October 21, 1837, on the orders of U.S. General Thomas Sidney Jesup, Osceola was captured when he arrived for supposed truce negotiations in Fort Peyton. He was imprisoned at Fort Marion, St. Augustine, Florida. Osceola's capture by deceit caused a national uproar. General Jesup and the administration were condemned by many congressional leaders. That December, Osceola and other Seminole prisoners were moved to Fort Moultrie, South Carolina. They were visited by townspeople."

He later died while in prison, apparently of pneumonia.

Battle of Little Bighorn (also known as Custer's Last Stand).

The Cherokee Removal -- also known as the Trail of Tears.  Many thousands died, mostly children and sick or elderly people.
(I just want to point out, that it's possible for an American to have ancestors on both sides of the issue, as I do.)

Spanish American War

War of 1812

Hernando De Sota a Spanish Catholic conquistador spawned from a Jewish converso family, bragged about how easily he could pick off the Natives with his musket, " rabbits..."

Spanish conquistador, D'Avila, torturing French Huguenot "infidels" in Florida.  This picture is very hard for me to look at.  It's unimaginable for me, that anyone would treat Human beings in such a cruel, inhumane manner.  Yet indeed the Inquisition was filled with such atrocities in the name of Catholicism, enough to boggle the mind, for around 700 years.  I'm sure its legacy remains among us, even today.  Besides the massive losses of life from it, it must indelibly mark the minds and attitudes of descendants on both sides of the conflict.

Confederate prisoners of the American Civil War.  The irony is that slavery should have never been legal to begin with.  Many courthouse and other documents were destroyed during this war, wiping out much of our nation's history... I believe our government now wages another war against the citizenry -- a covert one, this time.


Genesis 3

Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.

And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?

And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.

And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?

And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.

And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;

Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;

In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.

And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.

So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.


The Tower of Babel, and the Confusion of Languages

Revelation 16:19

And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath.

Revelation 18:21

And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.

Revelation 14:8

And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.

Revelation 18:2

And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.


Revelation 1:8

I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

Revelation 21:6

And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.


A lot of people fear that the New World Order wishes to replace "religion" (systems of belief, in other words) with Atheism, but that's not true.  Their vision of a World Church, One Religion, is a Pantheist's dream; anything goes:  Atheism, Paganism, Wicca, every sect of Christianity (Protestant or Catholic), every sect of Judaism, every sect of Islam, every sect of Buddhism, Hinduism, Mysticism, even Satanism and Luciferianism.  And I don't disagree that everyone should have the Right to believe as they wish (as long as their actions don't violate the Civil Rights of Others) -- that's been my whole point all along.  But, I don't want all those State-sanctioned and -approved religions shoved down my throat, either -- and that's exactly what happens when government establishes and promotes religion.

The government doesn't need to do that, in order to provide for "religious freedom" -- we already have that Right, per the US Constitution.  Our Right to freedom of religion is violated, however, each and every time Congress establishes another church, mosque, temple, or synagogue, by tax exemption -- thus favoring a group's "Rights" over that of Individuals.  Individuals must pay taxes.  In doing so, they are monetarily promoting certain types of organized religions at the expense of individual reason.  We don't all need to have priests and/or others tell or instruct us how to believe, regarding spiritual matters.  And those who do desire guidance, may easily get it from their churches that are not State sanctioned.

Because, churches don't really need government funding to exist anyway:  any of them which can't attain private, community support on their own, have no valid excuse to construct a building for meetings or rituals.  If our Laws had been properly upheld from the beginning, we wouldn't have a fraction of the huge, gaudy cathedrals and other houses of "worship" that we do now.  All that land would have been available for housing.

And I don't believe that the citizenry would have been any less moral than they are now, with all those thousands of established religions.  In fact, it seems the more powerful and strictly organized religions we have in society, the less moral people become:  they become extremely materialistic, for one thing, because that's what a building is -- a physical structure.  They also become more divisive and hateful toward anyone who doesn't share their own creeds and doctrines.

Number of Mosques in America:  2,106 (increase of 42% between 1990-2000; increase of 74% since 2000); the number of private mosques has been estimated to be near 100,000.

......................Catholic churches:  196 Dioceses (7 of which are vacant); roughly 25% of Americans are Catholic, although the number of Catholic parishes ranks third of all religions in the US (no specific number given).

...................Protestant churches:  Megachurches (+2000 members): ~1200 churches; Others: too many to count.

...................Jewish synagogues:  Roughly 3,750

....................Buddhist Temples:  Approximately 87

......................Masonic Lodges:  Too many to count.
(How Obama is Muslimizing America.)
(A White House produced video, promoting the religion of Islam.)
("Do Masons Have Secrets?  "Of course they do... that keeps pretenders out!")
(Lists US Lodges.  Admiral Richard Byrd even established one on Antartica, which apparently doesn't ever get any use -- go figure.)


Two former leaders of Argentina charged with stealing at least 400 babies from "political prisoners"... I wonder 1- Were they Freemasons?; and 2- Are they Jews? (Argentina has one of the highest concentrations of Jewish population in the world.)

Remember, the Pope and the Queen of England are both being investigated or have been charged already, with child trafficking.

Jorge Videla and Reynaldo Bignone, fascists.
(Argentine President, Nestor Kirchner, had Bignone's portrait removed from the National War College, in 2004).

"According to estimates, at least 9,000 and perhaps up to 30,000 Argentinians were subjected to forced disappearance (desaparecidos) and most likely killed; many were illegally detained and tortured, and others went into exile.  In the book Disposición Final by Argentine journalist Ceferino Reato, Videla confirms for the first time that between 1976 and 1983, 8.000 argentinians have been murdered by his regime.  The bodies were hidden or destroyed to prevent protests at home and abroad.  Some 11,000 Argentines have applied for and received up to US$200,000 as monetary compensation from the state for the loss of loved ones during the military dictatorship.  The Asamblea por los Derechos Humanos (APDH or Assembly for Human Rights) believes that 12,261 people were killed or disappeared during the "National Reorganization Process".  Politically, all legislative power was concentrated in the hands of Videla's nine-man junta, and every single important position in the national government was filled with loyal military officers."

A lot of Americans, both adults and children, also go missing every year without a trace.  And, it seems that although our law enforcement agencies have every technological and educational resource (besides the manpower) that taxpayers' money can buy, at their disposable -- comparatively few cases are ever solved satisfactorily.  It's shameful that we tolerate and accept so much corruption, incompetency and inefficiency from our elected officials and bureaucrats.


This past Fourth of July, as I strolled through my neighborhood I took note of which houses had flags fluttering out front (most of them are only displayed on certain patriotic holidays); and I realized that the people most proud of their citizenship were also the wealthiest, most socially connected -- and most bigoted, of the whole bunch.  All were most likely Republicans, as this is Dick Cheney's state (Wyoming), and I'm probably the only registered Democrat within miles of my house.

All have so much to be grateful for, yet they instead behave as if they are somehow entitled to special treatment.  All look down disdainfully upon people less fortunate, or different, than themselves.  None are particularly gifted, skilled or intelligent.  None work any harder than average.  But all have the plum types of jobs, or are at least securely employed.  Most of them golf, are members of various clubs including the Country Club and keep their front lawns well watered and very green.  They become quite anxious at the sight of a dandelion or any kind of weed.  Loose dogs annoy them, because they're concerned about the possibility of a mess on their grass.  They all drive late-model cars, and their teenage children also drive expensive vehicles.

One couple sics their schnauzer on me as I walk past their house, then pretends it's 'accidental'.  They are amused at the thought of giving me a heart attack, I suppose.  I'm not scared though, because the dog won't bite me -- just makes a bit of racket (besides, I'm onto their little game).  The wife is a nurse at Memorial Hospital.

One woman (who lives across the street from the schnauzer people) smokes on her front doorstep, flicking her butts into the gutter in front of her house (although they spend hours daily, putzing around with yardwork).  She recently had a baby.  They never acknowledge me when I walk past, although I once heard her loudly inform her husband (with backs turned, just feet away from me), "... she's crazy..."  "I know," he answered.  I don't know either of them from Adam, have never met or had any contact with them -- so, not sure how they arrive at such a conclusion.  Both of their cars display out-of-state tags on them, too.  But it's a small town, and word does get around.  Especially when you're an 'insider'.

One elderly lady (a Walmart cashier) who lives to the North of my home, never smiles but always gives me a dirty look when I make eye contact with her.  She hated my dog, when it was alive, blaming her for the mess in her unfenced yard (meanwhile, the entire neighborhood is heavily populated with deer, birds, rabbits, cats and even the occasional skunk, field mouse or prairie dog).  Answering her complaint, I pointed out that I had recently witnessed another neighbor's shelty using her front yard for a bathroom on a near-daily basis, she never mentioned it again -- but didn't apologize or thank me, either.  She must have spoken to the neighbor across the street about her shelty, because it stopped visiting her yard immediately afterwards.  I'd always tried very diligently to keep my dog away from there, because I knew how she was.  My dog's been gone for more than two years now, but I still try not to make eye contact with the old lady anymore.  Her expression was so chilling, so unpleasant.  When her garden banner blew into my yard one day, I just quietly returned it, hoping she wouldn't notice that I'd trespassed in order to do so.

About 10-15 years ago, I'd worked for another of my flag-flying neighbors (two doors down).  I'd worked very hard, lots of overtime and night shifts, and taken on a lot of responsibilities for very little pay.  I did it for my children, who only had myself to depend on.  One day, he forced me to quit by making my life so miserable that I couldn't stand the stress any more -- about a month after he'd informed me that his wife "needs a job".  As general manager at a popular local restaurant (famous for flying a massive, bedspread-sized American flag over it, easily seen from the interstate), his salary was at that time no less than $80,000 / year (I only made $9.50 / hour, in a management position).  He'd explained that he wanted to employ his wife in the bakery, but didn't think it would work out for me to be her supervisor.  I was speechless and very busy as usual working when he made the announcement, but didn't know what to do about it.  I'd been there for nearly five years, but jobs are scarce in this town.  She got the job of course, and he won the subsequent unemployment compensation case, too.  I didn't know that by quitting (even as I was under duress, being pressured by him at the time) -- I gave up all hope of even a little bit of help in my time of need.  Of course he knew exactly what he was doing, and also that it was his word against mine.  Luckily, I had saved and wisely invested about $7,000.  I haven't spoken to either of them since that day (even though he afterwards had the nerve to try to borrow my wheelbarrow one time, using my young daughter as messenger).

