Search This Blog

Monday, January 9, 2012

James Lick's mtDNA Analyzer Data for my Mitochondria

My personal data from James Lick's mtDNA anaylyzer... Please understand that I'm making this public, due to certain people who think that they have the authority over me and my family, to deny us our ~identity, ~ethnicity and ~heritage; I'm Cherokee directly, ~matrilineally, back to at LEAST my gg-grandmother, who was born in about 1840, so my ~mtDNA~ is Cherokee.

Certain people, especially some government-connected bureaucrats (my ex-employers at the VA, station number 666, in Sheridan, Wyoming; and Janet Napolitano [Mei Mei, NB, and other undercover aliases which she uses on her personal hangout there, the "Teahouse in a Tree House" thread on the 'Christianity' forum, where she hangs/hung out at the time, with her Nazi (no joke) friends] and others of the Dept. of 'Homeland' Sickurity, her friends, and associates, on the Amazon Religion forum), etc.; have rudely and mockingly stated to me directly, to wit, that I'm 'stupid', 'mistaken', or 'lying' about it (they claim, for no valid reason and without evidence, just because they don't like the ~truth or ~Christians or ~Americans, apparently).

But I am sure that the facts will prove that neither ~I nor my ~family should ever have been treated in such a disrespectful fashion by the presumptuous, greedy, and bigoted 'authorities'.  I take that sort of organized and intentional, openly hateful ~harassment by the power elite in ~government, and their deliberate ~lies (against my person, family and religious beliefs - I'm openly and unapologetically Christian, though I do not 'belong' to any cult or denomination), as a racist affront; and multiple violations of my Civil Rights. She and others like her in government, are guilty by such underhanded and devious actions and deeds, of undoing and undermining this great country and its good people.

Had my gg-grandmother, who had a Cherokee ~surname, and a husband also with a Cherokee surname, not been fullblooded Indian, I would have been informed of that fact by my dying grandmother.  She was sick but of sound mind; ambulatory; and of outstanding morals then, and throughout her entire long life (as was her husband my grandfather, an honest, upright Sheriff's deputy, son of a respected Physician, and the Levy County jailer in Bronson, Florida, back in the early 1960's); so I've no reason to doubt her word on the matter of her own grandmother -- quote: "She was Cherokee".

I also have other quite credible family members who can testify on our behalf and vouch for my honesty and sanity (which never should have been on trial anyway, without just cause - this is ridiculous what I've had to go through, to prove that ~I~  (a law-abiding citizen of the US) am not lying, crazy, or stupid. I say, they'd better ~prove that I'm wrong, or stop libelling / slandering me and my ~family.

Something is very wrong, when people who don't even know me or the family, fly into over-reactive, bizarre ~denial, about us being ~Cherokee, for pete's sake.  And they do so (really continuously, among the so-called elitist US aristocracy whom I've encountered lately), without a shred of evidence to back up their claims.

I don't exagerate my claim, embellish or anything; merely state the simple fact of the matter (and I don't ~need to prove a damn thing about it, either, but will do so if pressed; they'll probably end up wishing they'd left well enough alone, by the time the dust has settled over it), but some people have really gotten terribly bent out of shape over what is really none of their BUSINESS.  If they hate the truth that much, they'd best come up with better means with which to discredit or to disprove me about it.

Very highly placed government officials (as mentioned here) and some random, anonymously self-proclaimed DNA 'consultants' and company representatives (online), have been extremely rude and evil about the simple fact that my gg-grandmother was a ~Cherokee ~woman. Why? Something isn't right with them. They must have some kind of agenda, and it probably involves money, racism, sexism, or privilege (neither of which I have, btw).  Because I've not stepped out of line, by innocently stating the simple truth, when it was appropriate to do so.  But they have stepped way too far out of line.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

mthap version 0.16 (2011-07-11); haplogroup data version Phylotree Build 13 (2011-12-28)
raw data source fastafile.txt (591B)
FASTA format was uploaded. Based on the markers found, assuming the following regions were completely sequenced: HVR1.
Found 546 markers at 546 positions covering 3.3% of mtDNA.