Last but not least, there is a neighbor whose house is only barely visible to me from my kitchen window, but I'm sure they're flag-wavers, too.  The wife, a heavy-set woman named Diane, is a career bureaucrat with "Family Services".  Not long before my abrupt 'dismissal' from my job at the restaurant bakery, during the time when I was working the longest hours (overtime and weekends, every week), and shortly after I'd had a mild heart attack (if there is such a thing), she made big trouble for me and my family.  While she was at her office, her young son (about 7-8 years old, and supposedly under the supervision of his teenaged step-sister) used to come to our home along with a pack of other small boys, for the purpose of begging 'treats' from my overly generous daughter (age 11 at the time).  I'd always supplied her with lots of goodies to eat while I was working that didn't require cooking, because I knew how much she loved to eat.  I asked her to stop giving away all her food to the neighbor's kids, "because they're just taking advantage of your generosity and I can't afford to feed you and them too".

Well, after she'd given them all or most of her convenience foods, she thought it only fair to go begging over at their house.  However, not only did the big sister refuse to give her anything, but she reported to her step-mom (the DFS agent) that I must be "starving" my child.  Hence the subsequent investigation and intrusion into our family's privacy.  Of course, they found no evidence of abuse or neglect.  My child wasn't "starving" (was very healthy, in fact -- not thin at all).  There were no health or safety issues in my home (no sharp objects, poisons, fire hazards, filth, etc.), and the cupboards were full of accessible food, with a working microwave oven available for heating things up or cooking (I forbade her to use the stove while I was at work).

But they were already committed to the case, and had to nail me with something.  So they charged me with having a "messy house"... lol.  I had to clean it all up by their deadline (mainly a lot of clutter and disarray, due to my child's hyperactivity and my utter exhaustion).  I had to attend some weird sort of group counseling sessions a couple of times.  And my daughter had to be the oldest child in "daycare" for about six months (until around her twelfth birthday, if I recall correctly).  Of course, I also had to pay for the daycare...

The worst injury my hyperactive daughter ever received, was a concussion -- which occured at school on the 'playground'.  I paid the doctor bill, of course.  She once cut her chin at a neighbor's house (stitches); and another time, tried to pet a neighbor's dog through their fence (it bit her).  I paid for all of it.  Oh yeah, another small dog chased her on her bike one day and left a nasty bite-bruise on her leg.  That neighbor unexpectedly brought me some game meat afterwards, in lieu of an apology.  I couldn't eat the antelope (it tasted rank, as usual).  At my former boss' house (before he dumped me) she accidentally caused their son to need stitches (they were playing with golf clubs over there).  I felt bad about it and apologized, but they told me not to be concerned.  I guess that's understandable.

Other than the skirmishes with my hyperactive child, there was the ultra-conservative neighbor who'd poisoned my dog (I later overheard him bragging about it to some of his friends, confirming my suspicions).  Describing his 'method', he said he'd spiked raw hamburger meat with rat poison.  My sweet young dog had died in agony, and the worst thing about it is:  he didn't deserve it.  Anyhow, the poisoner's adult daughter (who molested my teenage son, by the way:  yes, I reported it -- she left town and never came back), told me prior to the poisoning incident, that her father was habitually cruel to animals.  "He captured a neighbor's dog and left it locked up in the garage, to starve slowly to death," she informed me.

One day I witnessed him capture a large Rat, King or Bull snake and turn it over to the neighborhood bully / sadist, to kill for him.  He had a psychopathic gleam in his eyes when he did that.  He'd been a "boxer" (causing him irreparable brain damage, evidently).  His young bully friend once had to pay for replacing the glass in my front door -- which I caught him breaking deliberately.  No apology from his mother, she seemed more annoyed with me than with her son.  Another of his young teenage friends (yet another bully, in a small town teeming with them) used to torment my surviving dog, and broke my poor cat's tail.  That boy died in a snowmobile accident soon afterwards, however.

The same small town's public works manager once peppersprayed both of my dogs, as a matter of convenience for himself (he showed up to work on some utilities near our fence one day, and apparently didn't have the patience or time to inform us so I could get the dogs into the house for him), when both were still only half-grown (the poisoned one was just barely full-grown when he died).  When I'd heard the dogs barking, I immediately went to the door, where of course I witnessed his attack on my dogs just moments before I could call them inside.  It angered me so much, that I wrote a letter to the local paper's editor about it (probably the only time I've ever done so).  The pepper-sprayer was also one of the poisoner's good friends...

You might think that we live in some ghetto, but no -- this is "middle-class America", folks.  There are far worse neighborhoods than this, at least materially.  However, I doubt any are more violent or generally insane than this one.  Just this week, a man stabbed his neighbor (a woman) several times, over some trivial (yet obviously very heated) argument they had about the landscaping at their apartments.  The victim of the knife assault lived through it miraculously, but the suspect died afterwards, "mysteriously": in the hospital where he was presumably being treated or evaluated for mental illness.  Did his death result from a "medical lynching"?  I believe so, and expect that the authorities will cover it all up, too.  Knowing that hospital's medical staff as I do, I certainly wouldn't put it past them, to take the law into their own hands.  They've already been known to play the roles of judges, juries and executioners.  They carry attitudes of self-entitlement, authoritarianism.

All of these flag-flyers have abundant cash to spend on material things.  Each week their garbage containers are overflowing with trash.  Not one of them ever bother to recycle any of it, even though the city has designated recycling centers close by.  Time is money, after all.  And who needs a conscience, when you are among the "elite"?  During the American Revolution era, I'm sure they all would have been Loyalists (also known as Royalists).

The Pledge of Allegiance was adopted by Congress in 1942.

"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."  (Original, 1892 version)
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." (1923)
In 1954, in response to the Communist threat of the times, President Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add the words "under God," creating the 31-word pledge we say today.  Bellamy's daughter objected to this alteration. Today it reads:
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Section 4 of the Flag Code states:
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag: "I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.", should be rendered by standing at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. When not in uniform men should remove any non-religious headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. Persons in uniform should remain silent, face the flag, and render the military salute."
The original Bellamy salute, first described in 1892 by Francis Bellamy, who authored the original Pledge, began with a military salute, and after reciting the words "to the flag," the arm was extended toward the flag.
At a signal from the Principal the pupils, in ordered ranks, hands to the side, face the Flag. Another signal is given; every pupil gives the flag the military salute — right hand lifted, palm downward, to a line with the forehead and close to it. Standing thus, all repeat together, slowly, "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands; one Nation indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all." At the words, "to my Flag," the right hand is extended gracefully, palm upward, toward the Flag, and remains in this gesture till the end of the affirmation; whereupon all hands immediately drop to the side.
The Youth's Companion, 1892
Shortly thereafter, the pledge was begun with the right hand over the heart, and after reciting "to the Flag," the arm was extended toward the Flag, palm-down.

In World War II, the salute too much resembled the Nazi salute, so it was changed to keep the right hand over the heart throughout.


I received a timely and relevant newsletter from Coast to Coast AM today.  I will quote part of it here, for you:

"... author Charles Upton, a lifelong student of comparative religion and metaphysics, shared his contention that the Illuminati or globalist elites are attempting to manipulate spirituality to create a system which is the enemy of traditional religions, including Christianity and Islam. A process he called "counter-initiation" is enabling the Illuminati to move toward their plan, and includes syncretism-- the attempt to make one religion out of all religions, and spiritual evolutionism-- the notion that we are evolving to a higher spiritual level, he argued.

"If the Illuminati can control a religion the size of Islam or the Catholic church, they can control billions of people, "and at the same time, they don't believe in God, they want the religions deconstructed; they want to do what they can to destroy them," he said. They may start out offering a kind of utopian promise, but then more and more has to be sacrificed to reach their goal, he continued. He also connected aspects of UFOs, Freemasons, and Knights Templar to a dark side of spirituality..."

(For the record, I don't believe that UFOs are "aliens from outer space".  But I do believe the Illuminati exploits them in order to promote terror and mass hysteria.)

One last point:  Atheism and Darwinism are both religions, because a) "religion" is defined as "system(s) of belief(s)"; and b) Atheists and Darwinists are by no means rational or scientific, since most of the outspoken ones behave exactly like any other fanatics, and their beliefs have no real basis (ie, they're unproven).


This article on the official Whitehouse blog, is positively surreal.  Organized religion is very much involved with the military, it seems.  Dr. Jill Biden (the VP's wife) is grateful for the "support" her family's church gave, when their son was deployed to Iraq...  they merely mentioned his name in their church newsletter!

She cites another case where a young mother is grateful to her church for providing "toiletries" and "beds for her two toddlers"... after a "domestic dispute" which I must assume involved herself and her soldier husband.  Wow, that's what they call "support"?  Any neighbor or family member could have done the same.  And any church ought to do even more for the poor (which would include mothers of young children whose fathers aren't supportive).  However they make the time to hold meetings, conferences about these very trivial matters.  High officials of the federal government praise established religions for giving the military their 'stamp of (social and moral) approval'.

It seems the real intent is to make America's professional mercenaries and their families feel like they're doing the 'right' thing, regardless.  "The Church is behind you, so it's all right."  "We understand why you attacked your wife; you're excused, because you were in the military... let's sign you up for disability right away, since it was obviously the combat that caused you to be mentally or emotionally deranged."  Not that having an extremely aggressive personality led them to voluntarily join up in the first place, oh no.  Not that it was their preferred job.

Maybe their employers want to distract soldiers from the fact that the government promises a lot more than they deliver.

We now have a 'warrior caste' in America.  I live in a town near a VA psychiatric facility, where many of the men residing here are patients.  More often than not, when they introduce themselves to me, they start off by saying, "I'm a disabled veteran," as if that's their occupation.  I would prefer them to tell me their names, first.  Many of the worst violent crimes that have occurred here over the years, have been committed by patients of that military hospital (rapes, murders, mass murder, etc.).

But nearly everyone cowtows to them as though they are gods (or infants).  They spoil them rotten:  "We love our soldiers!"  One local business which sells flooring, advertizes a 10 percent discount for "Seniors and Military"...  After all, we've been long conditioned with propaganda to believe the condradiction, that 'war makes peace'.  Sadly, most people of our civilization religiously believe a slew of conflicting "facts", all very cliche and stereotyped, spoonfed to them by Church (Mosque, Synagogue, Temple, etc.), Media and the Department of Education.  They've been trained to allow the various (government approved, of course) "authorities" do their thinking for them.


And now our illustrious government suggests that we, the proudest and richest nation on earth, pray for food?  You might think that with all their (supposedly ourresources, no Americans should ever go hungry.  What have they done with all that money?  Oh yeah, I forgot... wasted it.  Once again, the government using religion to manipulate the minds and emotions of citizens, while distracting us from the real issue:  their incompetency.

"The federal, state, and local tax systems in the United States have been marked by significant changes over the years in response to changing circumstances and changes in the role of government.  The types of taxes collected, their relative proportions, and the magnitudes of the revenues collected are all far different than they were 50 or 100 years ago.  Some of these changes are traceable to specific historical events, such as a war or the passage of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution that granted the Congress the power to levy a tax on personal income.  Other changes were more gradual, responding to changes in society, in our economy, and in the roles and responsibilities that government has taken unto itself...

"For most of our nation's history, individual taxpayers rarely had any significant contact with Federal tax authorities as most of the Federal government's tax revenues were derived from excise taxes, tariffs, and customs duties.  Before the Revolutionary War, the colonial government had only a limited need for revenue, while each of the colonies had greater responsibilities and thus greater revenue needs, which they met with different types of taxes.  For example, the southern colonies primarily taxed imports and exports, the middle colonies at times imposed a property tax and a "head" or poll tax levied on each adult male, and the New England colonies raised revenue primarily through general real estate taxes, excise taxes, and taxes based on occupation. 

"England's need for revenues to pay for its wars against France led it to impose a series of taxes on the American colonies.  In 1765, the English Parliament passed the Stamp Act, which was the first tax imposed directly on the American colonies, and then Parliament imposed a tax on tea.  Even though colonists were forced to pay these taxes, they lacked representation in the English Parliament.  This led to the rallying cry of the American Revolution that "taxation without representation is tyranny" and established a persistent wariness regarding taxation as part of the American culture..."

I'm afraid most people really aren't as wary about "taxation without representation" as they ought to be, these days.  We should be asking ourselves and government, "Where is the value for our hard-earned money which we pay the government and entrust with them?"  "Why does the wealthiest nation on Earth, the one with the most resources, squander it, and allow citizens to go hungry and homeless?"  "Why are our mortgages so expensive that real estate is always in bank finance?"  "Why isn't all of our families' properties (especially our homes and produce gardens) finally paid for, after hundreds of years of colonization here?"  "Why have we allowed corporations to enjoy preferential treatment over Individuals?"  "Why do government bureaucrats, on average, earn more than twice the salary package rates than ordinary civilians?"

These are only a few of the questions we need to ask.  And we need answers, now -- not "later".



(A very biased treatise on the subject.  This author never mentions any other than negro slavery by "whites" -- as if that were the only kind.  That is actually quite far from the truth, yet I've seen the same contrived ignorance within the pages of more than one supposedly scholarly book.  That explains why so many myths surrounding the topic of slavery are being perpetuated online, these days.  People are uneducated to the full truth of the problem.  The government and the "elite" [ie the unjustly entitled] would like to distract us all from the fact, that they currently have all of us 'commoners' -- whom they have labelled "outsiders" -- committed to the harshest forms of severe bondage.  The problem with the slavery we now experience [besides that slavery is just wrong in the first place], is that it's 1] involuntary and 2] undeclared.)
(I'm sure this may be applied to the study of democracy.)
("The US calls for more scientists; yet, there are no science jobs to be found... typical.)
(His critique of academics.)


I saw this letter to our local newspaper editor (published July 19, 2012), and thought it worthy of quoting here, since it beautifully expounds of my own feeings concerning Corporatism:

"Lies and Job Creators"
Re: Investment in Infrastructure Needed

Corporate speech produces the most ridiculous lies.  Gov. Mitt Romney supporters claim American taxes cause Bain Capital to outsource jobs to foreign countries.  Everyone knows they're lying because low wages in China is the reason.

Evading taxes is the reason more corporate offices and incomes move to off-shore tax havens.  It is only made possible by the havens and loopholes they paid to create.

I am weary of the obvious lie that "business creates jobs."  They don't.  Business takes money from existing economies and their success depends on doing it cheaper than their competitiors; their incentive is to destroy rather than create jobs.  A business manager who hires more people than needed is replaced by a better job-destroying manager.  Managerial bonuses are based on cost-cutting.  The lowest hanging fruit is payroll costs.  Less hours of work, lower pay and fewer jobs.

Jobs are created by investment into economic infrastructure that increases productive power and makes production of our needs cheaper; infrastructure that lowers the price of energy and raw materials and raises the value of real property.

An early example is the post roads developed by the U.S. Post Office that were actually farm to market development.  New York's Erie Canal raised commodity prices and property values for producers in the west while reducing the price of commodities and manufacturing in New York City.  The transcontinental railroad, the Homestead Act and agricultural colleges are other examples of early economic development by investing infrastructure.

While President John F. Kennedy attempted to continue America's exceptional progress, he was only successful in expanding NASA.  Eisenhower's interstate highway and freeways project, the last intentional American job creator, ended in th e1970s and good industrial jobs and good wages have been replaced by low paying service jobs ever since.

Job creation is a government function.  While it's possible for a corporation to create jobs, they lack the ability and incentive to invest in necessary 50 or 60 year projects.  Nor would anyone expect them to make investments from which the stockholders would not likely profit in their lifetime.

Check online for North American Water and Power Authority (NAWAPA) that could restore our economy and America's confidence.

I wish politicians would quit telling lies and create some jobs.

(Mel Logan)


He voices a very timely concern among many Americans.  No American should ever lack the income needed for basic survival, at least.  No American should ever be in danger of homelessness, starvation, or preventable, easily curable diseases.  We should have near 100% employment at all times.  However, we need to think outside of the box.  Instead of relying on government to "create" jobs for citizens, the best solution would be to abolish Corporatism immediately, since granting groups and organizations more Rights and Freedoms than Individuals is unConstitutional anyway.  In fact, Individual Rights are being violated by our economic system, as it has been designed by Congress.  The whole System is wrong.

However Zeitgeist, seductive as it is with its pseudo rationalism, is not the answer.  It's simply another trap designed to fleece every one of us.

(The full movie)
(Or you can watch it here, on their own very slick website.)

This movie has all the earmarks of a Hollywood production, the way it was promoted, the mystery and controversy surrounding it.  The narrator (who takes full credit for the ideas presented therein), Peter Joseph, goes by a pseudonym.  His real name is Peter Joseph Merola.  His brother, Eric Merola, once worked with Michael Moore on a movie or two.  The whole Zeitgeist Movie in fact reads exactly like a Michael Moore production -- and I believe that is actually what it really is.  At the height of its controversy, I pointed that out to Zeitgeist fanatics, and although they would argue vehemently for their economic philosophy -- not one of them would deny that Michael Moore had anything to do with it.

Peter Joseph Merola with Michael Laitman, a Kabbalist.

Jared Loughner, one of Zeitgeist's most devoted fans.  It is claimed by some, that Loughner's mother is Jewish; in fact she supposedly attended the same synagogue as Gabrielle Giffords, the main target of Loughner's massacre in Tucson, Arizona.  Arizona is Janet Napolitano's state (she has, or had, a home there; and was Governor of that state at one time) and one that is oft-visited by the internet hacker, Andrew Auernheimer (himself a Mason or wannabe initiate).  The Feds made the Tucson Massacre an open-and-shut case, with Loughner taking the full rap for it.  Notice his sloped forehead and very prominent brow; he also appears to be blue-eyed.  His skull looks brachycephalic, to me.  I've noticed quite a few Jewish "mass-murderers" in recent American history, yet none of those crimes are ever labelled "terrorism", by the 'authorities'.  Not one American assassination plot has ever been proven by law enforcement, to have been any sort of conspiracy.

A lurid photo of the red hair-dyed James Holmes, with a hired 'girlfriend'.  He loves techno-pop music, aspires to be a 'scientist', and can't get a real girlfriend... Yes, I believe he must be Jewish (whether by blood or by religion, remains to be seen).  His eyes often appear very dark in photos, as here, yet he actually has blue eyes.  So, probably Ashkenazi.  It's been reported that Holmes had seen a Colorado University psychiatrist just shortly before his rampage.

Portrayed by the Media as an active "Christian", James Holmes is really as I suspected: A Jew.  I've noticed a strange trend lately, of terroristic types of Jews pretending to be Christians.  Another case in point:  Andrew Auernheimer, who now claims to be a converted Mormon (yet another mind cult).

This article states that the psychiatrist, Dr. Lynne Fenton (another Jewish surname, by the way), was reprimanded by Colorado authorities for prescribing prescription drugs for herself, her husband and an employee.  She has very strange eyes and that 'horsey mouth' (lots of gums showing when she smiles) that you often see among the Hybrids.

She looks high as a kite, in this photograph.  The eyes are very beady, and oddly shaped (somewhat Mongoloid).  Also, they're extremely close-set (both pupils fall within the corners of her mouth).  She has the recessive earlobes, and like Kate Middleton (who otherwise seems physically perfect), the horsey, gummy smile; and I would expect to see a number of other recessive traits in this individual.  I wouldn't be surprised if she has Rh- bloodtype, banana thumbs, etc.

It's ironic that the Citizen's Committee on Human Rights has been linked to Scientology, in view of the fact that Scientology is itself a mind cult.  Lmao.  However if that's true, they make a good point regardless.  I totally agree that psychiatry, which is mostly Freudian, is dreadfully in-Humane.  While there have been a handful of really great psychologists, the good ones have mostly been ignored or even persecuted by the mainstream.

Freud was a misogynist; he spent nearly his entire career analyzing the psyches of women, yet in the end all he could say was that he still couldn't figure out "what women want".  We want our men to love, accept and value us for who and what we really are, that's all.  However, now that I have a deeper understanding of what most men are in reality -- it makes perfect sense to me that we don't easily connect, mentally or emotionally.  Nor even spiritually...

Knowing that years ago, would've had life-changing consequences for me.  I probably would've become a near hermit or recluse (as I am now, practically).  I might've been far more selfish, self-centered, self-preserving, defensive.  More self-reliant, self-sufficient.  Less optimistic; less trusting.  Less needful of companionship, less desirous of having my own family.  I probably wouldn't have ever had children (though I can't help but love mine, anyway -- maternal instinct).  Oh, I still talk to people all the time, whenever I leave the house (that's the only way to learn certain things), but my attitude is way different now.  I'm no less idealistic or happy, however (in fact the truth sets you free and clears up a lot of confusion); while I will admit it's a bit of a disappointment, fairly alienating and a little difficult to adjust.  There are just some rather commonly held expectations and preconceptions which I realize are no longer valid.


Most of the following text is from Carlos Castaneda's book, "A Separate Reality", his second one on the subject of the teachings of a Yacqui Indian shaman, don Juan Matus:

Don Juan: "... our lot as men is to learn, for good or bad..."

CC: "How does an ally look to you, don Juan? Those three people I saw, for instance, who looked like ordinary people to me; how would they look to you?"

DJ: "They would look like ordinary people."

CC: "Then how can you tell them apart from real people?"