Markers found (shown as differences to rCRS):

HVR2:
CR:
HVR1: 16189C 16223T 16278T 16292T 16295T (16519C)

Best mtDNA Haplogroup Matches:
1) X
Defining Markers for haplogroup X:
HVR2: 73G 263G
CR: 750G 1438G 2706G 4769G 6221C 6371T 7028T 8860G 11719A 12705T 13966G 14470C 14766T 15326G
HVR1: 16189C 16223T 16278T

Marker path from rCRS to haplogroup X (plus extra markers):
H2a2a(rCRS) 263G 8860G 15326G ⇨ H2a2 750G ⇨ H2a 4769G ⇨ H2 1438G ⇨ H 2706G 7028T ⇨ HV 14766T ⇨ R0 73G 11719A ⇨ R 12705T 16223T ⇨ N 6221C 6371T 13966G 14470C 16189C 16278T ⇨ X 16292T 16295T (16519C)

Imperfect Match. Your results contained differences with this haplogroup:
Matches(3): 16189C 16223T 16278T
Extras(2): 16292T 16295T (16519C)
No-Calls(16): 73G 263G 750G 1438G 2706G 4769G 6221C 6371T 7028T 8860G 11719A 12705T 13966G 14470C 14766T 15326G


2) X1'2'3
Defining Markers for haplogroup X1'2'3:
HVR2: 73G 153G 263G
CR: 750G 1438G 2706G 4769G 6221C 6371T 7028T 8860G 11719A 12705T 13966G 14470C 14766T 15326G
HVR1: 16189C 16223T 16278T

Marker path from rCRS to haplogroup X1'2'3 (plus extra markers):
H2a2a(rCRS) 263G 8860G 15326G ⇨ H2a2 750G ⇨ H2a 4769G ⇨ H2 1438G ⇨ H 2706G 7028T ⇨ HV 14766T ⇨ R0 73G 11719A ⇨ R 12705T 16223T ⇨ N 6221C 6371T 13966G 14470C 16189C 16278T ⇨ X 153G ⇨ X1'2'3 16292T 16295T (16519C)

Imperfect Match. Your results contained differences with this haplogroup:
Matches(3): 16189C 16223T 16278T
Extras(2): 16292T 16295T (16519C)
No-Calls(17): 73G 153G 263G 750G 1438G 2706G 4769G 6221C 6371T 7028T 8860G 11719A 12705T 13966G 14470C 14766T 15326G


3) X1'3
Defining Markers for haplogroup X1'3:
HVR2: 73G 146C 153G 263G
CR: 750G 1438G 2706G 4769G 6221C 6371T 7028T 8860G 11719A 12705T 13966G 14470C 14766T 15326G
HVR1: 16189C 16223T 16278T

Marker path from rCRS to haplogroup X1'3 (plus extra markers):
H2a2a(rCRS) 263G 8860G 15326G ⇨ H2a2 750G ⇨ H2a 4769G ⇨ H2 1438G ⇨ H 2706G 7028T ⇨ HV 14766T ⇨ R0 73G 11719A ⇨ R 12705T 16223T ⇨ N 6221C 6371T 13966G 14470C 16189C 16278T ⇨ X 153G ⇨ X1'2'3 146C ⇨ X1'3 16292T 16295T (16519C)

Imperfect Match. Your results contained differences with this haplogroup:
Matches(3): 16189C 16223T 16278T
Extras(2): 16292T 16295T (16519C)
No-Calls(18): 73G 146C 153G 263G 750G 1438G 2706G 4769G 6221C 6371T 7028T 8860G 11719A 12705T 13966G 14470C 14766T 15326G


http://pattyinglishms.hubpages.com/hub/Native-American-Nations-Part-XXII

http://s4.zetaboards.com/Afro_Asian_mt_DNA/topic/9062867/1/

No comments:

Post a Comment