DJ: "Real people look like luminous eggs when you 'see' them. Nonpeople always look like people. That's what I meant when I said you cannot 'see' an ally. The allies take different forms. They look like dogs, coyotes, birds, even tumbleweeds, or anything else. The only difference is that when you 'see' them they look just like what they're pretending to be. Everything has its own way of being when you 'see'. Just like men look like eggs, other things look like something else, but the allies can be seen only in the form they are portraying. That form is good enough to fool the eyes, our eyes, that is. A [real] dog is never fooled, neither is a crow."

CC: "Why would they want to fool us?"

DJ: "I think we are all clowns. We fool ourselves. The allies just take the outward appearance of whatever is around and then we take them for what they are not. It is not their fault that we have taught our eyes only to look at things."

CC: "I'm not clear about their function, don Juan. What do allies do in the world?"

DJ: "This is like asking me what we men do in the world. I really don't know. We are here, that's all. And the allies are here like us; and maybe they have been here before us."

CC: "What do you mean before us, don Juan?"

DJ: "We men have not always been here."

... DJ: "In the company of men they behave like men. In the company of animals they behave like animals. Animals are usually afraid of them; however, if they are accustomed to seeing the allies, they leave them alone. We ourselves do something similar. We have scores of allies among us, but we don't bother them. Since our eyes can only look at things, we don't notice them."

CC: "Do you mean that some of the people I see in the street are not really people?

DJ: "Some of them are not... Why must you think that every person in a moving crowd is a human being?"

Then CC continues the narrative: I really could not explain why, except that I was habituated to believe that as an act of sheer faith on my part... He (DJ) went on to say how much he liked to watch busy places with a lot of people, and how he would sometimes 'see' a crowd of men who looked like [luminous] eggs, and among the mass of egg-like creatures he would spot one who looked just like a person.

DJ: "It's very enjoyable to do that, or at least it's enjoyable for me. I like to sit in parks and bus depots and watch. Sometimes I can spot an ally right away; at other times I can 'see' only real people..."

So there are two kinds of people: the real (authentic) ones, and those which are not.
At this point, CC asked a series of questions about the "allies" (ie, the creatures pretending to be Human beings), including whether or not DJ had ever seen them do things, like drive vehicles.

"Then he [DJ] explained that the allies could not take the lead or act upon anything directly; they could, however, act upon man in an indirect way. Don Juan said that coming in contact with an ally was dangerous because the ally was capable of bringing out the worst in a [real] person. The apprenticeship was long and arduous, he said, because one had to reduce to a minimum all that was unnecessary in one's life, in order to withstand the impact of such an encounter."

Then DJ described injuries received by himself and his own "benefactor" (or mentor), during altercations with specific "allies" which mysteriously pretend to be real people.

The reason I quoted this, is because I believe it is of utmost importance; I wish that I'd fully understood it years ago, the first time I read it. Or better yet, that someone had warned me of these creatures which look and behave just like "real" people.

The fact is, they are only ~real in the sense that they are tangible, concrete; some can even drive cars (but watch out, many of them don't drive very well); some can speak Human languages, but again: not very well... Still, they're not Human beings, not People -- at least not in the correct definition of the word. Their DNA is entirely different from that of Human DNA, because they're Hybrids. They are no more "real" people, than mules are "real" ~horses. They ~"look" a lot like people, but they're not authentic.

And since I don't have the kind of skill to 'see' their energy fields the way that don Juan was capable of doing, I had to figure it all out on my own, using different methods to arrive at the same conclusion. Yet, because I've been studying the 'situation' for many years now, and due to certain experiences I've somehow survived, I believe I know at least a little bit more about the nature of the "Beast" than even don Juan himself. But, it's very comforting to me, to know that he was on the right track about it.

CC: I asked him if they were ghosts, spirits, or the souls of dead people. His reply was that he did not know what ghosts, spirits, and souls were... I translated for him the Webster's New World Dictionary definition of the word ghosts: "The supposed disembodied spirit of a dead person, conceived of as appearing to the living as a pale, shadowy apparition." And then the definition of spirit: "A supernatural being, especially one thought of... as a ghost, or as inhabiting a certain region, being of a certain (good or evil) character."... He [DJ] said they could perhaps be called spirits, although the definition I had read was not quite adequate to describe them.

CC: "Are they guardians of some sort?"

DJ: "No. They don't guard anything."

CC: "Are they overseers? Are they watching over us?"

DJ: "They are forces, neither good nor bad, just forces a brujo learns to harness."

CC: "Are they the allies, don Juan?"

DJ: "Yes, they are the allies of a man of knowledge."

CC: That was the first time in eight years of our association that don Juan had come close to defining an "ally."

At this point, CC engages DJ in a conversation designed to distinguish the various sorts of "allies" known to don Juan. It quickly becomes apparent through the text that "ally", to don Juan, actually means something like "tool", rather than the usual, common definition of the word, which most people think of as being like "friend" or social/military "partner".
In other passages of the Castaneda books, don Juan gives further hints to the character of the so-called "allies".  He explains that the elder shamans often attempted to manipulate certain "allies", knowing full well (thanks to their psychic vision) that they were not "real" Human beings.  Such experiments often ended disasterously for the shamans, however.  Don Juan described scars on both his benefactor's (mentor's) body and on his own, from injuries received at the hands of very violent "allies" which they had encountered.

“The shamans of ancient Mexico gave the name allies to inexplicable forces that acted upon them. They called them allies because they thought they could use them to their heart’s content, a notion that proved nearly fatal to those shamans, because what they called an ally is a being without corporeal essence that exists in the universe. Modern-day shamans call them inorganic beings."

UPDATE:  Some people (online) have argued with me concerning the tangible, physical nature of the so-called, "allies".  Some believe they are not actual physical forms, due to the appellation, "inorganic beings", which confuses them.  People who are unable to understand the language and context in the communications of a Native American shaman (ie don Juan Matus), unfortunately take that particular phrase too literally, thinking it means the beings are not real, flesh-and-blood types.

But they're wrong about that, and if they would read ALL of Castaneda's books, they would understand perfectly well that at least many of those mysterious creatures called "allies" in his texts are indeed real flesh-and-blood beings, not ghosts or anything more supernatural.  And they would know that despite the fact that the "allies" are not normal, true Human beings, they nevertheless appear to be so, to the untrained eye.  In his book, Fire From Within, he clearly describes them as "inorganic living beings".  That may sound contradictory and illogical to people who can't grasp the concept of soul-less humanoids, but it makes perfect sense to me.

Also, I would like to add that psychologist Stan Gooch wrote some very interesting books on the subject of Neanderthals.  While I don't agree 100% with his theories in their entirety, I do believe he was on the right track, and that his work is worth studying.
(More esoterical sources, often used by Freemasons; John Dee, Giordano Bruno, etc.).
(Talmudic studies, by a prominent Jewish rabbi.  "Bestiality", "Homosexuality", and "Hermaphroditism" is covered here, along with other relevant subjects, ie "Gentiles").
(Haven't had much time to really study this site; however, apparently this writer is another truth-seeker like myself, on the subject of Israel vs Judah).
(Here, he discusses the heraldic connotations implied in our country's original 'great seal'.  It is unfortunate that our country has since been successfully, politically, spiritually, psychologically and materially hijacked by the Jews -- ie Freemasons.  This they did, by confusing people into believing that they actually represent all of Israel:  but they don't, obviously.  They only represent Judah, Benjamin, and the Cohenim, or false priesthood.  They also represent the various Hybrids, the Beastly components of Earth's population.)
(I'm descended from the tribe of Dan, through my father.  For some inexplicable reason, and I believe wrongly, Dan was deliberately left out of the end-times prophecies in the book of Revelation.  I believe the reason it was left out is because Jewish scribes feared the powerful tribe of Dan, which is called the "Judge" in old biblical scriptures.  Judah and Dan were long-time enemies, back when Israel became divided in civil war during ancient times.)
Another Jewish radical with ties to mind cults (in particular, Mormonism and Islam):  Andrew Auernheimer.  His internet tyranny on the Amazon Religion Forum was one of the main catalysts (besides my becoming ill after my VA pre-employment physical at station number 666 in Sheridan, Wyoming) for me to research my DNA, which oddly enough led to my deepening interest in the phenomenon of Freemasonry and the Illuminati... and, to my discoveries regarding Human hybridization with lower Primates such as Apes and/or Monkeys.  Finding out that he and his fiance, Janet Napolitano, are hermaphrodites (like their idol, Adolph Hitler), simply added more depth to the story.  And to top it all off: he's a Freemason / Illuminati wannabee, too.
He has a history of terrorizing intelligent women.
Loves publicity; has been the subject of several media articles (including the one in the NY Times, several years ago).
His trial testimony in Newark, New Jersey federal court (in the AT&T iPad hacking case).  He was convicted on both counts, and faces up to five (or ten, by some reports) years of prison, plus a fine of at least $250,000 (reportedly).  Maybe he can get someone else to take all that punishment for him (he got them to pay for his lawyers, etc.).
While out on bail from the iPad case, he (along with Napolitano and all the other sexual perverts, including Anderson Cooper and other high-profile individuals) fought me as I protested this ebook by Phillip Greaves.  I posted the thread which is the subject of this wikipedia article, under the name of Alethea (formerly MindCandy).  Greaves was also convicted in this case.  So, sometimes there is at least some justice in America.
Clearly, he has 'banana thumbs', a Hybrid trait.
On their website homepage, they don't mention the fact that it is station number 666 there.
Nor does this.
However, here on this official government document, station numbers 666 in Wyoming are listed on pages 80-81 and 84.
I know it seems crazy, but I have good reasons to believe that this YouTube channel is somehow connected to our American Government, and to the Sheridan VA Medical Center in particular.  They showed up on my radar, around the time of the Tucson Massacre.  I also learned around the same time, that "Dr. Pepper" is a code for them (the Illuminati), for "Medical Hitman".  Pimiento is Spanish for "Pepper".  Their original channel was shut down for 'bad behavior' (ie Trolling, etc.); but, they just whipped up another one with a similar name to take its place.

I had a link for a "Dr. Pepper Hitman" with connections to Brazil (notice the YouTube channel above claims to be located in Valencia, Spain)... I have to find it again; it's buried pretty deep in my information files, I'm sure.  "Dr. Pepper" also seems to have some kind of appeal to homosexuals and pedophiles, judging from some other links I've found (one of them possibly connected to Janet Napolitano, wherein she collects photographs of small boys holding cans of DP soda, supposedly for an online "contest" of some sort).
(Here it is: "Cute Boys and Dr. Pepper"... hmm.)
Joe Biden's "Dr. Pepper" faux pas, which I don't believe was a real 'mistake' at all.  It seems rather to me, that he along with his Illuminati buddies are mocking US citizens with that very crass, 'sick joke'.
Deviant Art website, of which Andrew Auernheimer is also closely connected (he may be its founder, in fact) has many "entries" into a "Dr. Pepper Contest", too.  Some users have "666" in their online handles, and most appear to have homosexual tendencies, judging by their choices of names.

Even more interesting, Amazon's Mei Mei (whom I call Me! Me!, and who hosts her own public-private discussion thread in the Christianity forum where she plays the part of an innocent, crippled Mormon girl and flirts with her fiance, Andrew Auernheimer / Weev and their Nazi and Bureaucratic friends) stated that her favorite beverage is:  why, Dr. Pepper, of course.  "Mei Mei" is Chinese for, "Little Sister"... Of course, Janet Napolitano is well-known in the Media by her nickname, "Big Sister".
("Sacred underwear"?  I find that quite bizarre.)
(A link to just one of many Treehouse threads.)
(This thread looks like some kind of propaganda or spinning, ie deceitful, activity.  Psy-ops is a major activity on Amazon's forums.  They ban people like me for expressing my personal religious and political opinions; yet host forums for things like S&M, Bondage, Zionists and Nazis.)
(This is what happens when you google "Mei Mei".)
(Footage from the dedication of the New Mexico University's new Anatomy Lab, in honor of Leonard Napolitano, Janet's father.  I believe his keen interest in anatomy stems from the fact that his daughter, like her fiance, Andrew Auernheimer, is a hermaphrodite.  I have good reasons to believe that she is in fact more of a male than a female, and that making her a girl was actually an unfortunate mistake caused by the lack of data during those times when she was an infant.  Janet was present here, at her father's honors ceremony.)

I found this illustration by reknowned Kansas City Star artist, Dale Beronius, in a 1930 book on anatomy called, The Human Body, by Logan Clendening.

I found Michael Bradley and Eric Hufschmid through this site. This guy (like most of them) is possibly trolling for the Illuminati.)
This blogger states criticisms and other opinions about Rick Potvin, for a more balanced view of his politics.
Another source I found through Potvin's website.  Eric Hufschmid is linked through that site, too.
Good post.
Cryonics Cafeteria, wtf?  Huh?  Lol.
Very strange, indeed.
This YouTuber is associated with DeviantArt... Andrew Auernheimer.  Hmm.

(More info, more theories.)

Evil Talmudic religious leaders... Their several official websites are easily Googled.
Evil, barbaric Noahide laws created by the Talmudic priesthood.
"The seven laws listed by the Tosefta and the Talmud are[7]
  1. Prohibition of Idolatry
  2. Prohibition of Murder
  3. Prohibition of Theft
  4. Prohibition of Sexual immorality
  5. Prohibition of Blasphemy
  6. Prohibition of eating flesh taken from an animal while it is still alive
  7. Establishment of courts of law [Remember the related Vehmic Court, with all of its secrecy.]

"The Talmud laid down the statutory punishment for transgressing any one of the Seven Laws of Noah (but not other parts of the Noahide code) as capital punishment [23] by decapitation, which is considered one of the lightest[24] of the four modes of execution of criminals.  According to some opinions, punishment is the same whether the individual transgresses with knowledge of the law or is ignorant of the law."[25]
Ashley Montagu's Anthropology book, in full text online. (He was born, "Israel Ehrenberg", and is the author of a grade-school Sociology textbook in my possession.)  His Introduction to Anthropology was published by Osmania University press, in India.
"The Osmania University is a public state university located in Hyderabad, India, founded in 1908. It was established and named after the last Nizam of Hyderabad, Mir Osman Ali Khan. It is one of the oldest modern universities in India."  [Wikipedia]

So once again, another Jew with ties to Vedic, Aryan India; who has a keen interest in racial matters, ethnicity, eugenics, and genocide... and who changed his name to make himself appear to be more "European" (ie Caucasoid).  As I've pointed out before, Aryans are not pure Caucasoids, but are instead mixed with Mongoloid and lower Primate DNA.

UPDATE: The text actually was printed in the USA (my mistake), but not by any university apparently, although it cites Montagu as being a professor at Rutgers. The book was actually found in a collection at the Osmania University library, instead.

Professor Montagu wrote the above linked textbook on the subject of Physical Anthropology in 1945 (during WWII and Hitler's reign).  Like most Hybrids, he collects knowledge and facts; and like most of them, he also distorts and / or exagerates the truth.
Some basic facts from the admittedly biased source, Wikipedia.

He also wrote a Sociology textbook in my possession, called The World's Social Structure (singular, as if there is or should be only one type of global social structure), c1963 by Esco Publishing Co.  It is a picture book for grade-schoolers, featuring Mid-century Era printing technology and the modernist, minimalist artistic style of the time.  It is part of a series called The International Pictorial Treasury of Knowledge, and is sponsored by the International Graphic Society of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

The title page shows a barren landscape on which strides a naked man with pitch-black skin, wearing a winged helmet like the god, Mercury's; his right forefinger pointed significantly heavenward, his left arm cradling a staff entwined with two serpents and topped with yet another set of disembodied wings (like the American Medical Association's logo).  Another wing adorns his left ankle.  Other symbolism on the title page includes a set of scales (Law and Justice), a Royal sceptor embellished with a heart (Blood), and a plow (work, labor, slavery, serfdom).  The author discusses the subject of Slavery under the category of Labor.

On the subject of Justice there is shown a rather large guillotine, among other things...  On the subject of Education, under the subcategory of Law, there is shown a smaller guillotine right next to a tiny representation of a child being forcibly removed from its mother by a man dressed in Arab garb, wearing a turban, 'harem pants', a tunic, a beard... and holding the crescent-shaped Arabic sword (scimitar or saber).  He holds the naked child upside down by one foot, while the mother is on her knees with arms upraised as if pleading for the child's life.  Even more curious is the fact that the man has yellow (Mongoloid), the baby pink (Caucasoid), and the assumed mother black (Negroid) skins.  A very bizarre racial inference, there.
"On 10 October 1789, Doctor Joseph-Ignace Guillotin, a French physician, stood before the National Assembly and proposed the following six articles in favour of the reformation of capital punishment:
  • Article 1: All offences of the same kind will be punished by the same type of punishment irrespective of the rank or status of the guilty party.
  • Article 2: Whenever the Law imposes the death penalty, irrespective of the nature of the offence, the punishment shall be the same: decapitation, effected by means of a simple mechanism.
  • Article 3: The punishment of the guilty party shall not bring discredit upon or discrimination against his family.
  • Article 4: No one shall reproach a citizen with any punishment imposed on one of his relatives. Such offenders shall be publicly reprimanded by a judge.
  • Article 5: The condemned person's property shall not be confiscated.
  • Article 6: At the request of the family, the corpse of the condemned man shall be returned to them for burial and no reference to the nature of death shall be registered."
" the twinkling of an eye..."
I don't know whether he was Jewish or not, but I would guess, "yes".
The French Revolution was nothing like the American one; it was far more brutal and barbaric.
The last person to be guillotined in France (1977) was a Tunisian whose French girlfriend complained he had pimped her out for money, etc.  In retalitation, he sexually tortured and then killed her.
A write-up on the subject of "humane capital punishment", by members of the medical establishment, with government sanctioning, sponsorship and approval.
Freemasons are also interested in the man, and in the subject of capital punishment by beheading.  This write-up is listed under the categories of Famous Freemasons and Masonic Biographies.

Personally, I don't believe for a moment that beheading is by any means in the least "humane".  It seems very sadistic to me.  And I find it interesting that a doctor invented the device, in lieu of the present activities of doctors in their roles as free-lancing (so to speak) eugenicists and hitmen.  If doctors know how to heal and preserve life, they also know how to destroy it with methods that might go undetected by common laymen (or, by "commoners" -- since doctors are among the elite).  Also interesting is the fact that so many internet trolls who seek to curb the Free Speech of US citizens, joke openly about themselves being hitmen, mercenaries -- and about their preference for various forms of capital punishment.

Capital:  From Middle English, principal; from Old French, from Latin capitalis, from caput, head, money laid out; see kaput - in Indo-European roots.
Jerome Corsi, Harvard PhD journalist, discussing the connections between Pimiento 666 (aka Dr. Pepper), Jared Loughner, and the Tucson Massacre.

Anyway, other troll icons which stand for capital punishment are 1) egg salad (Humpty Dumpty), 2) cole slaw (which comes from a head of cabbage, get it?), 3) cheetos (a reference to "pot-heads"), etc..
I don't know much about LaRouche, just learned about him recently from Rick Potvin's blog.  Keep in mind however, that the Protocols call for using "antisemitism" to their advantage.  I say, there is a huge difference between valid criticism and "hate speech".  Is Potvin a closet Jew?  A crypto-Jew?  Maybe, I'm not sure.  He criticizes William of Orange (Protestant co-regent of England), and I gather he was raised Catholic, but is Jewish through his maternal lineage.  I gather he is an adoptee.  His interest in Cryonics is a red flag, too.  He admits using "spin" techniques, which to me is like saying he's an accomplished liar.  And, he is a regular on Godlike Productions -- another red flag, because that's an Illuminati, Masonic site.  Ah well, that's how you learn... you've got to go out on a limb sometimes.,oilpastels/Interesting
(Still searching for the Brazilian Dr. Pepper / hitman cartoon.  Ran across these interesting sites while doing so.)
The video Napolitano didn't want you to see.  It seemed at the time, she tried to prevent me from posting it, but I'm not sure.
Napolitano's YouTube channel, and video she posted for her fiancee, the troll known as "Loki" (Andrew Auernheimer).

"io li odio nazisti dell illinois" she says, on her channel homepage.  Last activity was four days ago, Dec. 4, 2012.  Translated from the Italian language, it means, "I hate them Nazis of Illinois."

That's the google translator version, anyway (a very literal translation).  In plain, regular English it would read, "I detest those Illinois Nazis."  She of all people ought to know that Obama and his political cronies from Chicago are Nazis... most of her best buddies are, after all.

Notice that you don't see much positive publicity about Napolitano in the media; it's mostly negative criticism about her being called onto Congressional carpet for questionning about various official improprieties.
Another Italian YouTuber, possibly connected to Napolitano (she was the first one to comment on the above linked video), and most likely a troll (judging by her channel, and the fact that her comment was flagged down for its inappropriate message).
Found this link on Rick Potvin's blog.
"Watch Out for Infiltrators and Instigators."
I've caught on to Coast to Coast AM's modus operandi... Whenever they try to embarass a guest, I know that guest is an honest, intelligent person.

George Noory, Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh, David Icke, and other fabulously wealthy, successful, self-proclaimed "truthers" / media whores are all fake, phony.  Can you spell, "PROPAGANDA"?
The things you learn, from the internet.
The author is himself of Jewish descent, and converted to Judaism.
The Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rebbe Schneersohn, was rescued from Hitler's eugenics program by -- a Nazi soldier.  Too many "coincidences".  According to the author, it was an "Aryanized Jewish soldier".  The author's own family were in denial about their Jewish ancestry; and it was nearly forgotten.

Further blurring the distinctions between Nazis / Aryans and Jews / Neanderthal Hybrids.
Feuding, infighting amongst the trolls.
Author claims she was recently cyberstalked by a troll utilizing multiple online identities... let me guess:  Andrew Auernheimer.

"The law enforcement agents post the same types of hooks over and over. They post that there are no limits to the First Amendment and no permits needed. They outright propose specific violent actions. Most people have learned to ignore them and not even reply. The law enforcement agents simply move on to other pages and post trying to locate sympathizers there."

That's how I make the connection between law enforcement / Homeland Security, and Zionist trolls like Auernheimer.  I figured out they're all on the same team, all intend to destroy America, Americans.
Trolling is a preoccupation of both, criminals and our criminal "law enforcement" agencies.,64749,66062
A discussion on an anti-cult forum about Rick Potvin and his activities involving cryonics.  He's also very well established on Godlike Productions, a website which repeatedly bans non-paying members -- just because they can.
A Hegelian concept; a Masonic concept.
The very first thing the movie does, is attempt to smear, shatter, and discredit Christianity.  For that reason, it may be called anti-Christ.

I've mentioned before, but it bears repeating, that the guy who narrates the movie and takes credit for the whole production is only a frontman for Michael Moore.  He only read Moore's script for him, so that Moore could maintain anonymity.  Further, the narrator's brother was at least once or twice employed by Michael Moore in the business of film-making... so, the narrator has a definite connection to Moore.  The narrator claims to be a disenchanted Catholic (which is possible), but his real name is Jewish.

Here's a typical quote from a Freemason / Illuminati type individual; describing himself:  "Left-wing social engineering propagandist or right-wing corporate apologist. You decide."  (Hugh Briss, aka 'FoolishReporter').

Another deeply disturbed Illuminatist claims, "actually, most progress in the human condition has come through military conflict and slavery" (Andrew Aurenheimer, aka 'rabite').
This author pinpoints fairly well, what I've been noticing a lot lately:  the hypocrisy and straight-up dishonesty manifested by both corporate and governmental entities; and how they are reinforcing each other with very subtle and discreet support.
Andrew Auernheimer (internet troll / hacker and Freemason) is involved with this above-linked website; maybe its founder.  He refers to himself as a "pornographer", and for once he isn't lying.
This is one of the Tea House in a Treehouse threads from Amazon's Christianity forum, where Auernheimer and Me! Me! (Mei Mei, Little Sister, NBY, NB, FreetoChoose, various aliases, or real name Janet Napolitano) used to (or perhaps still do) hang out together.
Posted by "Princess Mei Mei:

Links to past Treehouses:

Teahouse in a Treehouse (Original):

Teahouse in a Treehouse And More (2nd):

Teahouse in a Treehouse Take Three:

Teahouse in a Treehouse Episode IV: A New Hope

Teahouse in a Treehouse Episode V: Amazon Strikes Back

Teahouse in a Treehouse Episode IV: Return of the Treeople

Teahouse in a Treehouse: 7th Haven

Teahouse in a Treehouse Episode VIII: The Treehouse Lives

His forum buddy, "Banner" ("from the German" language) I learned was actually Rush Limbaugh.  Anderson Cooper was also one of the flaming liberals of the discussion forums (he along with Napolitano and Auernheimer defended Philip Greaves, the pedophile author).
"Nazi T-Shirts... An article published in the Czech weekly Tyden in January 2008 called attention to shirts sold by Amazon which were emblazoned with "I Love Heinrich Himmler" and "I Love Reinhard Heydrich," professing affection for the infamous Nazi officers and war criminals. Patricia Smith, a spokeswoman for Amazon, told Tyden, "Our catalog contains millions of items. With such a large number, unexpected merchandise may get onto the Web." Smith told Tyden that Amazon does not intend to stop cooperating with Direct Collection, the producer of the T-shirts. Following pressure from the World Jewish Congress, Amazon announced that it had removed from its website the aforementioned T-shirts as well as "I love Hitler" T-shirts that they were selling for women and children. After the WJC intervention, other items such as a Hitler Youth Knife emblazoned with the Nazi slogan "Blood and Honor" were also removed from as well as a 1933 German SS Officer Dagger distributed by Knife-Kingdom."

Yet in the year 2010, I witnessed whole forums (not just threads alone) on Amazon, devoted to subjects such as "Nazi", "Bondage", and "S&M".

Suddenly, this shows up:  This is the same troll involved with the Tucson massacre somehow (government connections).  Their original channel was closed down and replaced by this one of a similar name.
I finally woke up, and tried google Brasil to find it... VOILA!

"not advisable to moralists and / or under 18. Alias​​, this blog is not advisable for anyone short daquie [ie slang for 'dick']"

"bad jokes and they are good"

Kind of like a Brazilian Encyclopedia Dramatica.

"When Dr. Pepper gets drunk, he gets happy; when Emos get drunk, they get sad; when Chuck Norris gets drunk, he gets mean."

"My wife died in childbirth, what should I do with our baby?"
"Drop-kick it."

The top one says, "To lower your dick, you need to circumcise it."
The patient then says, "I think not."
But, next time he's in the water, a shark carries out the doctor's orders anyway.

The second one is gay troll humor too:  The doctor scolds the patient (who is obviously sexually aroused), threatening to sue him for harassment and to shut down his website.  The doctor's friend says "You shouldn't send him away like that."

"Why not?"

"Because now he'll take the stick."

Here is Dr. Pepper looking kindly and serene, but ironically holding a large bloody knife behind his back.  On the main webpage for this trolling organization, is the classic logo of the Doctor being shielded from an assassin's bullet -- by the head of his patient.

Dr. Pepper (aka Pimiento) troll humor exemplifies the usual Masonic types:  sick, depraved, amoral, sexual, misogynistic, gay, violent.  My former boss, a professed 33 degree Mason (he even showed me his special Masonic Temple bible, with all of its references to demons, etc.) used to tell one nasty, 'blue' joke after another; all day long, even repeating his favorite ones.  His wife very proudly showed me the gift she bought him:  a painting of the Devil perched on a toilet with cigarette and martini.

Those people are possessed; psychopaths; and brainwashed by their evil cult religion.  Their worship of money, power and sex is what makes them so dangerous.  And it's the reason why Freemasonry is a problem of such broad scope; it has global implications.  They present themselves as a harmless fraternity, but it's much more than that -- a Secret Society.  One that has very nearly already destroyed Humanity, the Economy (natural resources, etc.), the Earth and everything in it.

It's a problem of such proportions, that I could have, should have probably, devoted an entire blog to it; but there's no time for that now.  The hour is late; something should have been done to correct the problem, a long time ago.  To allow them to continue their agenda unchecked, is inexcusable.  I'm just a simple, underprivileged woman, yet I can finally see through the lies to the truth of Mankind's situation.  Why can't enough Human beings wake up to reality, to preserve and protect our species?

SDS, Students for a Democratic Society published this copy of Herbert Marcuse's epilogue of Karl Marx's 18th Brumaire of Louis Napolean.  He speaks of Hegel and Orwel; it's all about social and political revolution.
A blogger with an Islamic point of view; I like to know how others are really thinking.
A UK blogger.
A Jewish / Zionist blogger who doesn't like Texe Marrs at all.
Pro-Anonymous; anti-Puritan.  A Catholic blogger.
My grandfather, John Sevier, first governor of Tennessee, was a "Democratic-Republican".  Our country is in fact a Democratic Republic.  Too bad people can't understand how the two are SUPPOSED to function TOGETHER.  They have split minds, along with their Hybrid personalities.
These are among just a few of the decidely weird websites associated with politicalvelcraft; who is also an avid Ron Paul idolator.
This is just one example of the intense gang bullying / stalking I endured on the Amazon discussion forums. (I was "Alethea", formerly known as "MindCandy", an allusion to my used book-selling account I once had there).
515 hits on "Alethea", just on the Religion forum alone; there were more on the Christianity and other forums I visited.  I finally realized these were Freemasons and their minions, who were attacking me.
In 1787, Freemasons met in secret and rewrote the original US Constitution (the Articles of the Confederation).  They hijacked our law, our country, our government and our lives.  Most American citizens have been drugged into submission with either pharmaceuticals or the sodium flouride in our tap water...  Nazi tactics of totalitarian control.

Another source tying in the connections between Zionism, Freemasonry, and Nazism / Fascism.  They've enslaved and brainwashed everyone, and not enough people are intelligent or strong enough to fight back against them.  I seriously question how much of our population is fully Human, and how much of it is actually subHuman, Neanderthal- Denisovan- Hybrids (ie the Beast of Revelation).

But I'm just a simple, impoverished, disadvantaged, powerless Human woman... no one listens to me.  I mourn the Earth, because the Beast is quickly laying it all to waste, including all Human life which depends on natural resources for survival.  The Beast is ravenous, greedy, ruthless and vicious.

From Jeremiah 31:27...37

"Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast...

"Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:

"Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:

"But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of *Israel*; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

"And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD:  for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD:  for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

"Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name:

"If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of *Israel* also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever.

"Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of *Israel* for all that they have done, saith the LORD."

Notice how the scriptures distinguish between "Israel" and "Judah"?  Judah is not Israel!!  God has sown the house of Judah with the seed of "beast" [ie subHuman seed or DNA], and He has sown the house of Israel with the seed of "man" [ie Human seed, or DNA].

Unfortunately, people have forgotten the difference between Judah and Israel.  The Jews have brainwashed everyone into believing the lie that they are the same entity.   They are not.  Judah and the ten tribes of Israel parted ways, a long, long time ago.  The Jews claim the ten tribes of Israel are "lost" -- another outrageous lie.  We must remember who we are, people.  The Jews are not God's chosen People.  The scriptures (READ it) state repeatedly that His People are Israel.

Jacob favored his son Joseph, and Joseph's sons, over his firstborn, Judah.  Ever since then, Judah has been conspiring and scheming to dominate and control what they consider to be their birthright according to the Patriarchal system of Progeniture.  They are greedy not only for the Levantine homelands, but now they seek to own the entire world, and to enslave everyone of us in it -- especially their former brothers, Israel.  But Judah and Israel no longer resemble each other enough to claim fraternity, because Jewish DNA has been irreparably corrupted by the Pagan sins of bestiality and fornication.

Not even the wise man speaking in the above linked video, 'gets' the fact that there is a real difference between Israel and Judah, or Jews!  The original Christians were Israelis, Hebrews, or as they later became known:  Jews.  Lots of confusion surrounding their / our history, so tragic.  Flavius Josephus chose between the Jewish sects of Pharisee, Saduccee, and Essene.  He chose to be a Pharisee.  Jesus was closely associated with the Essenes.
Patrick Henry ("Give me Liberty, or give me death!") was a strong critic of the 1787 Constitutional Convention.

"He was in favor of the strongest possible government for the individual states, and a weak federal government. He was also very critical of the fact that the convention was conducted in secret."

By the way, I once spent the night in the Hanover, Virginia, inn, where Patrick Henry was said to have tended bar in the building's basement.  I attended a dinner theater there (Butterflies are Free).  I remember the meal was a very delicious shrimp and rice curry, lol!  Also, I enjoyed the comfort and ambiance of my room in the old place... I slept very well there.
I'm trying to figure out my ancestor's, Tennessee Governor / General John Sevier's, role in the 1787 Constitutional Convention, if any.  Surely he must have been involved somehow.  But then again, maybe not; because apparently Tennessee and / or Frankland were not counted among the thirteen original, official Colonies.

By the way, there is a State bureaucrat / internet blogger, who is running a smear campaign on John Sevier.  Gordon Belt is his name; and his wife, an alleged "ordained minister" has authored a book called, Onward Christian Soldiers, a supposed history of the Civil War, which is itself a smear against Christianity.
He calls it the Prosperity Project, but I'm not sure whose "posterity" he is working against (John Sevier's, or Tennessee's?), nor what his "project" goals are supposed to be there.  He's clearly just trash-talking, and one might assume he is either related to John Sevier's political arch-enemy, Andrew Jackson; or, he is simply yet another anti-American, Jewish, recent or late immigrant to our country, hellbent on destroying our Civil Rights and Liberty.

It's notable that these Illuminati, "elitist" types very often have organized "projects" going on.  And when I say "organized", I mean just that:  they are usually incorporated, allegedly not-for-profit groups with very defined (although never completely above-board, always veiled in secrecy and/or mystery) political, economic, religious, and social agendas.

But what is so enraging about Belt (besides the obvious monetary support he receive for his dirty 'work', from supposed private sources) is that he is a well paid State employee!  He is Tennessee's State Archivist / Historian.  The fox is guarding the henhouse, as is all too typical these days.
Another of their projects.
Andrew Jackson was a Freemason of the Tammany Lodge No. 1 in Tennessee. He waged political war on my sixth great-grandfather, John Sevier; and now Tennessee has an official, paid Historian (Gordon Belt) continuing the smear campaign against Sevier (200 years later, no less), who was Tennessee's first Governor and very popular with the citizenry of that state. It begs the questions: 1) Was or was not John Sevier himself, a Freemason? and 2) Is or is not Gordon Belt, a Freemason?

Because, it's fairly common knowledge these days, that Freemasonry has dominated US politics ever since around 1787, when they held the Federal Constitutional Congress in secrecy.  Thomas Paine, Dr. Benjamin Rush and Patrick Henry, three of our most respectable founding fathers, spoke out in opposition to that legal maneuver, and I wonder now where Sevier stood on that controversy.  I would guess that he was not completely in favor of it.
This article on the Overton Lodge in Tennessee, mentions both John Sevier and Andrew Jackson by name; however, although it describes Jackson as a Freemason, it does not say the same about Sevier. I would not be at all surprised to learn that my great-grand-daddy, John Sevier, a very fine gentleman (far better than Andrew Jackson, any day) -- was not a Freemason.
Couldn't find John Sevier here, but it's only an abstract; however, when googled this came up.
A Tennessee Lodge is named for John Sevier, but that's not too surprising.
Ok, I guess this finally settles it for me; John Sevier was not too surprisingly a Freemason... He's listed here, in 10,000 Famous Freemasons, Vol. 3.  I have yet to find him listed as a member on any official Masonic site, however.  Maybe they outcasted him, lol.
This brief Lodge History also claims John Sevier was a Mason.  So, maybe he was.
A history buff who calls himself 'Spartacus', lol.
Search results for "mtDNA X."
I think that it's quite safe to say that practically all internet trolls and hackers are Satanist elitists, and most of them have definite connections to either Corporations or Government.
Most foreign language internet pages are easily translated automatically, with just a click, via Bing; but it appears this one has been blocked.
While researching Pimiento 666, I discovered this website dedicated to Hitler, wherein he is referred to as, Black Sun 666.  There are pages at this site which denigrate Christianity with outright hate propaganda.
Like Encyclopedia Dramatica and other trolling organizations, Pimiento 666 stores a number of ditties which they use in their mocking parodies, etc.
Satanic culture is truly bizarre, downright puerile.
Anyway, although John Sevier might have been a Freemason, I've yet to find him mentioned on any of their official lists of "famous" or "prominent" Masons.  That's pretty strange, considering that his arch-foe, Andrew Jackson is on all the lists.  Sure, Sevier never became President (never ran for office, to my knowledge) but he was first (and six times) Governor of Tennessee, a judge, and a Congressional Representative.  If he was a Freemason, why isn't he listed?  I can only conclude that they 'disowned' him and sided with Andrew Jackson politically.  If so, that makes me even more proud of my ancestor.
I have a children's picture book printed back in the 1970's (by Hallmark, if I remember correctly), which indoctrinates little boys into Freemasonry, with its emphasis on the worship of money and with Masonic symbolism. There is also an implicit homosexual element to the story, via its illustrations.
A YouTube clip of the incident in Monterrey, Mexico.
Sheesh, I ran up against one of these today; a full blown psycho, bragging that he's a "minister" with full legal rights to perform "ceremonies" and that he "belongs" to a "church".  A Zeitgeist proponent who hypocritically bashes me for being a "Christian", because he assumes too much based on that label.  My whole point in my comment was that Jesus was not a mythical figure (as Michael Moore's Zeitgeist script reads), but a documented real live historical figure.  This snake calling himself GordosMama1111 spent nearly a day dancing around the real issues. Disgusting, repulsive.
I'm cloisterene there...
I just learned today, about another of their hokey fraternities:  the Social Order of the Beauceant.  Sounds very important, doesn't it?  LMAO.
Holy shit, I found their den.
Daughters of the Nile; their name is LEGION.
Sorry, but these kinds of fraternal organizations are all so very gay.
John Sevier is barely mentioned on the Grand Lodge of Tennessee's website, while they proudly boast of his arch political foe, Andrew Jackson, being a "Famous Freemason".  What's up with that?  Was or was he not a Freemason?  If he was, why do they shun him now?  What was Sevier's attitude and opinions about the Constitution of 1787?  I need to know these things about my sixth great-grandfather.

Ok, getting back to the subject of subHuman Hybrids' infiltration of Government:

This ancient Ludite(? not sure I heard the narrator correctly) Disk is elaborately diagrammed in bas relief, on both sides of the stone.

Beginning at 47:37 the Embryological / Genetical Disk from Colombia is explained. Immediately following that explanation, he shows the audience a knife and another medical instrument called a 'spoon', both used specifically for childbirth. The knife was used to cut umbilical cords; the 'spoon' was used in transverse or breech presentations, to help remove infants from mothers' wombs. All three items are finely crafted from the mineral, Ludite. The narrator points out the strange configuration of the faces / heads of some of the creatures shown on the Disk. No one can understand why they look so different from normal Humans, but I believe I know the answer: they are actually subHuman, Lower Primates (such as Monkeys or Apes). I believe this stone is evidence of ancient experiments in Human / Ape Hybridization, and that it was created as a sort of textbook reference for their priests, doctors, etc.

The Illuminati are also very interested in the subject of breeding, eugenics, of course.

More pictures of the "Genetical Disk" are posted on my other blog article here.

Science does not support the Aryan Invasion of India theory.  It's dizzying, how much all of my interests overlap this way.  I guess that's the essential nature of knowledge:  everything interconnects somehow.

Found this just today (same day that I posted the photos of the Disk above).  It shows a figure identical to the ones on the Disk which I believe to be that of Monkeys or Apes.

Prince Hall Grand Lodge.

Another synchronicity; I see a gorgeous brand spanking new pure white Jeep this morning, with the vanity tag "KGC" on it and a very evil looking woman driver (she parked, got out and came near enough for me to see her eyes -- not six feet away from where I was standing inside a store).  Then just a little while later, while watching a YouTube video that was recommended to me by an acquaintance, I learn what "KGC" actually means:  Knights of the Golden Circle.

The Habsburg Most Illustrious Order of the Golden Fleece -- Its potential relevance on modern culture in the European Union, c2007?...Knights of the Order of the Golden Fleece, an elitist fraternity of Royals, "Hebrews", and Catholics.  The author, 'Glen Covert' is involved somehow.

"Founded in 1430... The Order has begun re-introducing itself to European society, first with the Feast Day celebration at Heiligenkreuz [Austria], then with the presentation of Das Haus Osterreich und der Orden vom Goldenen Vlies.  Both of these events can be considered proof that the Sovereign{? title, but no Human name] is moving ahead with his goal to bring the public, albeit in a limited way, closer to the Order, that is, to inform the public about its values and traditions [what they want us to know and believe about it, anyway].

Antiques at OZ, a website linked in the above article by Glen Covert, M.A., Hebrew Immigration Aid Society,

Website dedicated to Otto von Habsburg.  "Christ, Kaiser, European"... [handwritten] "Not some Human!"... so, a god?  LOL.

An Austrian YouTuber who posts mainly documentaries in German.

They wish to set the record straight.

Anderson Cooper spinning the Amazon "pedophilia controversy".
Phillip Greaves and his e-book.
Only Florida authorities had the moral rectitude to arrest the scumbag.
The clip of Anderson Cooper waxing poetic about "dolphins" while spinning the facts.  It keeps coming up "error, try again later"... and, it wouldn't surprise me if they cut out the "dolphin" comments.
The original report made by Anderson Cooper (the one I referred to) is mysteriously unavailable to view at this time.

"Neanderthal Anti-Defamation Association... Protecting The Ancient Serpent Bloodline from discrimination, harassment and speciesism."

From their own lips, to God's ears.  Proof that I am right:  the Neanderthals themselves admit to being of the Serpent Bloodline.  They think it something to be proud of, lol.

Blood and DNA is very much a part of all their Religions (or Cults).  At its core, it is Aryanism.

Strange perspective.

This is the sort of fiction that is popular these days:

"Tiger works to give his people a better, safer life and has no desire to take a mate. He watches his friends fall for human females and he is clueless to the allure. The universe is testing his determination in the form of a beautiful female who calls him Angel.

"Zandy thought she was a two-time loser in the marriage department and now spends her days avoiding men. Unfortunately she proves she is definitely a three-time loser when she falls for a man determined to be just a friend with benefits.

"Tiger discovers fighting the urges of the animal part of his genetics is becoming more difficult and he begins to wonder why he was fighting instincts at all. Before he can tell her how he feels he is injured and a misunderstanding drives Zandy away. Tiger learns he not only drove his mate away but she has been taken by the enemy."
Typical YouTube Illuminati Troll channels.  "Fester" is interesting, in light of the fact that an Amazon Troll (Andrew Auernheimer, in fact) repeatedly and very cryptically referred to "Uncle Fester" shortly before Jared Loughner's infamous mugshot ever was published online.  That's just one of the several reasons why I believe Auernheimer and the Government (especially Janet Napolitano, Obama, and Holder) were behind the Tucson massacre.
Someone's been doing some serious research.
I googled, "Holy white mountain"... and this shit comes up.
Another very creepy website.
Maybe the "Holy White Mountain" is other than the one referred to in Colorado?  This one has a "Holy Spring" on it, it is rumored.

However, this is what first sprung to my mind, when I first heard about the Hopi / Mayan legend concerning a race of people creating a New World Order, hailing from a "holy white mountain"... Mt. Rushmore.

A Hoover Dam memorial.,_Ley_Line_and_Power_Points.html
???  Strange case.
Zakk... Simon Peter Schonhans... adopted by Stan Tull... Tulls Bay Marina.  Victim of Masonic / Anonymous gangstalking.  Their purpose and goal was to fleece this man of his inheritance, his personal property, his estate.  Like Satan himself, they use false accusations of insanity, etc, while literally attempting to drive him to insanity and ultimately to an untimely death.  Dead men don't talk, they make poor witnesses; dead men don't file, or win, lawsuits.
Weird, and reminiscent of the Vehmic Courts.
Very creepy.
"Troupe"... monkey and ape groups are also commonly called "troupes".
More mystery, very frustrating.

"SHEPHERDS:  These Savages stand guard over the food supply -- that food being the human herd from which vampires feed."

If you think the above is all just innocent games of the highly imaginative -- guess again.  They would not put so much effort and detail into it, if it were not a serious fetish for them...

Description: The Bloodline known as Streiter seems like something out of a late sixties to early seventies movie or nightmare. It's a gang of vampires, ghouls and some blood slaves with shaved head, jeans, thin suspenders, steel tipped combat or Doc Martens boots and bomber jacket or leather jackets--all mean-as-hell, tough, patriotic monsters with definite working-class attitudes and no scruples against hitting somebody over the back of the head with a lead filled aluminum baseball bat they could swear to have smelled Gods cologne. They are born of a Skinhead gang that identified with the heyday and original movement of 69', original or Trojan Skins and not boneheads (the slang term used by their ilk for Fascist or White Power Skinheads). What is not to say White Power Skinheads have not made it into the Bloodline yet.

Nickname: Skinheads

Covenant: The bloodline is really too small and young to include members in many different Covenant. Those who get involved with Kindred politics and covenants usually will pursue martial positions like leg-breakers, enforcers, inquisitors, possibly Sworn of the Axe and the like. However, based on their past crimes and deeply rooted loyalty to their own bloodline, many Covenants tend to mistrust them too much to put them in position of any real power.

Bloodline Disciplines: Animalism, Protean, Resilience, Vigor

Weakness: Streiter share the weakness of Clan Gangrel and are equally prone to succumb to their feral urges. In addition, their "working class" pride often gets the best of them – Streiter must succeed in a Resolve roll (or spend 1 Willpower) to back down from any challenge. Furthermore, should a Streiter ever be bested in a challenge, they automatically lose one point of Willpower.

Character Generation: Streiter is a Bloodline that originates from Vienna. However, they are still small and very selective in their choice of children.

It all boils down to one thing: Sorcery, also known as Satanism.

Spring Sanctification

This rite is only performed by Maiden Acolytes, and while it was designed to be invoked on the night of the Spring Equinox, it also works on a lunar cycle of once each full moon.  This rite works only on a flawless white heifer.

When the rite is successful, any Kindred who drinks the cow’s blood may take nourishment from it, so long as the drinking does not kill the cow.  Regardless of the drinker’s Blood Potency, the Vitae is not only useful, but almost human in its flavor.  The cow only retains this quality until dawn.
No individual can cast Spring Sanctification more than once per night.

Note: Ritual modified from the original.



Fire is problematic for the Circle.  On one hand, fire is part of most major religions and often a key component of Pagan ritual.  On the other hand, it represents death and destruction, invoking the fear in the Beast that rests within all Kindred.  Acolytes who have mastered this ritual have achieved a compromise which allows them to satisfy the demands of ritual and symbolism while placating their Beast.  It is also used for more practical purposes such as illuminating dark areas, and is a favorite of Skalds in Warsaw who use it to augment their fantastic tales.
Paganism + Roleplaying scripts + Sex?

Madonna talking about her SuperBowl half-time performance, which she calls the "Greatest Show on Earth" (ie, a circus)... and which she compares to giving a "sermon" in "church".
Jewish Encyclopedia, c2006 edition.
International Institute for Secular Humanistic Judaism, c2012.

"Omri and Ahab [Israelis] were greater kings than David and Solomon [TRUE]... But Israel was destroyed by the Assyrians.  Only the Jews survived. [FALSE, LIES]."

So, if "Israel was destroyed [and o]nly the Jews survived:"  WHY THEN, is the nation of "Israel" not called "JUDAH" [what it really is].  By the way, Israel was not destroyed any more than was Judah, with the diasporas.  They simply went their separate ways -- as usual.
Biography of Chaim Potok, born in the Bronx of Polish immigrants.
"All About Jewish Theatre"
Jewish Library.
Merovingians connected to Mormons.
Good book; I'm about halfway through it, now (just reading a few minutes per day).
LSD, a synthetic drug invented by the US Military in the Veteran's Affairs Hospital... used extensively for mind control, psychological breaking, and programming.
Limited edition copy, signed by Manly P. Hall

Drawing from Manly P. Hall's Private Collection of Alchemical Manuscripts (Box 1)

Knights Hospitaller Templars' usual false propaganda; but at least they admit to their Neanderthal origins.
The Spectrum, c1999.
Committee of 300.
Borel (Genesis 6:1)
Tovot ["troubles"], (Genesis 6:2)
Hmdah (Genesis 6:1)
Freemasonry = Theosophy... It can't get any clearer than that.  We must remove all Freemasons and other religious fanatics from public office.
Grandiose delusions of power, magical thinking, psychosis.  Precisely what you should expect from Nephilim Hybrids.  Bestiality was the Original Sin in Genesis (the Beginning).  They are the reason the whole world has gone to shit.
c1978, they call it a religion, they call it a church.
Stanford University, 1964, "Ritual to Odin Timesharing System"
Nice bookplate, artwork, on this one.
Fancy bookplate.
Did you know that George Washington, U.S. President, was descended from Odin (an imaginary god)?
A sincere attempt at revealing the Truth.
Lunar and Solar Aryan Tribes; Rajput Clans
Numerous issues of the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland
A mockery of Christianity and of Humanity.
More New Age mind cult tripe.
I just keep turning up all sorts of evil dirt.
Politics and Religion, like Church and State...
"Should an honorable man commit evil?" ... What kind of stupid question is that?  It's the sort of thing one might hear from the mouths of Hybrids.
"Our purpose was to document the event."
The Library of Congress had the nerve to remove Col. L. Fletcher Prouty's book from their archives.  One can only imagine how many other books have been lost to censorship.  The Smithsonian is also suspected of destroying evidence of ancient North American Giants.
The connections between the Rothschilds, Abraham Lincoln, and John Wilkes Booth.
"The Numerus clausus in Hungary: Studies on the First Anti-Jewish Law and Academic Anti-Semitism in Modern Central Europe. Budapest: Pasts Inc. Centre for Historical Research; 2012. p. 206-18. (Research Reports on Central European History)"

He's a pretty shady character.

(Not really, I'm still working on it, lol.  Sorry to allow this to ramble on so long -- it would have been more suitable for a completely separate blog, dedicated to this one subject alone.)
Latest update, May 15, 2013


  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. Thanks a lot for sharing this with all folks you really recognise what you are talking about! In this complex environment business need to present there company data in meaningful way.Sqiar ( which is in UK,provide services like Tableau and Data Warehousing etc .In these services sqiar experts convert company data into meaningful way.

  3. Y'all feel free to disregard the spammer-bots ^ ^ ^ ; I sometimes keep their comments around for awhile, just for reference.

  4. Are you so poor and you want to become rich? do you want to become just like other people who are very rich and powerful or are you a musician who want to be famous if yes then here is your privilege to join the illuminati in other for you to become the world best fame, power and wealth will all be yours forever if only you are ready to join the great illuminati earn $500,000.00 monthly for becoming a member and $1,000.000.00 as your instant reward ... so if you are so interested in joining the illuminati i want you to emails us, now or you call one of our agent for more, inquires +2348137838605...... don''t miss this great opportunity.

  5. It's all about money and material things for the Freemasons. They think money buys them status. But a monkey wearing a designer suit is still a monkey.

  6. Turkish/Muslim pimps owned thousands of slaves in mid-century Europe. They survived by pimping their girls to wealthy landowners. Many of the offspring resembled those who fathered them. Girls were transformed into Judaism as protection from joining the church. Outsiders named them Ashkenazim because they spoke Yiddish.

  7. Shrewdness is currently an unidentified biological entity that enters living organisms. Its presence can be seen even among pets. One dog is always more cunning than their siblings. For unexplained reasons the Ashkenazim appears to be the shrewdest among sub races and is endowed with this mysterious biological entity. Superior intelligence alone cannot account for numerous Ashkenazim being on top of the wolf pack-----hi IQ geeks seldom hold jobs as CEOs of corporations. Until the essence of shrewdness is discovered we can but stand in awe at the amazing and shrewd Ashkenazim who are sometimes called Jews.

  8. " I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."

    "Thy terribleness hath deceived thee, and the pride of thine heart, O thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, that holdest the height of the hill: though thou shouldest make thy nest as high as the eagle, I will bring thee down from thence, saith the LORD. "


  10. Some good dots here intermixed with some errors.

    Christianity is a death cult invented by the Jews to mind-enslave the "goyim." That is the FIRST thing that you need to learn. :)

    Yes, Freemasonry is a crypto Jewish organization. :)

    You have much to learn, grasshopper. :)